This report does not constitute a rating action.
| Index name | 7-day net yield (%) | 30-day net yield (%) | WAM-R (days) | WAM-F (days) | Total net assets (bil. $) | A-1+' : 'A-1' credit quality (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 4.70 | 4.56 | 17 | 66 | 86.6 | 99:1 | ||||||||
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 4.84 | 4.73 | 30 | 69 | 235.5 | 66:34 | ||||||||
| LGIP--Local government investment pool. WAM-R--Weighted average maturity to reset. WAM-F--Weighted average maturity to final. | ||||||||||||||
'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools
The 'AAAm' local government investment pool (LGIP) trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk, as defined in S&P Global Ratings' principal stability fund ratings (PSFR) criteria. The LGIPs featured in this report all conform to our PSFR criteria, as shown in the affirmation of our 'AAAm' ratings during 2022. In our rating analysis, we place emphasis on the net asset value (NAV) per share, 'A-1+' credit quality, weighted average maturity to reset (WAM-R), weighted average maturity to final (WAM-F), net asset trends, and the underlying composition of LGIPs.
LGIPs are present in many U.S. states where, generally, the state treasurer oversees a pooled investment vehicle that operates in a similar way to a money market fund. Typically a cost-effective investment option, LGIPs allow municipalities and public entities to combine their idle cash and operating balances to obtain economies of scale, through a diversified range of investments, to earn an incremental rate of return. Unlike money market funds registered with the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), LGIPs are not regulated by the SEC and therefore not subject to SEC rule 2a-7. However, LGIPs typically benefit from the purview of state statutes, which provide guidelines on LGIPs' investment policy and objective, as well as from the standards and guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, where standard 79 allows the use of amortized cost to value an LGIP's portfolio assets.
Our LGIP metrics demonstrate the investment practices of 'AAAm' rated LGIPs and those conforming to our PSFR criteria. If an individual LGIP's metrics are below our benchmarks, this may indicate a more conservative approach to investment, while metrics well above our benchmarks may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit still within the range for a 'AAAm' PSFR.
Market Comment
U.S LGIPs' asset levels reached historical highs in the first quarter of 2023, accentuating the benefits of this investment product. LGIPs with assets collectively exceeding $320 billion follow a prime or government strategy and are rated under our PSFR criteria. Asset flows generally follow cyclical patterns related to funding activities and tax receipts. Over the first quarter of 2023, rated LGIPs following a government strategy (government LGIPs) saw assets increase by 17.8%, while asset growth for rated prime LGIPs was 12.4%. Generally speaking, strong asset growth can be attributed to improving tax receipts and competitive returns over money market funds and bank deposits. In addition, LGIPs absorbed monies from participants receiving federal stimulus funds, a factor that has contributed to recent years' asset growth.
Chart 1
LGIP returns continued to rise in Q1 2023, making the funds more compelling in a rising interest rate environment. Following several interest rate hikes by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed) during 2022, LGIP seven-day yields broke through the 4% barrier for the first time since the global financial crisis (see table 1). Following the 25 basis-point hike in March, government and prime LGIP seven-day yields continued to rise through the first quarter of 2023, inching closer to 5%. LGIPs now provide a rate of return that can compete with interest on bank deposits.
Table 1
| 'AAAm' LGIP Seven-Day Net Yield (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | Mar-22 | Jun-22 | Sep-22 | Dec-22 | Mar-23 |
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 0.21 | 1.24 | 2.77 | 4.15 | 4.70 |
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 0.33 | 1.38 | 2.81 | 4.38 | 4.84 |
Managers continued to mitigate price volatility with conservative management, providing a consistent NAV per share. The NAV per share averaged 0.99972 in the first quarter of 2023, about 22 basis points higher than our lowest NAV threshold of 0.9975 for 'AAAm' PSFRs (see chart 2). We previously observed a decline in LGIP NAVs following the 75-basis-point hike in June, but they remain within the 'AAAm' threshold. Notably though, managers have followed a prudent investment focus, navigating the rapid interest rate moves with measures to reduce portfolio hazards and improve liquidity.
Chart 2
The Fed's interest rate policy steps remain at the forefront when it comes to formulating investment strategy. Recently, volatility in the banking sector and uncertainty regarding the debt ceiling have seen a continuation of high credit quality positioning and a moderate increase in weekly maturing assets. This was especially the case for government-focused LGIPs, which (on average) had 70% of their assets maturing weekly in March 2023, the highest recorded in the last two years. Prime LGIPs have been consistent, with 45% weekly liquidity, an improvement since the rate hikes.
Chart 3
Weighted average maturities, key indicators to interest rate risk, remained conservative in the first quarter of 2023. The marked decline in 2022 (see table 2 and chart 4) can be attributed to fluctuations in global market conditions caused by geopolitical uncertainty, with the resulting dramatic rise in inflation prompting aggressive actions from the Fed. A further extension of weighted average maturities (WAMs) is likely following the expected rate hike. However, WAMs are unlikely to extend to pre-rate-hike levels due to economic uncertainty.
