articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/190913-a-look-at-our-ratings-on-the-top-12-global-multiline-insurers-after-application-of-our-new-criteria-11130865 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

A Look At Our Ratings On The Top 12 Global Multiline Insurers After Application Of Our New Criteria

European Insurance Outlook 2025 Video

COMMENTS

Highlights From The European Insurance Conference 2024

COMMENTS

Cyber Insurance Market Outlook 2025: Cycle Management Will Be Key To Sustaining Profits

NEWS

Report Says A Prolonged Financial Market Downturn Would Erode Insurers' Surplus Capital Across EMEA


A Look At Our Ratings On The Top 12 Global Multiline Insurers After Application Of Our New Criteria

S&P Global Ratings' review of the 12 global multiline insurers that we rate under our recently revised criteria has yielded several credit insights, though did not lead to changes to ratings or outlooks. (We did upgrade U.K.-based Aviva, but for reasons related to underlying credit improvements at the company and our future expectations for the business.) All in all, we see less pressure on the ratings on the global multiline insurers (GMI) given their robust risk management. In response to the long period of low interest rates, GMIs have pursued transactions to reduce earnings and balance sheet volatility, altered their portfolios to emphasize stable products, and focused on underwriting profitability. Size is important but not the be all and end all. GMIs are unapologetically reshuffling their business mix and exiting geographic markets where they may not meet their return on capital targets. However, it might be premature to say we see a positive trend. Indeed, weaker global economic conditions are on the horizon, interest rates remain historically low, and political tensions are on the rise.

The reason why we revised the criteria was to improve the clarity and transparency of the key rating drivers, remove mechanistic caps, and further global alignment--with increased scope for peer analysis to differentiate creditworthiness among insurers. It was not meant to radically change how we assess creditworthiness. The operating units of the top 12 GMI we rate continue to have high ratings--ranging from 'AA' (17% or 2), 'AA-' (58% or 7) or 'A+' (25% or 3). The vast majority of the outlooks on the insurers remained stable following application of our criteria, with one outlook remaining negative (Aegon) and another outlook staying positive (Tokio Marine).

The GMIs comprise the most diverse insurance businesses globally, showing the strongest diversification by product and region. This is well reflected in competitive position scores that range from "very strong" to "excellent" (see tables 1-3 below for these scores and other ratings components on the top 12 GMI). Yet, breadth of products on a global scale itself is not enough of a differentiator. We believe consistent and strong earnings are paramount to maintaining competitive strength. Peer analysis is an important component of our ratings including in situations where we find relative degrees of strengths or weaknesses in the business and financial profiles of insurers (see the notes to tables 1-3). Chubb is the only GMI whose anchor is a singular outcome and doesn't straddle categories, though it is worthwhile mentioning that the insurer outperforms its peer group with respect to operating earnings and capital strength.

Our view of the financial risk profiles of GMIs ranges mostly from "strong" to "very strong," with Chubb at "excellent," supported by capital redundancy at the 'AAA' confidence level. Capital adequacy for the GMIs reflects on average relatively superior capitalization and more diversified earnings streams than their less diversified competitors. We also generally believe the GMIs have strong capabilities to manage risk exposures. As part of our analysis of their financial risk profiles, we assess GMIs' risk exposures to be "moderately low," except AIG's "moderately high" assessment stemming from exposure to volatility from adverse reserve development, particularly in its U.S. long-tail lines of business, that is somewhat offset by strategically higher use of reinsurance.

Most Of The Outlooks Are Stable

We see a balanced distribution of outlooks for the 12-largest GMIs: Most of them are stable, with one negative (Aegon) and one positive (Tokio Marine).

GMIs have reinvented themselves over the last few years to overcome higher capital requirements, market volatility, and competitive conditions, supporting the stable outlooks for the majority of this portfolio. We have seen significant balance sheet restructuring activities, shifts in product focus, the strategic use of reinsurance, and underwriting remediation efforts. Below are a few examples.

AXA's acquisition of XL Insurance and its ongoing sale of U.S. subsidiary AXA Equitable Holdings are helping the group shift its exposure to insurance underwriting risk from financial risk, in line with its strategy. Replacing U.S. life and asset management with XL also downsized AXA's total balance sheet by over €100 billion, which resulted in lower capital requirements.

MetLife's spin-off of Brighthouse Financial, its U.S. retail business, has improved its quality of earnings with lower reported net derivative gains or losses. Nevertheless, not all of Metlife's legacy risk went out the door with Brighthouse. It still has exposure to long-dated, complex liabilities like long-term care, variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders, and universal life with secondary guarantees. MET continues to hold a leading position in the U.S. group life insurance market and has a strong international footprint, especially in Japan and Latin America.

Prudential PLC announced a group restructuring in 2018, aiming to split its U.K. operations and European operations from the remainder of the international operations, consisting primarily of Jackson National Life Insurance in the U.S. and Prudential Corporation Asia. We believe this move is not linked to Brexit, but mainly reflecting different life insurance trends in the U.K. than in the U.S. and Asia. A risk of a disruptive no-deal Brexit could potentially impact asset prices in the U.K.

AIG has reinvented itself as a newly rational property/casualty insurer and has aggressively been pushing for rate increases under its redefined underwriting appetite, particularly within its Lexington platform in the U.S. excess & surplus casualty market. It also has placed greater emphasis on reinsurance to contain volatility, notably through its landmark deal for Berkshire to provide adverse development cover. Plus, AIG has undertaken some reconstruction of its balance sheet through the creation of Fortitude Re for its life legacy business, in which it maintains a controlling stake. We view this transaction as credit neutral because we assess capital on an enterprise level.

