articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240201-u-s-domestic-aaam-money-market-fund-trends-fourth-quarter-2023-12986706.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Domestic 'AAAm' Money Market Fund Trends (Fourth-Quarter 2023)

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Banking: Higher Minimum Reserve Requirements Will Dent Swiss Banks’ Profits

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, April 2024: Private Credit Is A Growing Segment Of Nonbank Finance

COMMENTS

Capital Markets Revenue Could Improve In 2024 On Rebounding Investment Banking, Though High Rates May Still Hamper Results

Ratings Outlook May Be As Good As It Gets


U.S. Domestic 'AAAm' Money Market Fund Trends (Fourth-Quarter 2023)

(Editor's Note: For insights on rated local government investment pools, see "'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools Trends," published Nov. 1, 2023.)

'AAAm' Money Market Fund Indicators

S&P Global Ratings' 'AAAm' MMF indicators are metrics of U.S. domestic managed funds that seek to maintain principal value and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk, as defined in our principal stability fund ratings criteria. These MMF indicators provide a benchmarking tool of the 'A-1+' credit quality, portfolio composition, maturity distribution, net asset movements, and yields of 'AAAm' principal stability rated funds.

The MMF indicators demonstrate the investment practices of funds conforming to the principal stability fund rating criteria. An individual fund's metrics below that of the S&P Global Ratings' 'AAAm' MMF indicators may indicate a more conservative approach to investment, while a fund's risk metrics well above the average may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit undertaken within the 'AAAm' principal stability fund rating constraints.

Money Market Fund Assets Reach New Heights

Assets in MMFs grew to record levels once again in the fourth quarter. Rated government and prime MMFs both increased roughly 3% to $3.3 trillion and $263 billion, respectively. Annual growth in 2023 was higher than in prior years, mainly because cash was a highly attractive asset class and banking stress in the U.S. drove investors to diversify their liquidity sources. Rated government MMF assets grew 18% and prime MMF assets rose 25% during the year.

Chart 1

image

Yields for rated MMFs didn't move quarter-over-quarter for the first time since 2021. However, over the course of the year, yields increased approximately 140 basis points (bps) for rated government and prime MMFs. Quarter-end yields ranged from 4.4% to 5.4% for rated government funds and 5.3% to 5.6% for prime funds.

Table 1

AAAm' principal stability funds seven-day net yield (%)
Index Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' government MMFs 4.3 4.7 5.2 5.2
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' prime MMFs 4.3 4.7 5.4 5.4
MMF--Money market fund.

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

After four interest rate hikes earlier in 2023, the Federal Reserve didn't raise rates in the fourth quarter. With recessionary signals failing to manifest, portfolio managers are now turning their attention to a potential policy change to rate cuts. Based on current data, S&P Global Ratings economists expect a pivot to cutting in mid-2024, with the policy rate landing at 4.6% by the end of the year. (see "Economic Outlook: U.S. Q1 2024: Cooling Off But Not Breaking," published Nov. 27, 2023).

Credit In Context: Exposures In Money Markets Funds

Treasury bill issuance remained robust in the fourth quarter. Based on Securities Industry and Financial Markets Assn. (SIFMA) data, bill to outstanding debt moved slightly higher than the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee's 15%-20% target. Managers of rated government funds absorbed much of this issuance. Average Treasury bill exposure increased to 32% from 25% over the quarter. Consequently, repurchase agreements (repo) purchases declined, with average weightings reduced to 44% from 55%. This was also reflected in use of the Fed's Reverse Repo Program (RRP). According to the St. Louis Fed's data, RRP volumes fell below $1 trillion during the quarter.

