articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240201-aaam-local-government-investment-pool-trends-fourth-quarter-2023-12975192.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (Fourth-Quarter 2023)

COMMENTS

EMEA Financial Institutions Monitor 1Q2025: Managing Falling Interest Rates Will Be Key To Solid Profitability

Global Banks Outlook 2025 Interactive Dashboard Tutorial

COMMENTS

Banking Brief: Complicated Shareholder Structures Will Weigh On Italian Bank Consolidation

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Global Banking Outlook 2025: The Case For Cautious Confidence


'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (Fourth-Quarter 2023)

image

The 'AAAm' local government investment pool (LGIP) trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk. The LGIPs featured in this report all conform to our principal stability fund ratings (PSFR) criteria.

In our rating analysis, we emphasize the net asset value (NAV) per share, 'A-1+' credit quality, weighted average maturity to reset (WAM-R), weighted average maturity to final (WAM-F), net asset trends, and the underlying composition of LGIPs. For more, see the "'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools" section at the end of this report.

U.S. LGIPs' Assets Higher From Seasonal Flows

Both government and prime LGIPs' assets under management increased during the fourth quarter, which is typical for the season. Seasonal inflows at year-end are common among LGIPs because the participants receive tax revenues at the beginning of the quarter. Through the end of the quarter, government funds increased $7.8 billion, totaling $88.7 billion, and prime funds increased by $13.9 billion to $256.8 billion. We also note that like prime money market funds, prime LGIPs can invest in corporate credit securities.

Chart 1

image

LGIPs Continue To Offer A Competitive Rate Of Return

LGIP yields have increased in conjunction with the U.S. Federal Reserve's hikes during 2023 and remained relatively stable through the year-end policy rate pause (see table 1). LGIPs are likely to remain competitive with institutional money market funds and bank deposits if the economic outlook and corresponding policy rate level continues to remain uncertain through the first half of 2024.

Table 1

'AAAm' LGIP seven-day net yield (%)
Index Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs 4.15 4.70 5.04 5.30 5.32
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs 4.38 4.84 5.22 5.48 5.49

NAV Stability Trends Higher Again

The average net asset value (NAV) per share increased above 1.00 to 1.00018 at the end of the fourth quarter, which is well above our minimum threshold of 0.9975 for 'AAAm' rated PSFRs (see chart 2). This is a trending improvement on the heels of the prior year's policy rate hikes and the current plateau that began in July. Additionally, credit quality has remained stable, and rated LGIP managers continued to focus on conservative investments, maintaining liquidity and high-quality investments. Apart from factors like credit quality, LGIP managers position portfolios for the level of rates.

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Weighted Average Maturities Keep Rising

Managers continued to expect a plateauing of the policy rate hiking cycle through the end of the quarter. Accordingly, increases in weighted average maturities (WAM) have continued to trend higher from much lower levels during the trailing four quarters, with WAMs finishing the fourth quarter at 36 days and 46 days for government and prime funds, respectively. Much of the maturity extension in government funds can be attributed to reallocation from repurchase agreement securities into Treasuries, and the continuing downward trend of agency floater holdings.

Our WAM index for prime funds increased by five days, quarter-over-quarter, and is 20 days higher from the prior year's end. The government funds WAM index increased even more notably, ending the quarter higher by 11 days, three times more than at the end of 2022 (see table 2 and chart 4). We note that further maturity extension will be meaningfully affected by how much monetary tightening further deters aggregate consumption. Market participants are uncertain on the expected number range and timing of potential rate cuts.

Table 2

'AAAm' LGIP weighted average maturity (In days)
Index Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs 13 17 24 27 36
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs 26 30 36 41 46

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Economic Updates

LGIP portfolios typically hold high credit quality ('A-1' or higher) government, agency, and bank investments (see table 3 and chart 6). Accordingly, we cite some of the key takeaways from recent reports: "Credit Conditions North America Q1 2024: A Cluster of Stresses," Nov. 28, 2023, and "Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2024: Cooling Off But Not Breaking," Nov. 27,2023.

