articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230906-u-s-municipal-water-and-sewer-utilities-credit-brief-florida-12828996 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Municipal Water And Sewer Utilities Credit Brief: Florida

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

History Of U.S. State Ratings

COMMENTS

U.S. State Ratings And Outlooks: Current List

COMMENTS

U.S. State Medicaid Transition: Stable Condition Near Term, With Outyears Demanding Care


U.S. Municipal Water And Sewer Utilities Credit Brief: Florida

Overview

Florida municipal utilities have experienced stable and generally strengthening credit quality in recent years, supported by continued economic growth and diversification, and substantiated financial metrics. We expect credit quality to remain stable in the state, given our expectation for continued economic growth, existing federal stimulus, and utilities' general propensity for emergency preparedness and financial flexibility, which lead to greater resiliency. However, although our expectation for a national recession over the next 12 months has abated, we expect supply chain disruptions, a protracted inflationary environment, and labor pressures to continue to have an impact on utilities, in addition to ongoing hurricane risk. Moreover, rising insurance premiums for homeowners in Florida could deaccelerate economic growth in some service areas and reduce disposable income for ratepayers over the longer term, if not offset by rising incomes.

S&P Global Ratings maintains 79 ratings on municipal utilities in Florida. Notably, upgrades in Florida significantly outpaced the nation from 2021 to July 2023, with no downgrades during this time frame. We view the state's overall positive rating movement as supported by the state's continued economic and population gains, which drove growth-supported revenues, bolstered financial metrics, and benefited economies of scale. However, while growth has yielded benefits for utilities in the state, it also poses challenges. We view the economic and financial benefits of growth as tempered by management teams' ability to manage growth-driven capital pressures, which can often present credit limitations.

Roughly half of the credits that have experienced positive rating actions since 2021 face the need to manage growth-related pressures, primarily with respect to capital. For instance, the City of Palm Coast's upgraded rating primarily reflects economic growth and diversification, which substantially increased nominal incomes and positively affected the city's market position assessment, whereas the City of Port St. Lucie's upgrade reflects management's ability to maintain very strong financial metrics and affordable rates despite growth-related demand pressures. Both cities, however, will need to manage large capital programs relative to their size. Palm Coast's five-year capital program cost increased by approximately 75% from 2016 to 2021, from about $70 million to $120 million, driven primarily by growth and demand, while Port St. Lucie's anticipated capital costs more than doubled from 2017 to 2022, driven by capital repairs and improvements.

What We Are Watching

image

Florida has a strong institutional framework in place to augment the private insurance sector, including via the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. Nevertheless, in the past two years some property and casualty insurers have discontinued policy coverage in Florida, in part as a result of rising insured losses due to natural catastrophes (source: Insurance Services Office; S&P Global Ratings). For example, Farmers Insurance recently announced that it will no longer offer coverage in Florida, while AAA and American International Group, Inc. (AIG) will not renew some higher exposed home and auto insurance policies.

Although recent state legislation could help stabilize the private insurance market, we believe that rising premiums and difficulty obtaining insurance could have a negative impact on economic growth over the long term if rising costs for home ownership reduce disposable incomes for existing Florida ratepayers, adding to affordability pressures over the longer term. We believe that long-term planning and supportive rate structures, such as those that promote cost recovery and revenue stability, will continue to be fundamental for utilities facing affordability pressures and large capital programs.

Spotlight On Environmental, Social, Governance Factors

image

Florida utilities contend with various acute and chronic physical climate risks, including severe weather such as hurricanes, sea-level rise, and flooding are common considerations within the state's portfolio. We assess each credit's financial flexibility and planning initiatives in place to prepare for, respond to, and recover from the risks to which they are exposed. Following Hurricane Ian (category 4), utilities are generally well-prepared to respond to severe weather events, with no downgrades for any utility we rate, following the catastrophe. We note that Florida utilities are generally well-prepared with comprehensive disaster plans, as well as with management teams that are typically well-versed in working with emergency management agencies, such the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Salt-water intrusion due to sea-level rise is also a growing concern, given saltwater can move inland along coastal rivers or penetrate underground aquifers, driving up water treatment charges. Notably, helping to offset this risk is the rising number of water reclamation projects in the state, which can reduce overpumping and replenish aquifers to offset salt-water intrusion. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, Florida is a national leader in the reuse of reclaimed water, making up 35% of all water supply projects (American Society of Civil Engineers; 2021).

