articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250423-abs-brief-norwegian-securitization-regulation-paves-the-way-for-future-growth-101620328 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

ABS Brief: Norwegian Securitization Regulation Paves The Way For Future Growth

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

Leveraged Finance & CLOs Uncovered Podcast: Why does Athena’s recovery rating matter?

COMMENTS

Reduced Affordability Contributes To Deteriorating Prime Auto Loan ABS Performance

COMMENTS

The Rising Rate Of Non-QM And DSCR Mortgage Impairments


ABS Brief: Norwegian Securitization Regulation Paves The Way For Future Growth

This report does not constitute a rating action.

What's Happening

The EU Securitisation Regulation (SecReg) has been incorporated into the EEA Agreement, positioning Norway's securitization market for growth. The Norwegian government has approved the proposal for the SecReg implementation, with the law set to become effective shortly thereafter. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Finance has passed regulations to implement Regulations 2017/2401 and 2021/558 (amending the Capital Requirements Regulation for securitization) and the Commission Delegated Regulation 2018/1221 (amending Solvency II for securitization).

The other two EEA members, Iceland and Lichtenstein, have also adopted this regulation. However, given the relative size of the three EEA markets, we believe the most significant impact on the potential growth of the European market will come from Norway.

Norway can become a significant issuer of green auto asset-backed securities (ABS) due to its high electric vehicle (EV) adoption rates.

Why It Matters

The securitization regulation will likely bring significant changes to the financial sector in Norway. It will establish a common framework for securitizations throughout the EEA; lower capital requirements for Simple, Transparent, and Standardized (STS) securitizations; and offer exemptions from licensing requirements for special-purpose entities. The regulation will benefit financial institutions and investors, providing a more straightforward and cost-effective means of managing credit risk and accessing new investment opportunities. EU investors will also be able to treat EEA STS securitizations as EU STS transactions, potentially increasing the investor base.

SRTs likely to play a larger role in reducing risk

Growing demand for significant risk transfer securitizations (SRTs). Institutional investor demand for SRTs is strong. Recently, Oslo-based DNB Bank followed the lead of its European peers by increasing its use of SRTs. In November 2024, it launched its first SRT, linked to a portfolio of loans worth Norwegian kroner (NOK)17.6 billion ($1.6 billion) to companies, including small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs). The European Investment Fund (EIF) is providing credit risk protection on the mezzanine tranche of NOK1.1 billion then counter-guaranteed by the EIB.

Banks transfer risk to nonbanks for capital and risk management purposes. By purchasing credit protection (or selling a portion of the credit risk) on specific assets through SRTs, banks can lower the amount of capital they must hold against those assets and boost shareholder returns. Banks also use SRTs to manage risk, regardless of the impact on capital. They may use SRTs--even on low risk assets--to effectively reduce their exposures and concentrations by asset type, borrower, or other metrics--sometimes to avoid breaching related internal limits. Nordic banks across Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland are exploring its use, adding to a growing list of European banks implementing SRT transactions.

Securitizations could help support the green transition in Norway

The EIB Group and DNB Bank have provided NOK2.2 billion (€190 million) in financing for Nordic SMEs and mid-caps through Norway's first-ever green synthetic securitization, supporting the transition to greener technologies and enabling the leasing of zero-emission vehicles. Backed by the InvestEU program, the transaction provides credit protection by the EIB Group and increases access to favorable financing terms for climate-related projects, thereby unlocking capital otherwise unavailable for such investments.

The transaction will help companies significantly reduce their carbon dioxide emissions and bolster the EU’s goal to become climate neutral by 2050.

Additionally, the initiative reinforces the broader objectives of the EU Capital Markets Union by providing a replicable model for sustainable financing across the region. The development coincides with Norway’s implementation of the SecReg into its legislation.

Beyond providing vital financing, the transaction highlights the power of collaboration between public and private institutions. The EIF, as part of the EIB Group, is playing a key role in structuring the synthetic securitization, helping unlock capital for green projects while mitigating financial risks for DNB.

What Comes Next

Get ready for more Norwegian securitizations. Auto ABS transactions are likely to see a return. Before the change in law in 2015, Santander Consumer Bank was a frequent auto ABS issuer through its Bilkreditt Norwegian program. As the Norwegian EV market is one of the most developed in the world, with a penetration rate of about 90%, this could represent a new source of green auto ABS transactions. Although covered bonds will remain the main source of mortgage funding for Nordic banks, securitization growth will offer them a supplementary funding source. Nordic banks already maintain a high CET1 levels, but the current low capital weights will likely increase under Basel III regulations. Securitization provides a means to manage these capital requirements effectively. We believe the main reason for Nordic securitization will remain risk transfer and capital relief. As securitization instruments become more mainstream and the investor base further develops, we expect to see more auto and consumer ABS transactions, and the adoption of securitization legislation will likely stimulate Norwegian securitization market growth.

Related Criteria

Related Research

Primary Contact:Casper R Andersen, Frankfurt 49-69-33-999-208;
casper.andersen@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Doug Paterson, London 44-20-7176-5521;
doug.paterson@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in