articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250624-stress-test-highlights-european-banks-resilience-to-potential-trade-escalations-101628703 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Stress Test Highlights European Banks' Resilience To Potential Trade Escalations

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Could The Israel-Iran Escalation Stress Sovereigns, Banks, And Corporates?

COMMENTS

Navigating Tariffs' Credit Implications Across Asset Classes

COMMENTS

Israel-Iran Escalation Stresses Geopolitical Risk Scenarios For Regional Sovereigns And Banks

COMMENTS

Private Capital Funds: Global Regulatory Push Could Catch Problems Before They Happen


Stress Test Highlights European Banks' Resilience To Potential Trade Escalations

(Editor's Note: S&P Global Ratings believes there is a high degree of unpredictability around policy implementation by the U.S. administration and possible responses--specifically with regard to tariffs--and the potential effect on economies, supply chains, and credit conditions around the world. As a result, our baseline forecasts carry a significant amount of uncertainty, magnified by ongoing regional geopolitical conflicts. As situations evolve, we will gauge the macro and credit materiality of potential and actual policy shifts and reassess our guidance accordingly [see our research here: spglobal.com/ratings].)

This report does not constitute a rating action.

The European macroeconomic outlook is subject to elevated uncertainty. An increase in U.S. trade tariffs poses the most prominent source of downside risk.

Our stress test revealed that additional credit losses from corporate sectors that are most at risk due to their reliance on U.S. trade could reduce median pretax profits by 17%-29%, with significant variations around this median. Importantly, we found that only a handful of rated banks would be exposed to more material effects.

We believe our stress test findings support our assessment that European banks have improved their resilience to credit risks substantially. They also underpin our expectation that upcoming regulatory stress tests conducted by authorities will likely reach similar conclusions.

Despite several macro-financial shocks, European banks' asset quality has not deteriorated meaningfully in recent years. In line with our expectations, credit risks have so far only materialized in a meaningful way in Austria, Germany, and Luxembourg, and were concentrated on commercial real estate (CRE) and small and midsize enterprise (SME) portfolios.

Continuing positive developments in several countries more than offset these sporadic negative trends. Nonperforming loan (NPL) stocks continued to decline, with large EU banks' NPL ratios reaching a cyclical low of about 2% at year-end 2024.

In their base case, S&P Global Ratings' economists forecast sluggish European economic growth in 2025 and a more significant rebound in 2026. Even though banks might struggle to achieve their lending growth ambitions this year due to low credit demand, asset quality is unlikely to deteriorate materially.

This is because of still low real interest rates and accommodative fiscal policies that support borrowers' repayment capacity. What's more, we expect European consumer spending and employment rates will remain resilient. Additionally, we consider it unlikely that banks will loosen their underwriting standards.

Rising Trade Tensions Could Moderately Reduce Profits

The three scenarios in our stress test outline potential credit losses and the resulting reduction in pretax profits for a sample of 90 rated European banks (see table 4). Our analysis only covers the direct effects of trade tensions on selected corporate loan exposures and assumes no offsetting factors--meaning no change in loan exposures and no specific fiscal support programs for at-risk corporate sectors. It also does not include existing government guarantees that could cover parts of the stressed corporate portfolios.

We modelled loss rates based on EU banks' submissions in the 2023 European Banking Authority (EBA) stress test, which required banks to estimate loss rates under an adverse macro-financial scenario at a sectoral level (see appendix). We have applied lower/higher stressed loss rates to banks that are active in lower-/higher-risk countries, according to our banking industry country risk assessment (BICRA).

Based on our stress test, the median reduction in annual pretax profits is 17%-29% (see chart 1). The most pronounced reduction corresponds to scenario 3, where we envisage countertariffs and the escalation of trade tensions to key services sectors. Importantly, no bank would record annual losses in any of our three scenarios. The effect on profits would be material only for a handful of rated banks, whose pretax profits would reduce by around 60% or more (see table 2 and appendix).

Overall, the most pronounced effects on these banks result from a combination of:

  • Relatively higher exposure to corporate sectors to which we applied higher loss rates;
  • Relatively large size of the loan book compared with total assets;
  • Relatively lower expected profitability in 2025; and
  • Relatively higher economic risk (from our BICRA) in the countries where the banks operate.

