Key Takeaways
- Rating actions in 2023 reflect the sector's stability as most projects benefitted from higher basic allowance for housing (BAH) revenue and strong occupancy.
- Operating pressure could materialize if military recruiting targets trend below expectations, leading to less demand for military housing projects. While we don't believe this is an immediate risk, it could affect credit quality over the medium-to-long term.
- Debt service coverage for military housing projects has experienced some volatility due to increasing costs from insurance coverage, utility expense, and maintenance and repair requirements.
Chart 1
S&P Global Rating Actions In 2023 Reflect Stability
Military housing bond ratings are among the strongest in the public finance rental housing sector:
- 'AA' or 'A' category: 86% of public ratings.
- All but one of the 92 public ratings are rated in the 'BBB' category or higher.
- An overwhelming majority, or 98% of public ratings, carry a stable outlook, with the remaining 2% on positive outlook.
In 2023, we affirmed 24 of our outstanding ratings, raised 11 ratings, and lowered one rating. Our only downgraded issuer, Corvias Military Living LLC's (CML) series 2010 certificates issued for Fort Sill, was due to our view of declining cash flow, but we subsequently raised the rating on receipt of updated information detailing extraordinary one-time operating expenses that were covered from funds outside of the project's cash-flow. Upgrades primarily reflected BAH growth and occupancy improvement, leading to stronger financial profiles.
Consistent BAH Rate Increases Support Project Revenues
The BAH, a component of compensation for service members of the U.S. Military, support projects in the form of predicable and stable revenue trends. The Department of Defense's (DoD) budget line-item for BAH, the primary source of revenue for the projects we rate, steadily increased by about 5.3% annually on average from 2021 to 2023. In late 2023, DoD announced that BAH rates will again increase substantially in 2024, providing projects with additional financial buffer, which we think will lead to another year of stability in the military housing sector.
Table 1
Basic Allowance for Housing and pay and allowances by year | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024* | ||||||||
BAH (officer) (billions $) | 5.92 | 6.27 | 6.51 | 7.04 | 7.50 | |||||||
BAH (enlisted) (billions $) | 14.97 | 16.12 | 16.50 | 17.35 | 18.75 | |||||||
Total BAH Appropriated (billions $) | 20.89 | 22.40 | 23.02 | 24.39 | 26.26 | |||||||
Annual BAH increase (%) | 0.03 | 7.19 | 2.77 | 5.96 | 7.66 | |||||||
Total pay and allowances, officer (billions $) | 35.80 | 39.06 | 40.06 | 42.19 | 43.09 | |||||||
Total pay and allowances, enlisted (billions $) | 75.33 | 82.01 | 83.32 | 85.38 | 88.12 | |||||||
Total pay and allowances, including BAH (millions $) | 111.13 | 121.07 | 123.38 | 127.57 | 131.21 | |||||||
*Requested. | ||||||||||||
Source: Comptroller, Department of Defense. |
Chart 2
Resilient Occupancy And Demand
Occupancy over the three years ended June 30, 2023, ranged from 93.1% to 93.4% across our rated universe, mostly stemming from solid demand for family units on base and, typically, a lack of affordable units off base. Stable occupancy year-over-year, coupled with increasing BAH rates, have underpinned healthy operating results for most of our rated projects.
Exceptions to the overall trend are what we view as base-specific issues:
- Fort Eisenhower Housing LLC (formerly Fort Gordon). Occupancy through fiscal 2022 significantly deteriorated from several factors, including: fallout from recent media reports and federal oversight actions, a competitive rental market, and a large renovation project that will take as many as 238 units off-line during construction. (See "Fort Eisenhower Housing LLC, Georgia; Military Housing," published Dec. 15, 2023).
- New Orleans Navy Housing LLC. Occupancy through fiscal 2022 declined from the previous year as a result of significant hurricane damage that displaced residents. Year-to-date fiscal 2023 physical occupancy increased to 85.94% from 78.78%, according to rent rolls, as it completes the necessary property renovations. (See "New Orleans Navy Housing LLC; Military Housing," published July 26, 2023).
