articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240613-your-three-minutes-in-california-groundwater-tulare-lake-subbasin-s-probation-may-herald-more-restrictions-13143051.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In California Groundwater: Tulare Lake Subbasin's Probation May Herald More Restrictions, Rating Changes

COMMENTS

History Of U.S. State Ratings

COMMENTS

U.S. State Ratings And Outlooks: Current List

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Outstanding Ratings And Outlooks As Of June 30, 2024


Your Three Minutes In California Groundwater: Tulare Lake Subbasin's Probation May Herald More Restrictions, Rating Changes

A California groundwater subbasin's probation placement could pressure the revenue and pricing power of 40 San Joaquin Valley municipal water, sewer, and utility districts.   S&P Global Ratings also believes it could influence agricultural output, depress land value, raise water production costs, and ultimately force land out of agricultural use and raise household bills.

Chart 1

image

What's Happening

On April 16, 2024, the California State Water Resorces Control Board placed the Tulare Lake Groundwater Subbasin on probation under the decade-old Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. The 837-square mile subbasin is in the San Joaquin Valley--home to some of the largest landowners and agribusinesses in the country. We believe the board is likely to take similar action against five similarly "critically overdrafted" San Joaquin Valley basins later this year.

Chart 2

image

Why It Matters

We see several key risks for rated credits in the region:

Groundwater depletion can cause land to physically collapse, damaging critical infrastructure.   Some places in the subbasin have sank more than a foot annually, more than almost any other area in the country. A massive sink hole has formed beneath the city of Corcoran. Elsewhere, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Friant-Kern Canal has lost more than 60% of its carrying capacity and continues to sink despite $500 million in state, federal, and local improvements.

Winners and losers are unclear.   Some water managers, farmers and municipalities in the affected regions took steps to reduce their water consumption and finance costly new water supplies, while others have not. A "one size fits all" penalty that limits everyone in the region uniformly fails to recognize the efforts of those who already made significant supply diversification or conservation investments. We believe they could be penalized for their good management by having to pay for other entities' deficiencies.

Longer-term influence on local jobs and economic output could be widespread.   Farmland retirement and fallowing could disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities whose economies revolve around farmwork. If this impacts incomes it could soften sales, property tax collections, and school enrollments, which could lead to deteriorating local government finances.

Protecting groundwater levels can be expensive.   The solution to land subsidence is either reduced groundwater consumption or bolstered recharge. Recharge requires access to an alternative water supply, of which the availability of new sources in California (and much of the west) is limited. Further, physical trades of water surpluses may be critical for long-term water resiliency, but without a robust water market, these trades are typically short term and future purchases aren't guaranteed.

What Comes Next

Probation requires:

  • Installation of flow meters by July 15 for customers who pump more than 500-acre feet annually.
  • Those customers must submit annual usage reports by Dec. 1.
  • Unprecedented groundwater pumping fees include: $20 per acre-foot pumped and $300 annual registration. 
  • If deficiencies in the subbasin's plan aren't fixed in a year, the state may enact restrictions that could raise agricultural production costs, lead to fallowing, pressure local communities, and trigger rating actions on as many as 22 municipal utilities and 18 water districts.

Groundwater overpumping is not exclusive to the Central Valley. Nationwide, aquifers are in decline and other states could follow California's lead.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Chloe S Weil, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5026;
chloe.weil@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Jenny Poree, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5044;
jenny.poree@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in