articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240129-five-u-s-public-pension-and-opeb-points-to-watch-in-2024-12972167 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Five U.S. Public Pension And OPEB Points To Watch In 2024

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, April 2024: Private Credit Is A Growing Segment Of Nonbank Finance

COMMENTS

U.S. Public Finance Housing Rating Actions, First-Quarter 2024

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Could Megatrends Influence Credit Materiality?

COMMENTS

Charter School Brief: North Carolina


Five U.S. Public Pension And OPEB Points To Watch In 2024

Funded Ratios Will Likely Rise Slightly In Fiscal 2024

S&P Global Ratings expects asset performance to spur a slight improvement in U.S. public pension funded ratios for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 (fiscal 2024) thanks to positive returns in the first half of the year. U.S. pension plans, on average, assume annual asset returns of 7% and returns above or below this assumption equate to a "gain" or "loss" compared with planned inflows that might affect contributions and credit stress. We estimate that a typical public pension plan will have experienced a gain due to a return of about 6.5% for the first half of fiscal 2024 (13% annualized), which is 3.0% above the half-year assumption of 3.5% (annualized to 7.0%).

We started with a 73% funded ratio calculated as of fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, in our state and largest city surveys (see "U.S. State Pension And OPEBs: Funding Progress Is Likely To Pick Up In 2023 After Slipping In 2022," Sept. 7, 2023, and "Pension Funded Ratios Fall For Most U.S. Big Cities On Weakened Investment Returns," Oct. 19, 2023, both on RatingsDirect). We note that the pension funded ratios in any given fiscal year are typically represented in issuer audits the following year, so we expect our 2024 surveys will reflect the slight improvement estimated in chart 1 as of fiscal year ended 2023. We projected to fiscal year-end 2024 using three funded ratio scenarios. The first scenario shows continued growth for the second half of the fiscal year at the same pace as the first half. The second projects earnings at the expected rate for the rest of the fiscal year. And the third scenario projects assets at 0.5% for the second half to achieve an annual return of 7.0% and maintain funded ratios.

Chart 1

image

Asset Allocations Increase Risk Through Less Transparent Investments

Even as assumed real return (total market return less inflation) modestly fell over the past five years, we see a possible increase of market risk within already risky target portfolios given increasing private equity and other opaque alternative investments. In chart 2, overlaid by the line showing assumed real return, we have four portfolio risk categories (see sidebar) making up the average U.S. pension trust over the past 20 years, from bottom to top. We see risk increasing not only from various "other" investments, but also within the equity and risk mitigator categories. In the chart, outlined in black, we see an increase in certain risky asset classes to 51% in 2022 from 26% in 2002 and 39% as recently as 2017.

Chart 2

image

The real return assumption grew from 2002 to 2017 (see chart 2), but decreased slightly in the past five years likely reflecting the 2022 inflation spike. We expect that inflation will decrease this year, which could lead to lower yields and higher market risk within U.S. pension asset portfolios if fixed income allocations are decreased to meet return assumptions. This could lead to contribution volatility and budgetary stress during rapid market movements.

Recent Inflation Volatility Affects Pensions In Multiple Ways

After spiking to over 9% in June 2022, the U.S CPI fell to as low as 3.0% in June 2023. Although CPI has since risen to 3.4% in December 2023, it is on par with the 40-year average of 2.8% that ended 2020 following the previous rate spike in the late 1970s.

Chart 3 contrasts CPI, the long-term U.S. Treasury rate, and the surveyed average U.S. public pension inflation assumption from the Public Plans Database. Since surveyed inflation more closely reflects the long-term U.S. Treasury rate, we are monitoring forward-looking expectations to see if long-term rates come down or if CPI is expected to continue its volatility. S&P Global Ratings will continue to monitor contribution sufficiency and funding discipline to assess the risk of funding deterioration that could lead to budget gaps over time. Furthermore, inflation underlies many aspects of pension and retiree medical (other postemployment benefit [OPEB]) costs, in addition to budgetary concerns for plan sponsors.

Chart 3

image

image

POB Issuance May Come Back With Low Rates

POB and OPEB obligation bond issuance halted in the U.S. in 2023 primarily due to high interest rates compared to recent history. While CPI has come down, issuers could still consider interest rates high, discouraging them from issuing obligation bonds. Furthermore, given that POBs typically require time and cost, issuers might wait for the current volatile market to settle convincingly before beginning the issuance process. For additional information, including market timing risk associated with obligation bonds, see "U.S. Public Pension Fiscal 2023 Update: Funded Ratios Stable, Inflation Retreats, And POB Issuance Stops," July 11, 2023.

Chart 4

image

Aging Demographics Magnify Market Risk

Baby boomers continue to reach retirement age, and budgetary concerns have often slowed hiring and reduced their replacement. As a result, pension plans have experienced a shift to fewer active employees who make contributions compared with pensioners who draw benefits from them. Aging demographics can not only increase budgetary stress for states and local governments, but also compound market risk exposure for employers because of the loss of plan contributors to help offset the budgetary impact of negative market movements (see chart 5). Issuers with plans that take on high levels of market risk within their asset portfolios could see magnified contribution volatility risk as a result of an aging population.

Chart 5

image

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Todd D Kanaster, ASA, FCA, MAAA, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4490;
Todd.Kanaster@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Geoffrey E Buswick, Boston + 1 (617) 530 8311;
geoffrey.buswick@spglobal.com
Christian Richards, Washington D.C. + 1 (617) 530 8325;
christian.richards@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in