Table 1

Potential loss rates in the case of rising trade tensions
Scenario Description Stressed sectors Median increase in cost of risk (%) Median reduction in 2025f pretax profit (%)
Scenario 1 U.S. tariffs on goods affect the credit quality in economic sectors most reliant on exports to the U.S. market. A Agriculture, forestry, and fishing; B mining and quarrying; C manufacturing; G wholesale and retail trade; H transport and storage 0.32 17
Scenario 2 The EU's retaliatory tariffs on goods increase asset quality pressures for economic sectors most reliant on imports from the U.S. Scenario 1 + D electricity, gas, steam, and air conditioning supply; E water supply; F construction 0.46 24
Scenario 3 Trade tensions escalate further and embroil key services sectors that are most reliant on U.S. trade. Scenario 2 + J information and communication; K financial and insurance activities; M professional, scientific, and technical activities; R arts, entertainment, and recreation 0.56 29
Sectoral classification as per the EU NACE categories. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Chart 1

image

Table 2

Only a handful of banks face more material effects from rising corporate loan losses due to trade tensions
2025f Scenario analysis--reduction in 2025f pretax profits (%)
Bank Currency Pretax profit (mil.) Credit loss provisions (mil.) Preprovision operating income (mil.) PPI / credit loss provisions (x) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
DLR Kredit A/S DKK 1,387 20 1,407 70.4 73 80 83
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. EUR 6,445 650 7,095 10.9 62 67 70
Commerzbank AG EUR 3,100 850 4,650 5.5 50 61 69
BPCE EUR 5,630 2,200 7,830 3.6 30 43 65
Groupe Credit Agricole EUR 12,169 3,500 15,669 4.5 40 48 59
DKK--Danish krone. f--Forecast. PPI—Pre-Provision Income. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Most Banks Could Also Manage A Spillover Of Trade Tensions To Retail Portfolios

In addition to the direct effects of trade tensions on corporate portfolios, we have also assessed the potential effects of a broader spillover on the quality of banks' retail portfolios.

Under this hypothetical scenario, we applied loss rates to each bank's mortgage and consumer loan portfolios derived from EU banks' submissions to the latest EBA stress test, in addition to the loss rates on corporate sectors applied under Scenario 3. In this hypothetical scenario, the median reduction in projected 2025 pretax profits would rise to 66%, indicating a material loss for most rated European banks (see chart 2).

Chart 2

image

Importantly, this hypothetical scenario also shows that European banks have strengthened their financial resilience to credit risk over time. After applying the same additional credit losses to rated banks' pretax profits from 2021--the year before interest rates and most banks' profits rose--we found the median reduction in 2021 pretax profits would have been 105%. Additionally, the already low number of banks facing significant effects has reduced meaningfully since 2021.

Asset Quality Resisted The Macro Slowdown

The inflation shock, the subsequent rise in nominal interest rates induced by central banks, and the slowdown in economic growth did not affect European banks' asset quality metrics in the past three years. At the system level, stage 2 and stage 3 ratios have been remarkably resilient in the past three years (see chart 3). This is due to a combination of cyclical and structural factors.

Chart 3

image

Cyclical factors

Negative real interest rates: Despite higher nominal interest rates, real interest rates have remained negative or low in key jurisdictions due to above-average inflation (see chart 4). Bank financing conditions therefore remained broadly favorable for most borrowers, particularly for those that managed to pass through higher prices to customers. Previous periods of material asset quality deterioration were typically associated with significantly higher real interest rates.

Chart 4

image

Still supportive fiscal environment in many jurisdictions: Several government initiatives have mitigated the effects of higher energy prices and the ensuing increase in inflation. We believe this direct support also benefited borrower repayment capacity and, with that, bank asset quality.

That said, the ensuing rise in public debt in some countries and fiscal consolidation challenges are now weighing on the outlook for some sovereign ratings, such as France and Belgium.

Structural factors

Resilient consumer spending and labor markets: European labor markets continue to experience a soft landing, with a gradual slowdown in job openings but no meaningful rise in unemployment yet. At the same time, consumer spending picked up in 2024 and rising real incomes point to a continuation of this trend.

Lower appetite for credit risk and better credit risk management practices: In several European countries, loan growth has been flat or negative in recent years. For the riskiest sectors, such as CRE, loan growth was also very limited and focused on senior secured positions with known customers. Overall, we believe European banks have strengthened their underwriting standards. The introduction of international financial reporting standard (IFRS) 9 and stricter guidance from supervisors has also helped raise the quality of credit risk management.

Asset Quality Deterioration Is Focused On Specific Portfolios

At a more granular level, the only negative outliers are some banks in Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg, as well as CRE and SME portfolios. That said, asset quality deterioration was limited in recent years (see charts 5 and 6).

Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg were most affected by the economic slowdown from the war in Ukraine, energy price shocks, and the price correction in the real estate market. As for CRE and SME portfolios, these are typically very vulnerable during economic slowdowns. As such, the current trends are in line with our expectations at the beginning of the economic slowdown and reflect mainly cyclical factors. In our portfolio of rated European banks, we currently assign negative outlooks directly related to asset quality deterioration to the ratings on Banque Internationale à Luxembourg and Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Overall asset quality metrics in Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg remain close to EU averages, indicating a normalization rather than a deviation from regional trends. We note a higher degree of divergence in the distribution of stage 2 ratios. That said, we believe the ratios are not fully comparable across banks, despite supervisory efforts to align practices.

Chart 7

image

Our Base Case Foresees A Stabilization Of Asset Quality

Our economists revised down their macro forecasts following the rise in global trade tensions in early April 2025. For the eurozone, they now expect lower but still positive annual GDP growth, with steady unemployment rates that will support the resilience of the labor market. In 2026, economic growth should accelerate, primarily on the back of higher defense spending in core eurozone countries.

This means the main cyclical factors supporting asset quality will remain in play over 2025-2026. Concretely, real interest rates will remain low and fiscal policies will continue to be favorable, albeit at varying degrees: Fiscal spending will be relatively higher in Germany but lower in France and Belgium, which are undergoing excessive deficit procedures.

Against this broader macroeconomic context and provided European banks will not relax their credit underwriting standards any time soon, our base case assumes asset quality metrics will remain stable and hover around their current cyclical lows (see charts 8 and 9).

Chart 8

image

Chart 9

image

Importantly, most European banks' profitability has increased significantly in recent years, largely due to more favorable nominal interest rates. This means banks have now more capacity to absorb higher credit losses from current earnings, without having to deplete capital (see chart 10).

For the 170 European banks we rate, we expect credit costs will represent a median of only 11% of pre-provision income. Accordingly, banks could absorb a significant increase in credit costs before their earnings turn negative.

Chart 10

image

Appendix

Overview of our stress test exercise

Loss rates. Our stress test estimates the sensitivity of banks' profits, based on forecast 2025 pretax profits, to higher credit losses resulting from asset quality deterioration in specific corporate sectors.

These loss rates were modelled by banks for each sector under the adverse macro-financial scenario laid out by the EBA (see table 3). The lower bound corresponds to the 25th percentile and the upper bound to the 75th percentile in the distribution of annual loss rates modelled by EU banks participating in the 2023 EBA stress test.

We have annualized the loss rates because the EBA results reflected three-year cumulative loss rates. The EBA adverse scenario assumed a cumulative GDP decline in the eurozone of 5.9% over three years, with unemployment reaching 12.4% at the end of the third year.

The loss rates that we applied in our stress test for a given bank and portfolio vary, depending on the weighted average economic risk (WAER) of the bank's credit exposures. For banks with a WAER of 1, the applied loss rate was set at the lower bound, and increased linearly toward the upper bound for banks with higher WAERs.

Balance sheet assumption. We applied the loss rates to banks' portfolios as of end 2024. We did not assume any change in the composition of the loan book nor any other risk mitigating factor, for example fiscal measures to support specific sectors. We did not include the impact of government guarantees which could cover specific parts of stressed portfolios. We did not adjust loss rates for the initial level of the baseline risk cost forecast for 2025 or the existence of provision overlays for specific banks.

Table 3

Modelled additional loss rates per portfolio and sector, derived from the 2023 EBA stress test results
Portfolio Lower bound Upper bound
Household 1.00 2.33
Of which mortgage loans 0.67 2.00
Of which consumer loans 1.33 3.33
A Agriculture, forestry and fishing 2.00 4.00
B Mining and quarrying 1.00 3.0
C Manufacturing 1.67 3.33
D Electricity, gas, steam, and air conditioning supply 1.00 2.00
E Water supply 0.67 2.33
F Construction 2.00 4.33
G Wholesale and retail trade 1.33 3.33
H Transport and storage 1.33 3.00
J Information and communication 1.00 2.33
K Financial and insurance activities 0.67 2.00
M Professional, scientific, and technical activities 1.67 3.33
R Arts, entertainment, and recreation 1.33 3.67
Sectoral classification as per the EU NACE categories. CRE--Commercial real estate. EBA--European Banking Authority. SME--Small and midsize enterprises. Sources: European Banking Authority, S&P Global Ratings.

