articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230221-sf-credit-brief-clo-insights-2023-u-s-bsl-index-assessing-the-benefits-of-active-management-in-2022-12644990 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: CLO Insights 2023 U.S. BSL Index: Assessing The Benefits Of Active Management In 2022

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Overall Delinquency Rate Increased By 32 Bps To 4.7% In April 2024; Office Loans Had The Highest Increase

COMMENTS

Japan Private-Sector RMBS Performance Watch: Rate Hike Has Limited Impact

COMMENTS

European CMBS Monitor Q1 2024


SF Credit Brief: CLO Insights 2023 U.S. BSL Index: Assessing The Benefits Of Active Management In 2022

image

Downgrades across obligors in U.S. broadly syndicated loan (BSL) collateralized loan obligation (CLO) collateral pools again outnumbered upgrades in January 2023, see "U.S. BSL CLO Obligors: Corporate Rating Actions Tracker 2023 (As Of Feb. 10)," published Feb. 14, 2023), although the amount of actions have declined over the past few months. Most of the credit metrics across the CLO Insights 2023 U.S. BSL Index remained stable during the first month of the year, with CLO 'CCC' buckets inching up to 5.48% and average junior overcollateralization (O/C) cushions declining slightly to 4.39%. Despite BSL CLOs having gained some par during 2022, some transactions are still seeing haircuts in their O/C tests due to exposure to defaulted assets and excess 'CCC' assets (typically greater than 7.5%), with most of these being seen in CLOs originated in 2019 and earlier. Exposure to assets from 'B-' rated companies now sits at just under 31%, a record. A potential mitigating factor is that less than 4% of BSL CLO collateral comes from obligors rated 'B-' have a negative outlook.

Table 1

CLO BSL Index Metrics (CLO Insights 2022 U.S. BSL Index)(i)
BSL 'B-' (%) 'CCC' category (%) Nonperforming assets (%) SPWARF WARR (%) Watch negative (%) Negative outlook (%) Weighted avg. price of portfolio ($) Jr. O/C cushion (%) % of target par B-' on negative outlook (%)
Jan. 2022 26.41 4.94 0.17 2700 60.44 0.88 12.33 98.79 4.37 99.68 2.00
Feb. 2022 27.16 4.27 0.37 2708 60.43 0.28 11.94 98.83 4.41 99.68 1.92
March 2022 27.09 4.26 0.39 2708 60.41 0.11 11.35 98.02 4.40 99.68 1.66
April 2022 27.44 4.17 0.13 2690 60.45 1.06 10.86 97.88 4.31 99.69 1.59
May 2022 27.76 4.26 0.14 2700 60.45 1.20 9.83 97.57 4.30 99.70 1.41
June 2022 27.70 4.14 0.20 2706 60.48 1.27 10.46 94.60 4.39 99.71 1.43
July 2022 28.59 4.01 0.35 2720 60.27 1.35 11.08 92.19 4.45 99.74 1.80
Aug. 2022 28.70 4.00 0.34 2726 60.32 1.46 11.53 93.81 4.47 99.78 1.94
Sept. 2022 29.00 4.21 0.59 2754 60.24 1.03 12.20 94.85 4.50 99.81 2.08
Oct. 2022 28.85 4.40 0.50 2751 60.16 1.16 13.36 92.12 4.50 99.82 2.86
Nov. 2022 28.85 5.02 0.40 2754 60.13 0.59 14.46 92.40 4.47 99.84 3.31
Dec. 2022 29.50 4.95 0.34 2749 59.81 0.32 14.62 93.08 4.44 99.85 3.48
Jan. 2023 30.03 5.23 0.50 2764 60.20 0.14 15.18 92.88 4.45 99.85 3.84
Feb. 2023(i) 30.09 5.48 0.46 2766 60.26 0.22 15.76 94.40 4.39 99.86 3.94
(i)A small handful of transactions have dropped off this index for the calculation of the Feb. 1, 2023, metrics, as they have exited the reinvestment period in January 2023. BSL CLO--Broadly syndicated loan collateralized loan obligation. SPWARF--S&P Global Ratings' weighted average rating factor. WARR--Weighted average recovery rate. O/C--Overcollateralization.

The Benefits Of Active Management In 2022

In comparing what could've happened in 2022 versus how the average CLO transaction actually fared, we find the trades done by managers did significantly alter the course of the average transaction.

In last month's update, we summarized our rating actions across U.S. BSL CLO obligors in 2022 (see "CLO Insights U.S. BSL Index 2022 Wrap Up: Credit Metrics Deteriorated Slightly, But Par Gains And Healthy O/C Test Cushions Should Help In 2023," published Jan. 12, 2023. During the full year, companies in U.S. BSL CLO collateral pools saw over 270 downgrades, including 78 obligors lowered to 'B-', 72 obligors lowered into the 'CCC' category, and 29 obligors lowered to a non-performing (below 'CCC-') rating. As noted in table 1 above, several of the credit metrics only deteriorated slightly between the start and end of 2022, despite having moved around considerably during the year. For example, BSL CLO exposure to 'CCC' assets (including obligors rated 'B-' on CreditWatch negative) started 2022 at 4.94%, then dropped to a low of 4.01% on July 1st, before reversing course and ending up at 5.23% at the end of 2022.