We recently raised the ratings on Aviva to 'AA-' from 'A+', following improved balance sheet resilience and capital allocation discipline. We observed improved capital buffers alongside better prospective operating profitability, despite the inherent risks of a disruptive Brexit. We note that Aviva has been reducing leverage and has publically committed to further reductions in this regard, which we view positively.

Ratings Components For Global Multiline Insurers

Table 1

Ratings Components For Life And P/C Insurers With Broad Geographic Reach

AIG

Allianz SE

Aviva PLC

AXA

Zurich Insurance Co. Ltd.

Business risk profile Very Strong Very strong Very strong Very Strong Very strong
Competitive position Very strong Excellent Very strong Excellent Excellent
IICRA Intermediate risk Intermediate risk Low risk Intermediate risk Intermediate risk
Financial risk profile Strong Very strong Strong Strong Very strong
Capital and earnings Very Strong Very strong Strong Strong Very strong
Risk exposure Moderately high Moderately low Moderately low Moderately low Moderately low
Funding structure Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral
Anchor a+ aa aa- aa- aa-
Modifiers 0 0 0 0 0
Governance Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral
Liquidity Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional
Comparable ratings analysis 0 0 0 0 0
Sovereign risk 0 0 0 0 0
Financial strength rating A+ AA AA- AA- AA-
Outlook Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable
Notes about the anchor, when applicable, where there is a dual outcome. This is influenced by our view that AIG's operating performance lags its GMI peers. This is influenced by our view of Allianz' diversified income streams and supported by its asset-management business, including PIMCO, compared to its 'AA-' rated peers. This is influenced by our view of Aviva PLC's capital levels and volatility compared with most of its 'AA-' or 'A+' rated peers. This is influenced by our view of AXA's leading position in many insurance market, exceptional diversification and superior brand recognition This is influenced by our view of Zurich's operating performance in line with the GMI peer group average.

Table 2

Ratings Components For P/C Biased Insurers With Broad Geographic Reach
Chubb QBE Tokio Marine Group
Business risk profile Very Strong Very Strong Very strong
Competitive position Excellent Very strong Excellent
IICRA Intermediate risk Intermediate risk Intermediate risk
Financial risk profile Excellent Strong Strong
Capital and earnings Excellent Strong Strong
Risk exposure Moderately low Moderately low Moderately low
Funding structure Neutral Neutral Neutral
Anchor aa a+ aa-
Modifiers 0 0 0
Governance Neutral Neutral Neutral
Liquidity Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional
Comparable ratings analysis 0 0 0
Sovereign risk 0 0 (1)
Financial strength rating AA A+ A+
Outlook Stable Stable Positive
Notes about the anchor, when applicable, where there is a dual outcome. This is influenced by our view of QBE's historical earning volatility. Reflects our view that Tokio Marine Group's very high competitive position and its solid financial base, which is supported by diversified revenue sources and strong risk controls, are comparable with those of 'AA-' rated peers.

Table 3

Ratings Components For Life And Savings Biased Insurers With Broad Geographic Reach
Aegon MetLife Prudential Financial Prudential PLC
Business risk profile Very Strong Very Strong Very strong Excellent
Competitive position Very Strong Very Strong Very strong Excellent
IICRA Low Risk Low Risk Low Low risk
Financial risk profile Strong Very Strong Very Strong Very strong
Capital and earnings Strong Very Strong Very Strong Very strong
Risk exposure Moderately Low Moderately low Moderately low Moderately low
Funding structure Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral
Anchor aa- aa- aa- aa
Modifiers 0 0 0 0
Governance Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral
Liquidity Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional Exceptional
Comparable ratings analysis 0 0 0 (-1)
Sovereign risk 0 0 0 0
Financial strength rating AA- AA- AA- AA-
Outlook Negative Stable Stable Stable
Notes about the anchor, when applicable, where there is a dual outcome. The higher anchor reflects the very high S&P Global Ratings capital adequacy. Influenced by MET's competitive strength and capital redundancy, which is line with similar rated peers. Our aa- anchor selection captures PRU's stand-alone credit strengths that are in line with similar rated peers. This is influenced by our view of Prudential PLC's capital levels and underwriting margins compared with most of its 'aa' rated peers.

The ratings information in tables 1-3 relates to the core operating entities of each group when the parent entity is a holding company. This presentation makes the comparisons among insurance groups more consistent because our credit analysis focuses on the consolidated group. Depending on the jurisdiction, we typically rate insurance holding companies two to three notches lower than the group credit profile (GCP), taking into account the degree of structural subordination within insurance groups.

The tables show the anchors, governance, liquidity, and comparative rating analysis (CRA) modifiers and sovereign risk, if any, for each group. Of the 12 GMIs, we assign a CRA only to Prudential PLC (one notch down) to reflect prospectively weaker diversification following the proposed changes to its group structure, as Prudential PLC will no longer write insurance in Europe, as well as some, albeit reducing, execution risk of the transaction. We apply a sovereign risk cap to Tokio Marine, limiting its rating to 'A+' with a positive outlook currently. The cap is reflecting Tokio Marine's exposure with majority in its domestic insurance market as well domestic invested assets despite the group's progress in diversification.

Related Criteria And Research

  • Insurance Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
  • Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Tracy Dolin, New York (1) 212-438-1325;
tracy.dolin@spglobal.com
Volker Kudszus, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-192;
volker.kudszus@spglobal.com
Secondary Credit Analysts:David J Masters, London (44) 20-7176-7047;
david.masters@spglobal.com
Heena C Abhyankar, New York + 1 (212) 438 1106;
heena.abhyankar@spglobal.com
Toshiko Sekine, Tokyo (81) 3-4550-8720;
toshiko.sekine@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in