U.S. Military Personnel Levels Trend Negatively
One trend that could disrupt the sector's stability is continued decline in domestic active-duty personnel. Between 2020 to 2023, the number of U.S. based service members decreased by 5.1%, or a total of more than 52,000 personnel. The DoD has struggled to reach its enlistment goals in the post pandemic era, as the Army, Navy, and Air Force all fell short of their recruiting targets for 2023. According to the U.S. Army recruiting command, recruitment is down due to a variety of factors, including the tight U.S. labor market, lack of military service awareness, and declining physical and mental fitness among potential recruits, typically young adults between the ages of 18 and 24. While the military housing projects that S&P Global Ratings rates serves only a fraction of the population at a given installation, continued declines in enlistment could lower demand for military housing in the medium to long term.
Chart 3
Rising Expenditures May Pressure Projects With Already Narrow Margins
While operating incomes at privatized military projects are stable overall, we have observed increasing expenses from maintenance and repair, utilities, and insurance.
Renovations and repairs
Many rated privatized military housing projects have been in operation for 20 or more years, resulting in significant needs for upgrades and renovations to remain competitive with off-base options. From fiscal 2021 to 2022, overall maintenance and repair costs jumped 7.5% due to inflationary pressures on building materials, labor shortages, the growing needs of aging housing stock, and enhanced resiliency upgrades for projects exposed to extreme weather conditions. Our analysis of maintenance and repair expense is adjusted for both deposits into the project's Capital Repair and Replacement fund (CRR) and capital expenses funded through the account. Average maintenance and repair per unit in fiscal 2022 was about $363, an increase from $337 in fiscal 2021. While fiscal years 2023 and 2024 totals are unavailable as of the date of this article, we expect maintenance and repair costs to remain high as projects continue delivering necessary renovation and repair in a higher cost environment.
Legislation restricting additional debt issuance secured by military housing properties has led some owners to take a financing approach where surplus cash flow or residual revenue from mature military housing projects are securitized to fund longer term capital repair and renovation expenditures. Excess cash flow from multiple military housing developments are collected and cross-collateralized for debt service payments, while bond proceeds fund capital reinvestments at the military housing developments. In our view, these debt funded renovations and repairs could improve the quality of the properties while also reducing annual repair expenses. (See "MMH Master LLC, NJ Series 2024A Military Housing Project Class I Bonds Rated ‘BBB+’; Outlook Is Stable," published Feb. 16, 2024.)
Utility costs
Geopolitical tension and inflation spiked commodity prices resulting in utility costs increasing 12.1% in fiscal 2022. Although costs declined somewhat in fiscal 2023 as oil and natural gas prices fell, a resurgence of some supply chain bottlenecks and conflicts in energy producing regions could reverse the improving trends observed in 2023.
Insurance
After a sharp one-year increase of 29.2% in fiscal 2021, the average insurance expense from our rated projects decreased by 2.1% in 2022. However, this modest decrease follows several years of compounding material increases. Given the sustained increase in insurance premiums and the expectation that these costs will continue escalating, some military housing operators have either chosen to, or were required to, implement self-insurance. For example, Balfour Beatty, which maintains a master insurance policy covering its entire military housing portfolio, was required by the insurer to implement a $25 million self-insured retention for losses funded at a pro rata portion of claims incurred by project. Under this plan, the insurer provides full insurance coverage only after the $25 million in claims are met and allocated by the fund. High insurance costs are unlikely to decline in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 as insurers seek to align premiums with property and casualty losses.
