articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241030-credit-trends-risky-credits-emerging-markets-issuance-activity-and-deleveraging-plans-13302410.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Credit Trends: Risky Credits: Emerging Markets: Issuance Activity And Deleveraging Plans

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of Dec. 4, 2024

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of Nov. 27, 2024

COMMENTS

This Month In Credit: 2024 Data Companion

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of Nov. 20, 2024


Credit Trends: Risky Credits: Emerging Markets: Issuance Activity And Deleveraging Plans

(Editor's Note: Our "Risky Credits" series focuses on corporate issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower in emerging markets. Because many defaults are of companies in these categories, ratings with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch negative are even more important to monitor.)

image

Emerging market issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower declined to 13 in third-quarter 2024, from 15 in the second quarter (chart 1).  These issuers, known as risky credits, accounted for 9.6% of speculative-grade issuers as of September 2024, slightly lower than in June (10.5%) and lower than a year ago. This was mostly due to a decrease in speculative-grade issuers.

Brazil-based Azul S.A. (transport sector) joined the risky credits list when S&P Global Ratings downgraded it to 'CCC+' from 'B-' and assigned a negative outlook to the long-term rating. This reflected softer-than-expected first-half 2024 results caused by the depreciation of the Brazilian real and a reduction in capacity and yields. This widened its free operating cash flow (FOCF) deficit for the year and weakened its liquidity.

We withdrew our 'CCC+' global scale rating on Mexico-based Grupo GICSA (real estate) at the issuer's request.

Three risky credits defaulted between July and September 2024.  We downgraded CLISA-Compania Latinoamericana de Infraestructura & Servicios S.A. (Argentina; capital goods) to 'SD' from 'CC' on the missed interest payment on its $358 million senior secured notes. The devaluation of the Argentine peso in 2024 increased the company's interest burden because most of its debt was denominated in foreign currency. Moreover, high inflation dented CLISA's EBITDA margin.

Mexico-based Operadora de Servicios Mega, S.A. de C.V. SOFOM, E.R. (a nonbank financial institute) defaulted from 'CC' because it failed to make an interest payment on its $352 million unsecured notes due February 2025. Liquidity pressures, portfolio quality deterioration, and higher funding costs all eroded its already weak margins.

Also in Mexico, Grupo Idesa S.A. de C.V. (chemicals) received a 97.3% approval from bondholders on its cash tender offer on the full principal amount of its 6.5% senior notes due October 2028 (20% below par as proposed by the company). We viewed the proposed tender offer as tantamount to a default because creditors received less than originally promised. The chemical industry has been suffering from oversupply in Asia and high inventory, leading to weaker prices. Combined with subdued demand, this has weakened the company's cash flow and coverage ratios; our rating shifted rapidly from 'B-' to 'CCC+' to 'CCC' and finally to 'SD' in the space of one month. We subsequently withdrew the rating at the issuer's request.

With three months to go, eight emerging markets entities had defaulted, compared to 10 in 2023.  Emerging markets currently display a lower default rate than developed regions. As of August 2024, the 12-month trailing speculative-grade default rate was 1.6% for emerging markets compared to 4.75% in Europe and 4.29% in the U.S. (12-month trailing speculative-grade default rates for the U.S. and Europe are through Sept. 30, 2024, and are preliminary and subject to change).

Chart 1

image

The negative bias for 'CCC+' and lower rated issuers slightly increased to 31% in third-quarter 2024 from 27% in the second quarter (chart 2).  This was mostly as a result of the lower number of risky credits, with issuers with a negative outlook remaining at four. The regional distribution of negative outlooks is concentrated in Latin America, with three out of the four located in Brazil. On the other hand, the negative bias of 'B-' rated companies decreased to 0%, from 25% in the previous quarter. Indeed, two 'B-' rated companies had a negative outlook as of last quarter: Brazil-based Usina Coruripe Acucar e Alcool (consumer products) and China-based Xinhu Zhongbao Co. Ltd. (real estate). We revised our outlook on the former to stable on lower refinancing risk, triggered by improving sugar crushing volumes and cash costs. We downgraded the latter to 'CCC-' from 'B-', because of heightened refinancing risk for upcoming offshore bond maturities, before we withdrew all our ratings at the company's request.

Chart 2

image

The aggregate debt of issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower decreased slightly to $8.1 billion as of third-quarter 2024.  Argentina has the highest concentration of debt at over $6 billion and the issuers mostly have a stable outlook (chart 3). Sector-wise, Oil and Gas tops the list with $3.2 billion from YPF S.A. and Compania General de Combustibles S.A., both with a stable outlook (chart 4).

