articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240709-your-three-minutes-in-malaysia-s-islamic-banking-funding-fix-may-be-a-five-year-wait-13173129 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Malaysia's Islamic Banking: Funding Fix May Be A Five-Year Wait

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of July 24, 2024

COMMENTS

History Of U.S. State Ratings

COMMENTS

U.S. State Ratings And Outlooks: Current List

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: Are The Olympics A Budgetary Burden For Paris?


Your Three Minutes In Malaysia's Islamic Banking: Funding Fix May Be A Five-Year Wait

Banks' efforts to improve funding profiles could yield results in three to five years.  The funding profiles of Malaysia's Islamic banks will likely stay weaker than that of the overall sector, reflecting structural weakness in attracting low-cost retail deposits. The funding costs of Islamic banks are highly sensitive to rate increases. This is because of their lower share of low-cost demand and savings deposits (27% compared with the sector's 31%) and a higher share of costlier wholesale deposits (71% compared with the sector's 64%).

What's happening

Islamic banks saw a sharper contraction in net financing margins in 2023 than conventional banks.   This was due to the upward repricing of term deposits and intense competition of deposit rates. The decline was sharper than the contraction in net interest margins at conventional banks. For the Islamic bank subsidiaries of rated Malaysian banks, margins contracted 34 basis points on average compared with 27 basis points at the group level. The profitability of Malaysian Islamic banks is generally in line with that of the overall banking sector, but in 2023 the gap widened, with return on assets of 1.0% versus the 1.2% for the sector.

Why it matters

Funding challenges could constrain Islamic banks' growth and profitability.   Islamic banking drives Malaysia's growth story given many large banks adhere to an "Islamic first" strategy. Financing growth could moderate if growth in low-cost deposits continues to lag.

Profitability could stay lower than the sector in 2024 as well. Elevated deposit rates are exacerbated by intense competition for pricing household loans and financing in Malaysia's saturated banking sector. Islamic banks also tend to have a higher share of hire-purchase financing. Given these are fixed rate, margins don't expand as quickly because adjustments to financing rates only happen with a significant lag to interest rate hikes.

Standalone Islamic banks face elevated funding risks.  In our view, Islamic bank subsidiaries of large banking groups are better positioned to manage this risk as they can benefit from intra-group funding. Standalone Islamic banks are on a relatively weaker footing and may face a contraction in their market share.

What comes next

Management actions could gradually fix the problem.   Banks continue to ramp up efforts on growing Islamic deposits through promotional rates, campaigns, better service, and ease of migration of low-cost demand and savings accounts from conventional to Islamic. The sector has also been gradually diversifying its funding sources; for example, by increasing funding from investment accounts.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Nikita Anand, Singapore + 65 6216 1050;
nikita.anand@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Geeta Chugh, Mumbai + 912233421910;
geeta.chugh@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in