Overview of stress test results

Scenario 1 

Chart 11

image

Chart 12

image

Scenario 2 

Chart 13

image

Chart 14

image

Scenario 3 

Chart 15

image

Chart 16

image

Detailed stress test results

Table 4

Detailed stress test results
Bank Currency 2025f Scenario analysis--reduction in 2025f pretax profits (%)
Pretax profit (mil.) Credit loss provisions (mil.) Preprovision operating income (mil.) PPI / credit loss provisions (x) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Abanca Corporacion Bancaria S.A EUR 804 120 938 7.8 31 42 52
ABN AMRO Bank N.V. EUR 2,800 300 3,100 10.3 2 24 38
AIB Group (U.K.) PLC GBP 178 20 208 10.4 9 14 17
AIB Group PLC EUR 1,947 185 2,232 12.1 8 14 16
Aktia Bank PLC EUR 108 8 116 14.5 5 9 25
Banca Mediolanum EUR 1,125 50 1,250 25 0 1 1
Banca Popolare di Sondrio SpA EUR 767 200 867 4.3 34 44 52
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. EUR 14,672 6,000 21,197 3.5 23 28 31
Banco BPI S.A. EUR 691 60 766 12.8 16 20 22
Banco BPM EUR 2,561 600 3,161 5.3 35 43 49
Banco Comercial Portugues S.A. EUR 1,428 320 2,188 6.8 16 20 23
Banco de Sabadell S.A. EUR 2,303 800 3,253 4.1 28 37 46
Banco Santander S.A. EUR 18,413 12,500 34,383 2.8 23 28 32
Banco Santander Totta S.A. EUR 1,254 90 1,344 14.9 13 16 18
Bank of Cyprus Public Co. Ltd. EUR 471 85 576 6.8 12 16 19
Bank of Ireland Group PLC EUR 1,630 210 1,940 9.2 14 15 17
Bank of Valletta PLC EUR 233 10 243 24.3 10 15 20
Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A. PLN 8,228 900 9,528 10.6 14 17 19
Bankinter S.A. EUR 1,354 310 1,767 5.7 26 36 45
Banque Internationale a Luxembourg EUR 168 40 208 5.2 12 35 43
Barclays PLC GBP 8,817 2,100 11,387 5.4 7 9 11
Basler Kantonalbank CHF 191 8 265 33.1 10 13 16
Belfius Bank SA/NV EUR 1,401 70 1,471 21 19 35 50
BKS Bank AG EUR 173 30 203 6.8 19 33 41
BNP Paribas EUR 17,486 3,600 21,086 5.9 29 36 43
BPCE EUR 5,630 2,200 7,830 3.6 30 43 65
Caisse Centrale du Credit Mutuel EUR 6,636 2,200 8,762 4 25 33 47
Caixa Geral de Depositos S.A. EUR 2,047 150 2,272 15.1 9 13 14
CaixaBank, S.A. EUR 7,640 1,100 9,280 8.4 21 29 36
Ceska Sporitelna, a.s. CZK 29,959 700 30,659 43.8 8 10 10
Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka A.S. CZK 18,306 500 18,806 37.6 23 31 32
Commerzbank AG EUR 3,100 850 4,650 5.5 50 61 69
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. EUR 6,445 650 7,095 10.9 62 67 70
Crelan S.A. EUR 242 30 278 9.3 17 25 33
Danske Bank A/S DKK 28,657 1,000 29,718 29.7 16 20 25
De Volksbank N.V. EUR 390 25 415 16.6 0 3 6
Deutsche Bank AG EUR 9,436 1,500 11,236 7.5 16 18 28
Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG EUR 103 115 218 1.9 2 11 14
DLR Kredit A/S DKK 1,387 20 1,407 70.4 73 80 83
DNB Bank ASA NOK 55,839 1,800 57,639 32 10 16 20
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank Frankfurt am Main EUR 2,578 525 3,103 5.9 18 26 29
Erste Group Bank AG EUR 5,391 550 6,091 11.1 23 33 36
Eurobank S.A EUR 1,772 330 2,152 6.5 32 39 42
FinecoBank S.p.A. EUR 828 3 871 290.5 0 0 0
Gorenjska Banka d.d. EUR 43 6 49 8.2 34 45 50
Graubuendner Kantonalbank CHF 227 1 228 228.3 12 18 29
Groupe Credit Agricole EUR 12,169 3,500 15,669 4.5 40 48 59
HSBC Holdings PLC USD 27,846 4,250 34,846 8.2 20 25 29