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Speculative grade issuance remained strong (chart 5).  Issuance was $6.2 billion in the third quarter, 6% higher than the second quarter, and the highest quarterly amount since third-quarter 2021. Issuance was buoyed by historically low corporate spreads: the High-Yield Fred Index decreased by 20 bps in the quarter to reach 350 bps, significantly below its 10-year average of 600 bps. Both benchmark and corporate yields decreased, with the 'CCC' iBoxx annual yield time series attaining 14.5% in September 2024, from 15.9% in June 2024. Speculative-grade issuance is still centered on the 'BB' category, with some market interest in 'B' rated issuance.

The third quarter marked the first 'CCC+' and lower issuance since November 2021.  Three Argentinian companies (Pampa Energia S.A., YPF, and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS)) tapped the international market for refinancing purposes for a cumulative $1.4 billion at an average 8.6% yield-to-maturity with a seven-year tenor. The Fed's monetary easing will likely bring capital inflows and further yield compression. However, political and macroeconomic uncertainty, coupled with geopolitical risk, could create bouts of future market volatility.

Chart 5

image

Risky credits projections still point to deleveraging amid prudent capital spending.  Chart 6 shows that issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower will further decrease leverage ratios in 2025-2026 as EBITDA growth, triggered by sound revenues, is expected to overcome nominal debt (albeit this is still expected to rise). The peak in revenues will translate into higher liquidity for companies, plateauing between 2024 and 2025 given higher interest expenses, before normalizing in 2026. The flip side is that risky credits will likely devote a smaller portion of future revenues to capital spending compared to higher rated entities. Between 2020 and 2022 capital expenditure amounted to 16% of revenues, while now the ratio is supposed to narrow to 13% in 2024-2025.

Chart 6a

image

Chart 6b

image

Chart 6c

image

Chart 6d

image

At the sector level, risky credit financials remained reasonably stable quarter-on-quarter (charts 7-9).  Below are the drivers of the most significant forecasted changes:

  • Hungarian chemical company, Nitrogenmuvek Zrt., will see its EBITDA generation increase in 2024 due to higher sales volumes after negative FOCF in 2023. The latter followed the October 2023 implementation of the Hungarian government's emission trading system (ETS), which introduced a tax on free carbon dioxide emissions allowances. The company has legally challenged the ETS decree but the outcome remains highly uncertain. We lowered our rating on the company to 'CCC' from 'CCC+' given the heightened refinancing risk associated with the senior unsecured notes that mature within a year (€200 million). This represents most of Nitrogenmuvek's debt. Its leverage is expected to stay very high around 10x in 2024 and is likely to deteriorate further in 2025.
  • In telecommunications, the average debt to EBITDA ratio has been heavily influenced by Oi S.A., which will likely post negative EBITDA from 2022 to 2025. We recently upgraded the company to 'CCC' from 'CCC-' when the completion of the debt exchange resulted in lower gross debt. The outlook is negative as the debt structure is, in our view, unsustainable in the short term and dependent on favorable events, such as asset sales and an operational turnaround.

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Emerging markets issuers rated 'CCC+' and lower
Industry Issuer name Rating Outlook/CreditWatch Outlook or CreditWatch Country Region
Bank

Banco De Galicia Y Buenos Aires S.A.U.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services

Nitrogenmuvek Zrt.

CCC Neg/Negative Outlook Hungary Europe
Homebuilders/real estate Co.

PT Kawasan Industri Jababeka Tbk.

CCC+ Stable Outlook Indonesia Asia/Pacific
Oil and gas exploration and production

YPF S.A

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Oil and gas exploration and production

Compania General de Combustibles S.A.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Telecommunications

Oi S.A.

CCC Neg/Negative Outlook Brazil Latin America
Telecommunications

Telecom Argentina S.A.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Transportation

Aeropuertos Argentina 2000 S.A.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Transportation

Investimentos e Participacoes em Infraestrutura S.A. - Invepar

CCC+ Neg/Negative Outlook Brazil Latin America
Transportation

Azul S.A.

CCC+ Neg/Negative Outlook Brazil Latin America
Utility

Empresa Distribuidora Y Comercializadora Norte S.A.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Utility

CAPEX S.A.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Utility

Pampa Energia S.A.

CCC Stable Outlook Argentina Latin America
Data as of Sept. 30, 2024. Source: S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights. Emerging markets consist of Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Mexico; Emerging Asia: India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam; EMEA: Hungary, Poland, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkiye; Greater China: China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and Red Chip companies (issuers headquartered in Greater China but incorporated elsewhere).

Glossary and Abbreviations

Negative bias: The percentage of issuers with a negative outlook or ratings on CreditWatch negative.

Related Research

Related Rating Actions

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Emerging Markets Credit Research:Luca Rossi, Paris +33 6 2518 9258;
luca.rossi@spglobal.com
Jose M Perez-Gorozpe, Madrid +34 914233212;
jose.perez-gorozpe@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Nivedita Daiya, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in