Chart 4
Renaming Completed
In 2023, the U.S. Army finalized changing the names of bases originally named for Confederate figures. A summary is below:
- Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia–renamed Fort Walker
- Fort Benning, Georgia–renamed Fort Moore
- Fort Bragg, North Carolina–renamed Fort Liberty
- Fort Gordon, Georgia–renamed Fort Eisenhower
- Fort Hood, Texas–renamed Fort Cavazos
- Fort Lee, Virginia–renamed Fort Gregg-Adams
- Fort Pickett, Virginia–renamed Fort Barfoot
- Fort Polk, Louisiana–renamed Fort Johnson
- Fort Rucker, Alabama–renamed Fort Novosel
Table 2
Military Housing Rental Bond Rating, as of February 2024 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Entity | State | Rating | Outlook | Lien |
Aberdeen Proving Ground Family Housing LLC |
Maryland | A+ | Stable | 1st |
ACC GROUP Housing LLC |
Delaware | AA | Stable | 1st |
AMC East Communities LLC |
Delaware | A | Stable | 1st |
AMC East Communities LLC |
Delaware | A | Stable | 2nd |
AMC West Housing LP |
Pennsylvania | AA | Stable | 1st |
Atlantic Marine Corps Communities LLC |
North Carolina | A- | Stable | 1st |
Atlantic Marine Corps Communities LLC |
North Carolina | BBB | Stable | 2nd |
Atlantic Marine Corps Communities LLC |
North Carolina | BBB | Stable | 3rd |
Aurora Military Housing I LLC |
Alaska | AA | Stable | 1st |
Aurora Military Housing II LLC |
Alaska | AA | Stable | 1st |
Aurora Military Housing II LLC |
Alaska | AA- | Stable | 2nd |
Aurora Military Housing III LLC |
Alaska | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Belvoir Land LLC |
Virginia | AA | Stable | 1st |
Belvoir Land LLC |
Virginia | AA | Stable | 2nd |
Belvoir Land LLC |
Virginia | A+ | Stable | 3rd |
Boyer Hill Military Housing LC |
Utah | AA | Stable | 1st |
Boyer Hill Military Housing LC |
Utah | AA | Stable | 2nd |
Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC |
California | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Capmark Military Housing Trust XXXIV |
Delaware | A+ | Stable | 1st |
Corvias Military Living LLC |
Rhode Island | A | Stable | 1st |
Fort Benning Family Communities LLC |
Georgia | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Fort Benning Family Community LLC |
Georgia | A | Stable | 2nd |
Fort Benning Family Communities LLC |
Georgia | BBB+ | Stable | 3rd |
Fort Carson Family Housing LLC |
Colorado | AA | Stable | 1st |
Fort Drum Mountain Community Homes LLC |
Texas | BBB+ | Stable | 1st |
Fort Drum Mountain Community Homes LLC |
New York | BBB+ | Stable | 1st |
Fort Eustis/Fort Story Housing LLC |
Virginia | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Fort Eustis/Fort Story Housing LLC |
Virginia | A+ | Stable | 2nd |
Fort Eustis/Fort Story Housing LLC |
Virginia | A | Stable | 3rd |
Fort Eisenhower Housing LLC |
Georgia | BBB | Stable | 1st |
Fort Eisenhower Housing LLC |
Georgia | BBB- | Stable | 2nd |
Fort Hamilton Housing LLC |
Pennsylvania | A | Stable | 1st |
Fort Hamilton Housing LLC |
Pennsylvania | BBB+ | Stable | 2nd |
Fort Hood Family Housing LLC |
Texas | A | Stable | 1st |
Fort Huachuca-YPG Arizona Communities LLC |
Arizona | A- | Stable | 1st |
Fort Irwin Land LLC |
California | AA | Stable | 1st |
Fort Irwin Land LLC |
California | AA- | Stable | 2nd |
Fort Irwin Land LLC |
California | A | Stable | 3rd |
Fort Jackson Housing LLC |
South Carolina | A | Stable | 1st |
Fort Sam Houston, LP. |
Texas | AA | Stable | 1st |
Fort Sam Houston, LP. |
Texas | AA | Stable | 2nd |
GMAC Commercial Military Housing Trust XVI |
Washington | AA- | Stable | 1st |
GMAC Commercial Military Housing Trust XXI |
Texas | BBB+ | Stable | 1st |
GMAC Commercial Military Housing Trust XXI |