  • As normalization in the product and labor markets continues, disinflation will endure, albeit unevenly. S&P's economists continued to think that the Federal Reserve would hike federal funds rate by another 25 basis points (bps; likely December) before cuts start in mid-2024.
  • S&P Global Ratings now expects the U.S. economy to expand 1.5% in 2024 on an annual average basis (up from 1.3% in our September forecast) and 1.4% in 2025 (unchanged from the September forecast), before converging to the longer-run sustainable growth of 1.8% in 2026.
  • Credit stresses are growing, and borrowers will need to adjust to a new playing field in which financing conditions could become even tighter.
  • The costs of debt service and/or refinancing could be overly burdensome, especially for lower-rated borrowers.

Table 3

'AAAm' LGIP 'A-1+' credit quality (%)
Index Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs 99 99 99 99 99
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs 67 66 64 64 64

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Table 4

'AAAm' LGIPs--Top 10 By Assets
Government LGIPs
Principal stability fund rating Local government investment pool Net assets (mil. $) --Portfolio maturity (days)-- 'A-1+' credit quality (%) NAV per share
WAM-R WAM-F
AAAm TEXPOOL 31,478 37 90 100 0.99997
AAAm North Carolina Capital Management Trust - Government Portfolio 20,056 26 74 100 1.00012
AAAm New York Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (NY CLASS) 10,767 42 89 100 1.00006
AAAm Texas Short Term Asset Reserve (TexSTAR) Cash Reserve Fund 10,341 47 87 100 1.00002
AAAm Lone Star Investment Pool - Government Overnight Fund 6,300 41 103 100 1.00021
AAAm Pennsylvania School District Liquid Asset Fund - Max Series 3,170 35 39 100 1.00015
AAAm New Jersey Asset & Rebate Management Program/Joint Account 1,694 42 86 100 1.00016
AAAm New York Liquid Asset Fund - MAX Portfolio 1,566 43 43 100 1.00023
AAAm Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS Government) 1,357 22 75 100 1.00011
AAAm Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PRIME) 666 17 72 100 1.00010
Prime LGIPs
Principal stability fund rating Local government investment pool Net assets (mil. $) --Portfolio maturity (days)-- 'A-1+' credit quality (%) NAV per share
WAM-R WAM-F
AAAm Florida PRIME 28,094 40 69 56 1.00042
AAAm Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS) 21,359 52 78 61 1.00016
AAAm State Treasury Asset Reserve of Ohio (STAR OHIO) 19,589 45 59 63 1.00036
AAAm California Asset Management Trust/Cash Reserve Portfolio 17,667 49 67 54 1.00021
AAAm Connecticut State Treasurer's Short-Term Investment Fund 16,482 44 90 78 1.00015
AAAm TEXPOOL Prime 13,390 42 65 64 1.00042
AAAm Virginia Local Government Investment Pool 12,726 57 82 71 1.00020
AAAm Maryland Local Government Investment Pool 11,696 48 62 76 0.99990
AAAm Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PLUS+) 11,648 50 81 56 1.00023
AAAm Local Government Investment Cooperative 11,258 52 73 62 1.00048

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools

The 'AAAm' LGIP trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk, as defined in S&P Global Ratings' PSFR criteria.

LGIPs are present in many U.S. states where, generally, the state treasurer oversees a pooled investment vehicle that operates in a similar way to a money market fund. Typically a cost-effective investment option, LGIPs allow municipalities and public entities to combine their idle cash and operating balances to obtain economies of scale, through a diversified range of investments, to earn an incremental rate of return.

Unlike money market funds registered with the SEC, LGIPs are not regulated by the SEC and therefore not subject to SEC rule 2a-7. However, LGIPs typically benefit from the purview of state statutes, which provide guidelines on LGIPs' investment policy and objective, as well as from the standards and guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, where standard 79 allows the use of amortized cost to value an LGIP's portfolio assets.

Our LGIP metrics demonstrate the investment practices of 'AAAm' rated LGIPs and those conforming to our PSFR criteria. If an individual LGIP's metrics are below our benchmarks, this may indicate a more conservative approach to investment. Metrics well above our benchmarks may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit still within the range for a 'AAAm' PSFR.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Tyler Dunn, Farmers Branch +1 214 765 5869;
tyler.dunn@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Kara Wachsmann, Englewood + 303 721 4547;
kara.wachsmann@spglobal.com
Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642;
michael.masih@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in