Despite the implementation of the EPA's federal cyber security plan for water utilities pausing on July 1, 2022, Florida state agencies and local governments became subject to amendments made to Florida's State Cybersecurity Act. The act imposes certain ransomware reporting obligations and prohibits entities from paying or complying with cyber randoms. It also requires cyber security training for all new governmental hires, among other operational requirements. Although the state's bill impact analysis indicates these initiatives will likely have a negative fiscal impact on utilities, it also outlines grant opportunities through the state for technical assistance, along with dedicated funding sources allocated toward developing cyber security training government employees are required to take. We view this expansion of the cyber security act as having favorable credit attributes for the portfolio, as it has a structured and supportive framework for utilities to mitigate cyber risk.

Florida Municipal Utilities Data

Chart 1

image

Table 1

Florida water and sewer utilities--ratings list
Entity Rating Outlook
Leesburg AA- Stable
Fort Pierce Util Auth A Stable
Clearwater AA+ Stable
Florida Keys Aque Auth AA- Stable
Pinellas Cnty AA+ Stable
Tampa Bay Wtr AA+ Stable
Brevard Cnty AA Stable
Broward Cnty AA+ Stable
Cape Coral A+ Negative
Clearwater AA+ Stable
Lehigh Utility System A+ Stable
Hillsborough Cnty AA+ Stable
JEA AA+ Stable
Miami Dade County AA- Stable
Oviedo AA Stable
Palm Bay AA- Stable
Palm Beach County AAA Stable
Pasco County AA+ Stable
Seacoast Util Auth AA+ Stable
Tallahassee AA Stable
Auburndale A+ Stable
Cocoa AA+ Stable
Crestview A+ Stable
Davie AA Stable
Fort Lauderdale AA+ Stable
Oakland Pk AA Stable
Seminole Cnty AA+ Stable
St Augustine AA- Stable
St Johns Cnty AAA Stable
Tampa AAA Stable
Winter Springs AA- Stable
Charlotte Cnty AA- Stable
Deltona A+ Stable
Emerald Coast Util Auth A Stable
Fort Myers A+ Stable
Martin Cnty AA Stable
Palm Coast AA- Stable
Polk County AA+ Stable
Sarasota County AA+ Stable
Tohopekaliga Wtr Auth AAA Stable
West Palm Beach AA+ Stable
Winter Haven AA- Stable
North Miami Beach A+ Stable
Miami Beach AA- Positive
Lee County AA+ Stable
Palm Beach Cnty Solid Waste Auth AA+ Stable
Hillsborough Cnty AA+ Stable
Miami Dade County AA Stable
North Sumter County Utility Dependent District AA- Stable
Bay Laurel Center Community Development District A+ Stable
Polk City A Stable
Miami Beach AA- Stable
Dunedin AA- Stable
Dunedin AA Stable
North Sumter County Utility Dependent District A Stable
Orlando AAA Stable
Venice AA Stable
Tarpon Springs AA- Stable
Fernandina Beach AA- Stable
St Lucie Cnty A+ Stable
Riviera Beach Util Spl Dist A+ Stable
Holley-Navarre Wtr Sys Inc A+ Stable
Village Ctr Comnty Dev Dist AA- Stable
Village Ctr Comnty Dev Dist AA Stable
East Cent Regl Wastewtr Facs Operating Brd AA+ Stable
Port St Lucie AA Stable
Riviera Beach A+ Stable
Orange Cnty AAA Stable
Ocoee AA+ Stable
Lynn Haven AA- Negative
Miramar AAA Stable
Central Sumter Utility Company LLC A Stable
Miami Dade County AA+ Stable
Wildwood Utility Dependent District A- Stable
Immokalee Wtr & Swr Dist A+ Stable
Polk Regional Water Cooperative BBB+ Stable
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship District A Stable
Fort Lauderdale AAA Stable
Brevard Cnty AA+ Stable

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Chelsy Shipman, San Francisco 2148711417;
chelsy.shipman@spglobal.com
Jenny Poree, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5044;
jenny.poree@spglobal.com
Nora G Wittstruck, New York + (212) 438-8589;
nora.wittstruck@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in