articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240220-s-p-global-ratings-has-lowered-its-north-american-and-european-gas-price-assumptions-for-2024-and-2025-13009434.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

S&P Global Ratings Has Lowered Its North American And European Gas Price Assumptions For 2024 And 2025

COMMENTS

South And Southeast Asia Unicorns: A New Credit Story Post-IPO

COMMENTS

China GRE Ratings List

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How South And Southeast Asian Firms Will Fare As Currencies Depreciate

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: A Look At Why South And Southeast Asian Firms Are Standing Up To A Strong Dollar


S&P Global Ratings Has Lowered Its North American And European Gas Price Assumptions For 2024 And 2025

S&P Global Ratings has reviewed its hydrocarbon price deck and has lowered its Henry Hub, Canadian Alberta Energy Co. (AECO), and Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF) natural gas price assumptions for the remainder of 2024 and 2025 (see table). We maintain our Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price assumptions for the remainder of 2024 and subsequent years. Additionally, we have added 2027 annual assumptions for these hydrocarbons.

Table 1

S&P Global Ratings' oil and natural gas price assumptions
New prices Old prices
WTI ($/bbl) Brent ($/bbl) Henry Hub ($/mmBtu) AECO ($/mmBtu) TTF ($/mmBtu) WTI ($/bbl) Brent ($/bbl) Henry Hub ($/mmBtu) AECO ($/mmBtu) TTF ($/mmBtu)
Remainder of 2024 80 85 2.5 1.75 10 80 85 3.25 2.25 14
2025 80 85 3.5 2.5 10 80 85 4 2.75 12
2026 80 85 4.25 3.25 10 80 85 4.25 3.25 10
2027 and beyond 80 85 4.25 3.25 10
bbl--Barrel. WTI--West Texas Intermediate. HH--Henry Hub. TTF--Title Transfer Facility. AECO--Alberta Energy Co. mmBtu--Million British thermal units. Note: Prices are rounded to the nearest $5/bbl and 25 cents/mmBtu. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

The decline in our gas price deck in 2024 is somewhat meaningful, though we anticipate limited rating impact. We note that many of the producers have focused on reducing debt over the past several years and some producers benefit from hedges.

To calibrate the potential use of cash flow volatility adjustments and the resilience of the financial risk profile and ratings, we maintain a ratings midcycle price reference point to be used in our analysis of oil and gas producers. These midcycle prices are unchanged at $50/$55 per barrel of oil equivalent for both WTI and Brent and $2.75/$2.25/$8 per metric million British thermal units (mmBtu) for natural gas prices as determined by Henry Hub, AECO, and the TTF.

We typically publish our price decks at least every quarter. We may also publish when there are significant changes to S&P Global Ratings Commodity Insights' forecasts or when the hydrocarbon futures curves persistently deviate by more than 20% from our published decks. Our corporate analysts continue to use the first three years in their modelling, analysis, and determining of ratings for exploration and production companies. For further information, see, "Credit FAQ: How S&P Global Ratings Formulates, Uses, And Reviews Commodity Price Assumptions," published April 20, 2023.

Natural Gas Prices Reflect Exceptionally High Inventory Levels

Chart 1

image

Henry Hub

The price of Henry Hub has plummeted, attributed to a warm winter because of the El Niño and record U.S. natural gas production in 2023. As of Feb. 9, 2024, working gas storage in the U.S. was at 2,535 billion cubic feet (Bcf), the highest it has been for this time of the year since 2016. Storage levels are 16% higher than the five-year average and 11% higher than the same period in 2023.

Chart 2

image

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration thus far in the withdrawal season (November through March) the average rate of withdrawals from storage is 12% lower than the five-year average. If the rate of withdrawals from storage matched the five-year average of 10.9 Bcf per day for the remainder of the withdrawal season, the total inventory on March 31, 2024 would still be approximately 20% higher than the five-year average for the end of the withdrawal season.

We consider it likely that producers will accordingly lower natural gas-directed rigs. However, the corresponding decline in production will take about four to six months which, coupled with inventory levels that will likely remain high exiting the heating season, will subdue any meaningful movement in natural gas prices. Much of the U.S. gas production is from associated gas from oil production, particularly from the Permian Basin. With WTI rising over the last few weeks, increased oil production could boost gas supplies. Producers are demonstrating efficiency and productivity gains, and some may utilize drilled but uncompleted wells to garner higher netbacks--which could quickly increase production and further pressure natural gas prices.

AECO

Like Henry Hub, warmer-than-expected weather conditions have created significant volatility in AECO prices. Canadian natural gas production reached an all-time high in 2023, resulting in record storage levels in western Canada to start the heating season. One of the warmest Canadian winters in the last century significantly reduced space heating demand and kept storage levels extraordinarily elevated. Canadian gas-directed rigs have simultaneously remained stubbornly high, because producers are holding production flat in anticipation of the startup of Canadian liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facilities in early 2025. The combination of these factors has weighed on AECO prices, with prices dropping steeply over the recent weeks, currently trading at about US$1.30 per mmBtu.

Chart 3

image

We forecast that storage inventories will remain above the five-year average into 2025 even if weather patterns and temperatures return to normal levels later in 2024. This is because Canada's working gas storage levels are at or near all-time highs for this time of year and production is expected to remain flat.

Chart 4

image

The start of LNG Canada Phase 1 in early 2025 (with an export capacity of about 2 Bcf per day) will be positive for domestic demand. It is likely that project sponsors will ramp up production to meet most of this new demand, using either their own acreage or partners. As a result, we anticipate high-single-digit yearly growth in Canadian natural gas production in 2025. We expect the startup of domestic LNG exports to provide less upward price support to the AECO benchmark in 2025 than previously anticipated. This is because of the possibility of elevated storage levels persisting into 2025, coupled with a higher Canadian gas production forecast.

TTF

We have lowered our TTF assumptions for 2024 and 2025. This reflects subdued European demand based on a warm winter and a weak economic recovery. It also considers soft global LNG prices, because supply remains abundant and is set to grow from next winter, and Asia-Pacific's demand recovery is well priced in. We anticipate demand moderation, at a quarter below 2019 levels, as households and industries barely increase consumption and gas-to-power use reduces sharply. Subdued power consumption, gas and coal-fired generation being displaced by growth of about 10% in renewables, and recovering hydro and French nuclear generation support this view.

The EU's underground natural gas inventory levels are high for this time of the year, at 65% of capacity as of Feb. 17, 2024. With only about six weeks of significant potential withdrawals left, we forecast a very healthy winter exit level of about or above 50%.

Physical constraints on delivering LNG to continental Europe, and specifically to Central and Eastern Europe, are no longer material. Half a dozen new floating regasification units send gas to the grid, part of a 75 billion cubic meters per year regasification capacity increase over 2022-2024, which focuses on the regions previously most dependent on Russia (such as Italy and Central and Eastern Europe).

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Emmanuel Dubois-Pelerin, Paris + 33 14 420 6673;
emmanuel.dubois-pelerin@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Thomas A Watters, New York + 1 (212) 438 7818;
thomas.watters@spglobal.com
Simon Redmond, London + 44 20 7176 3683;
simon.redmond@spglobal.com
Laura Collins, Toronto +1 4165072575;
laura.collins1@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in