Meanwhile, we note average portfolio turnover in full-year 2022 across the reinvesting BSL CLOs in the index was about 30% in 2022, compared to over 49% in 2021. The higher level of portfolio turnover in 2021 is mostly due to higher refinancing and new issuance volumes in the loan market in 2021 compared to 2022. However, in comparing what could've happened had the CLO managers done nothing in 2022, we find the trades done in 2022 did significantly alter the course of the average transaction (see tables below).

Comparing what happened to what could have happened

image

Borrowing from the framework we utilized in our 2016 and 2020 studies on manager value, we assessed the value of active portfolio management by comparing two sets of metrics:

  • The actual change in BSL CLO credit metrics during 2022, including portfolio turnover (left);
  • Metrics from the same BSL CLO collateral pools, but assuming they were static CLOs with no trading or asset turnover during 2022 (middle); and,
  • The difference between the two sets of metrics (right).

Looking at our hypothetical static portfolios metrics in the middle table, we see that CLO 'CCC' buckets could have increased to 7.33% versus the actual year-end value of 5.23%, while non-performing exposures could've increased to 0.81% versus the actual 0.50%. Also, junior O/C test cushions would have been 0.30% lower (4.15% versus the actual 4.45%). In fact, the only metric that would have been better without active management was BSL CLO exposure to obligors rated 'B-'. Managers during the year saw their 'B-' exposures increase as they traded out of 'CCC' rated issuers (or issuers that wound up with a 'CCC' category rating at the end of 2022), and often times, traded into 'B-' exposures (or issuers that wound up with a 'B-' rating at the of 2022).

When reviewing the impact of trades made by CLO managers in 2022, we find across the 30% turnover: the 'CCC' bucket exposure was reduced by 2.1%, non-performing exposure was reduced by 0.31%, and 'B-' exposure increased by 1.9%. 2022 also saw periods of loan price volatility, especially around the middle of the year, which gave CLO managers an opportunity to de-risk their portfolios and build par, a rare combination and a time for several managers to prove their ability to add value. Some managers built par by purchasing bonds that were trading at a discount in 2022.

Differences in performance amongst the Index

The vintage effect on performance was noticeable during the year, as we see clear differences across the credit metrics CLOs originated pre-pandemic and post-pandemic.

Table 2

Pre-Pandemic U.S. BSL CLOs
Start of 2022 End of 2022 Change in 2022
Full-year turnover (%) 30.93 30.93
SPWARF 2715 2778 63
'B-' (%) 25.60 29.33 3.73
'CCC' category (%) 6.08 5.92 (0.15)
Nonperforming category (%) 0.25 0.60 0.35
Par (% of target par) 99.25 99.38 0.13
Junior O/C cushion (%) 3.66 3.67 0.01
BSL--Broadly syndicated loan. CLO--Collateralized loan obligation. SPWARF--S&P Global Ratings' weighted average rating factor. O/C--Overcollateralization.

Table 3

Post-Pandemic U.S. BSL CLOs
Start of 2022 End of 2022 Change in 2022
Full-year turnover (%) 30.06 30.06
SPWARF 2678 2745 67
'B-' (%) 27.33 30.92 3.59
'CCC' category (%) 3.48 4.36 0.87
Nonperforming category (%) 0.06 0.36 0.30
Par (% of target par) 100.18 100.45 0.28
Junior O/C cushion (%) 5.23 5.43 0.20
BSL--Broadly syndicated loan. CLO--Collateralized loan obligation. SPWARF--S&P Global Ratings' weighted average rating factor. O/C--Overcollateralization.

Relative to post-pandemic CLOs, pre-pandemic CLOs:

  • Started 2022 with a higher' CCC' bucket (6.08% vs. 3.48%);
  • Experienced slightly more turnover (30.93% vs. 30.06%);
  • Saw a reduction in 'CCCs' during the year (-0.15% vs. +0.87%); and
  • Saw a smaller increase in par (+0.13% vs. 0.28%).

The pre-pandemic transactions had weaker credit metrics at the start of 2022; relative to post-pandemic CLOs, they were closer to exceeding the 7.5% 'CCC' thresholds, and they also had less average junior O/C test cushion. During the year, managers made slightly more trades across these pre-pandemic CLOs, resulting in slightly higher average portfolio turnover. CLO managers were effective in managing the size of the 'CCC' buckets despite the fact that about 70 CLO obligors were experiencing downgrades into the 'CCC' category during the year. However, the de-risking efforts limited CLO managers' ability to build par and build O/C cushion; the par gain across pre-pandemic CLOs (+0.13%) was lower than the par gain across post-pandemic CLOs (+0.28%), and it was also reflected in the average increase in junior O/C cushions (+0.01% compared with +0.20%).

On the flip side, post-pandemic transactions had cleaner portfolios, and thus had more cushion within their 'CCC' thresholds and junior O/C cushions at the start of the year. They saw a larger increase in 'CCC' exposure (+87 basis points (bps) as opposed to a reduction of 15 bps for pre-pandemic CLOs). Meanwhile, across the trades made in 2022, post-pandemic CLOs were able to build more par (+28 bps) and O/C cushion.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Daniel Hu, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 2206;
daniel.hu@spglobal.com
Stephen A Anderberg, New York + (212) 438-8991;
stephen.anderberg@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Deegant R Pandya, New York + 1 (212) 438 1289;
deegant.pandya@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in