Table 2
| 'AAAm' LGIP Weighted Average Maturity (In Days) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | Mar-22 | Jun-22 | Sep-22 | Dec-22 | Mar-23 |
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 31 | 24 | 21 | 13 | 17 |
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 36 | 29 | 24 | 26 | 30 |
Chart 4
Chart 5
In looking at 2023 and recognizing the nature of the underlying instruments in LGIP portfolios--generally high credit quality ('A-1' or higher; see table 3 and chart 6) government, agency, and bank investments--we cite some of the key takeaways from recent reports: "Singing The (Banking) Blues: Navigating The Current Volatility In The Banking Industry," March 27, 2023, on spglobal.com, and "Economic Outlook U.S. Q2 2023: Still Resilient, Downside Risks Rise," March 27, 2023, published on RatingsDirect.
- S&P Global's economists now expect full-year U.S. GDP growth at 0.7%, in contrast to the November 2022 forecast of a contraction of 0.1% in 2023.
- The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in the first quarter, following a flight of deposits, led to a reassessment of market liquidity and attempts to manage contagion risks across the banking industry.
- Inflation likely peaked in the third quarter of 2022 and is expected to remain higher than historical levels on continued supply-chain disruptions in certain sectors.
- The federal funds rate is expected to peak at 5.00%-5.15% by May, but as prices begin to stabilize, the first interest rate cut could occur by mid-2024.
Table 3
| 'AAAm' LGIP 'A-1+' Credit Quality (%) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | Mar-22 | Jun-22 | Sep-22 | Dec-22 | Mar-23 | |||||||
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 99 | 98 | 98 | 99 | 99 | |||||||
| S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 66 | 68 | 72 | 67 | 66 | |||||||
| LGIP--Local government investment pool. | ||||||||||||
Chart 6
Chart 7
Chart 8
Table 4
| 'AAAm' LGIPs--Top 10 By Assets | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government LGIPs | ||||||||||||||
| Principal stability fund rating | Local government investment pool | Net assets (mil. $) | --Portfolio maturity (days)-- | 'A-1+' credit quality (%) | NAV per share | |||||||||
| WAM-R | WAM-F | |||||||||||||
| AAAm | TEXPOOL | 33,186 | 17 | 73 | 99 | 0.99990 | ||||||||
| AAAm | North Carolina Capital Management Trust - Government Portfolio | 17,843 | 8 | 68 | 100 | 1.00018 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Texas Short Term Asset Reserve (TexSTAR) Cash Reserve Fund | 11,099 | 12 | 40 | 100 | 1.00005 | ||||||||
| AAAm | New York Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (NY CLASS) | 9,034 | 41 | 78 | 100 | 1.00010 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Lone Star Investment Pool - Government Overnight Fund | 6,724 | 15 | 66 | 99 | 1.00021 | ||||||||
| AAAm | New York Liquid Asset Fund - MAX Portfolio | 1,904 | 10 | 10 | 100 | 1.00004 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS Government) | 1,363 | 20 | 82 | 100 | 1.00001 | ||||||||
| AAAm | New Jersey Asset & Rebate Management Program/Joint Account | 1,242 | 27 | 91 | 100 | 1.00006 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PRIME) | 739 | 18 | 76 | 100 | 1.00000 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Nebraska Liquid Asset Fund | 625 | 26 | 91 | 97 | 1.00005 | ||||||||
| Prime LGIPs | ||||||||||||||
| Principal stability fund rating | Local government investment pool | Net assets (mil. $) | --Portfolio maturity (days)-- | 'A-1+' credit quality (%) | NAV per share | |||||||||
| WAM-R | WAM-F | |||||||||||||
| AAAm | Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS) | 22,905 | 35 | 67 | 62 | 0.99988 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Florida PRIME | 22,436 | 23 | 79 | 61 | 0.99984 | ||||||||
| AAAm | State Treasury Asset Reserve of Ohio (STAR OHIO) | 21,841 | 37 | 66 | 62 | 0.99983 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Connecticut State Treasurer's Short-Term Investment Fund | 19,201 | 38 | 88 | 81 | 1.00073 | ||||||||
| AAAm | California Asset Management Trust/Cash Reserve Portfolio | 12,892 | 27 | 58 | 54 | 0.99982 | ||||||||
| AAAm | TEXPOOL Prime | 12,482 | 24 | 66 | 59 | 0.99982 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PLUS+) | 11,951 | 32 | 70 | 62 | 0.99992 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Local Government Investment Cooperative | 10,568 | 33 | 59 | 69 | 0.99991 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Virginia Local Government Investment Pool | 10,287 | 49 | 97 | 73 | 0.99983 | ||||||||
| AAAm | Maryland Local Government Investment Pool | 9,775 | 30 | 91 | 93 | 1.00015 | ||||||||
| Source: S&P Global Ratings. | ||||||||||||||
Related Research
- Credit Conditions North America Q2 2023: Coalescing Stresses, March 28, 2023
- Economic Outlook U.S. Q2 2023: Still Resilient, Downside Risks Rise, March 27, 2023
- Signing The (Banking) Blues: Navigating The Current Volatility In The Banking Industry, March 27, 2023
- Rapidly Rising Rates Are Putting Some Money Market Funds At Risk, July 22, 2022
| Primary Credit Analyst: | Kara Wachsmann, Englewood + 303 721 4547; kara.wachsmann@spglobal.com |
| Secondary Contacts: | Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642; michael.masih@spglobal.com |
| Andrew Paranthoiene, London + 44 20 7176 8416; andrew.paranthoiene@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.