Ibercaja Banco S.A. EUR 453 92 570 6.2 25 34 39
Iccrea Banca SpA EUR 1,934 550 2,484 4.5 32 42 45
ING Groep N.V. EUR 8,254 1,300 9,780 7.5 34 42 48
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA EUR 13,454 1,600 15,404 9.6 19 24 30
Islandsbanki hf ISK 30,569 2,000 32,569 16.3 1 30 32
Jyske Bank A/S DKK 5,664 220 5,884 26.7 16 23 26
KBC Group N.V. EUR 3,973 270 4,413 16.3 23 30 37
Klarna Bank AB SEK 511 6,800 7,311 1.1 8 8 8
Knab N.V. EUR 97 6 103 17.2 2 3 3
Komercni Banka A.S. CZK 16,582 2,000 18,582 9.3 27 33 36
Landsbankinn hf. ISK 46,151 4,500 50,651 11.3 20 31 34
Lansforsakringar Bank SEK 2,210 180 2,780 15.4 7 12 13
LGT Bank AG CHF 309 3 358 119.3 0 2 4
Lloyds Banking Group PLC GBP 6,574 1,100 8,174 7.4 8 11 14
mBank S.A. PLN 3,005 800 6,805 8.5 23 31 36
Mediobanca SpA EUR 1,753 260 2,043 7.9 9 12 20
National Bank of Greece S.A. EUR 1,527 200 1,737 8.7 28 35 37
Nationwide Building Society GBP 1,762 380 2,642 7 0 1 1
NatWest Group PLC GBP 6,899 700 7,749 11.1 13 19 23
NIBC Bank N.V. EUR 218 20 238 11.9 10 16 24
Nordea Bank Abp EUR 5,984 200 6,184 30.9 13 17 23
Nova Ljubljanska Banka D.D. EUR 570 50 623 12.5 24 32 35
Nykredit Realkredit A/S DKK 15,518 250 15,768 63.1 11 14 16
Oma Savings Bank PLC EUR 92 35 127 3.6 8 12 16
OTP Bank PLC HUF 1,586,486 100,000 1,686,486 16.9 12 16 17
Piraeus Bank S.A. EUR 1,400 310 1,710 5.5 32 43 48
Raiffeisen Bank International AG EUR 2,102 500 2,902 5.8 27 31 39
RCI Banque EUR 1,360 205 1,565 7.6 35 40 42
Santander Consumer Bank AG EUR 363 230 593 2.6 29 31 34
Santander UK Group Holdings PLC GBP 1,609 250 2,324 9.3 2 3 12
SBAB Bank AB (publ) SEK 2,754 50 3,383 67.7 1 2 2
S-Bank PLC EUR 141 26 167 6.4 0 0 0
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) SEK 43,595 1,400 44,995 32.1 14 18 26
Societe Generale EUR 7,307 1,600 9,207 5.8 27 33 41
Svenska Handelsbanken AB SEK 29,605 400 32,205 80.5 4 8 12
Swedbank AB SEK 36,995 1,250 40,445 32.4 6 8 10
UniCredit Bank Austria AG EUR 1,261 80 1,434 17.9 20 30 41
UniCredit Bank GmbH EUR 2,305 300 2,605 8.7 30 37 43
UniCredit SpA EUR 12,437 1,300 14,737 11.3 25 31 37
Van Lanschot Kempen N.V. EUR 206 10 216 21.6 1 1 4
Virgin Money UK PLC GBP 486 225 791 3.5 18 21 25
Volkswagen Bank GmbH EUR 807 130 937 7.2 44 49 54
CHF--Swiss franc. CZK--Czech koruna. DKK--Danish krone. f--Forecast. ISK--Icelandic króna. NOK--Norwegian krone. PLN--Polish zloty. PPI—Pre-Provision Income. SEK--Swedish krona. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Primary Contacts:Nicolas Charnay, Paris 33623748591;
nicolas.charnay@spglobal.com
Giles Edwards, London 44-20-7176-7014;
giles.edwards@spglobal.com
Osman Sattar, FCA, London 44-20-7176-7198;
osman.sattar@spglobal.com
Karim Kroll, Frankfurt 49-69-33999-169;
karim.kroll@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Elena Iparraguirre, Madrid 34-91-389-6963;
elena.iparraguirre@spglobal.com
Mirko Sanna, Milan 390272111275;
mirko.sanna@spglobal.com
Benjamin Heinrich, CFA, FRM, Frankfurt 49-69-33999-167;
benjamin.heinrich@spglobal.com
Nicolas Malaterre, Paris 33-14-420-7324;
nicolas.malaterre@spglobal.com
Richard Barnes, London 44-20-7176-7227;
richard.barnes@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in