Texas | BBB+ | Stable | 1st |
GMH Military Housing - Navy Northeast LLC |
Pennsylvania | A+ | Stable | 1st |
GMH Military Housing - Navy Northeast LLC |
Pennsylvania | BBB+ | Stable | 2nd |
HP Communities LLC |
Colorado | AA | Stable | 1st |
HP Communities LLC |
Colorado | AA- | Stable | 2nd |
HP Communities LLC |
Colorado | A+ | Stable | 3rd |
Hunt Southern Group LLC |
Texas | A | Stable | 1st |
Island Palm Communities LLC |
Hawaii | AA | Stable | 1st |
Island Palm Communities LLC |
Hawaii | AA- | Stable | 2nd |
Island Palm Communities LLC |
Hawaii | A+ | Stable | 3rd |
Island Palm Communities LLC / Army Hawaii Family Housing Trust |
Hawaii | AA | Stable | 1st |
Knox Hills LLC |
Kentucky | A+ | Stable | 1st |
Knox Hills LLC |
Kentucky | A | Stable | 2nd |
Lackland Family Housing Phase II |
Texas | A | Stable | 1st |
Leonard Wood Family Communities LLC |
Missouri | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Leonard Wood Family Communities LLC |
Missouri | A | Stable | 2nd |
Leonard Wood Family Communities LLC |
Missouri | A- | Stable | 3rd |
Lewis-McChord Communities LLC |
Washington | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Lewis-McChord Communities LLC |
Washington | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Mid-Atlantic Military Family Communities LLC |
Virginia | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Mid-Atlantic Military Family Communities LLC |
Virginia | A- | Stable | 3rd |
Midwest Family Housing LLC |
Illinois | AA | Stable | 1st |
Midwest Family Housing LLC |
Illinois | AA | Stable | 2nd |
Midwest Family Housing LLC |
Illinois | A+ | Positive | 3rd |
Midwest Family Housing LLC |
Illinois | A | Positive | 4th |
Monterey Bay Military Housing, LLC |
California | A+ | Stable | 1st |
New Orleans Navy Housing LLC |
Louisiana | A+ | Stable | 1st |
Northern Group Housing LLC |
New York | AA | Stable | 1st |
Offutt AFB America First Communities LLC |
Nebraska | AA | Stable | 1st |
Offutt AFB America First Communities LLC |
Nebraska | AA- | Stable | 2nd |
Ohana Military Communities LLC |
Hawaii | AA- | Stable | 1st |
Ohana Military Communities LLC |
Hawaii | A+ | Stable | 2nd |
Ohana Military Communities LLC |
Hawaii | A | Stable | 3rd |
Pacific Beacon LLC |
California | AA | Stable | 1st |
Pacific Beacon LLC |
California | AA- | Stable | 2nd |
Pacific Beacon LLC |
California | A+ | Stable | 3rd |
Pacific Northwest Communities, LLC |
Washington | AA | Stable | 1st |
Pacific Northwest Communities, LLC |
Washington | AA | Stable | 2nd |
San Diego Family Housing LLC |
California | AA | Stable | 1st |
San Diego Family Housing LLC |
California | AA | Stable | 2nd |
San Diego Family Housing LLC |
California | AA | Stable | 3rd |
South Texas Military Housing LP |
Texas | BBB- | Stable | 1st |
Southeast Housing LLC-Navy Southeast Family Housing |
Delaware | A- | Stable | 1st |
Tierra Vista Communities LLC |
Delaware | A+ | Stable | 1st |
Tierra Vista Communities LLC |
Delaware | A- | Stable | 2nd |
Tri Command Military Housing LLC |
South Carolina | B+ | Stable | 1st |
United Communities LLC |
New Jersey | AA | Stable | 1st |
West Point Housing LLC |
New York | A | Negative | 1st |
Western Group Housing LP |
Pennsylvania | AA | Stable | 1st |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Raymond S Kim, New York + 1 (212) 438 2005; raymond.kim@spglobal.com |
Sam Krouse, Austin (1) 214-871-1409; sam.krouse@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Joan H Monaghan, Denver + 1 (303) 721 4401; Joan.Monaghan@spglobal.com |
Nora G Wittstruck, New York + (212) 438-8589; nora.wittstruck@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.