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Rated prime funds also purchased a small portion of the Treasury bill issuance, with average exposure increasing to approximately 2% throughout the fourth quarter. Managers bought additional asset-backed commercial paper, of which there was higher net issuance during the last quarter relative to the prior three quarters, based on SIFMA data. Weightings in repo, certificates of deposits (CDs), and commercial paper (CP) were stable. However, managers moved into fixed CDs and CP as floating-rate positions matured. The most notable allocation change for the year overall was a slow shift out of overnight bank deposits and into CDs, reflecting managers' intentions to extend maturities and add yield. (See Chart 6)

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Earlier in 2023, effective 'A-1+' credit quality of rated government funds and especially prime funds migrated downward as managers invested further out the curve. In the fourth quarter, effective 'A-1+' credit quality for rated government and prime funds stabilized, with essentially no movement quarter-over-quarter.

Table 2

'AAAm' principal stability funds 'A-1+' credit quality (%)
Index Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' government MMFs 97 97 96 96
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' prime MMFs 67 64 62 62
MMF--Money market fund.

Chart 8

image

MMF Managers Not Finished Extending

With greater conviction about the direction of interest rates, managers further extended the maturity profiles of rated government and prime MMFs by rolling off floating-rate positions and purchasing longer-dated fixed tenors. We previously predicted that weighted average maturities (WAMs) could extend rapidly if Fed rate policy reversed. The Fed hasn't begun cutting rates, but portfolio managers of rated MMFs increased WAM 13 days for government funds and eight days for prime funds, demonstrating their view that the hiking cycle is likely over. Extension in rated government funds exceeded that of prime funds in the fourth quarter, but prime strategies began extending earlier in the year relative to government funds.

Table 3

'AAAm' principal stability funds weighted average maturity (in days)
Index Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' government MMFs 16 23 25 38
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' prime MMFs 22 30 32 40
MMF--Money market funds.

Chart 9

image

Stability In Money Market Funds

The distribution of NAV per share for rated MMFs remained in a tight range. NAV movement of rated funds was biased towards the upside on a quarter-over-quarter basis. At quarter-end, the range for rated fund NAVs was 0.9994-1.0010.

Chart 10

image

Top 10 U.S. Domiciled 'AAAm' MMFs—Government And Prime--By Assets--Key Statistics

Table 4

S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' US$ principal stability funds--government
PSFR Fund name Net assets --Portfolio maturity (days)-- Portfolio credit quality 'A-1+' (%)
WAM (R) WAM (F)
AAAm JPMorgan U.S. Government Money Market Fund 268,118 49 101 91
AAAm Goldman Sachs Money Market Funds - Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund 228,491 53 115 95
AAAm Fidelity Investments Money Market Government Portfolio 187,780 26 73 97
AAAm JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market Fund 175,782 50 82 100
AAAm Federated Hermes Government Obligations Fund 157,943 33 97 90
AAAm State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Portfolio 150,853 46 76 95
AAAm BlackRock Liquidity Funds FedFund 147,054 36 75 95
AAAm Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio 145,754 44 91 96
AAAm Allspring Government Money Market Fund 124,289 41 91 91
AAAm Dreyfus Government Cash Management 118,031 41 92 91
PSFR--Principal stability fund rating.

Table 5

S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' US$ principal stability funds--prime
PSFR Fund name Net assets --Portfolio maturity (days)-- Portfolio credit quality 'A-1+' (%)
WAM (R) WAM (F)
AAAm JPMorgan Prime Money Market Fund 77,058 47 63 100
AAAm Federated Hermes Prime Cash Obligations Fund 65,370 38 74 56
AAAm Federated Hermes Institutional Prime Obligations 19,627 38 63 55
AAAm Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Prime Portfolio 16,576 57 79 71
AAAm State Street Money Market Portfolio 14,164 42 62 63
AAAm BlackRock Liquidity Funds TempCash 13,896 44 57 70
AAAm Western Asset Institutional Liquid Reserves 11,898 44 69 63
AAAm Dreyfus Cash Management 6,453 20 21 79
AAAm Invesco Premier Portfolio 5,969 46 72 71
AAAm BlackRock Liquidity Funds TempFund 5,170 45 58 70
PSFR--Principal stability fund rating.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Marissa Zuccaro, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4762;
marissa.zuccaro@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642;
michael.masih@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in