articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240306-china-consumer-versus-global-peers-similar-ratings-different-stories-12994352 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China Consumer Versus Global Peers: Similar Ratings, Different Stories

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Is It Working? China's LGFV Debt De-Risk Program One Year On

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Inflation, China, And EV Transition Risks Casts Long Shadow On North American Auto Suppliers

NEWS

CrowdStrike Update Issues Highlight The Perils To Global IT Systems From Interdependency And Concentration


China Consumer Versus Global Peers: Similar Ratings, Different Stories

image

What do China consumer firms have in common with global peers? From a simple credit perspective, a lot. We rate many of these China companies in the category of 'A-' to 'A+', similar to Coca-Cola or from 'BBB-' to 'BBB+', the same as McDonald's. However, the China firms took very different paths to investment grade. These differences could have credit implications as the country's growth slows.

S&P Global Ratings has stable outlooks on the majority of China consumer companies we cover, in sectors ranging from staples like dairy to discretionary purchases, such as apparel and consumer appliances. We expect most of the rated companies in this sector to be financially cautious over the next year or two, while China's consumer sentiment and economy gradually improve.

Looking down the line, a different playbook might be necessary. China's growth rate is structurally slowing, and the catch-up development story for retail is somewhat fading. We expect China retail sales to increase 4.2% in 2024, underperforming GDP growth. In future, growth strategies might entail more mergers and acquisition (M&A), global expansion, and debt.

China's Domestic Markets Still Offer Good Relative Opportunities

Though slowing, economic growth in China will outpace global averages in the coming years.

Chart 1

image

We expect that in most segments, China's rated consumer companies will grow revenue at a faster pace than that of selected global leaders in the respective retail and consumer categories over the next few years (see chart 2).

Chart 2

image

However, Chinese consumers are becoming more cautious with spending amid a slower economic outlook. They are saving more and shying away from big ticket items such as property and new cars in the midst of higher financial uncertainty as the economy slows (see "China Retail: Tighter Belts, Broader Defenses," published on RatingsDirect on Oct. 16, 2023).

Shifting demographics, urbanization and lower birth rates are also changing consumption habits. Chinese consumers are more likely to spend on experiences and services (instead of buying a home). We believe this will support the growth of things such as travel and catering, and small luxury items such as high-end appliances, premium food or beverages products, cosmetics, or clothes.

The Winning Formula Is Changing For Chinese Consumer Firms

Historically, Chinese firms focused on the domestic Chinese market. With its high growth, there was little incentive for them to look for overseas growth. Many of international acquisitions were geared toward bring foreign goods and services into the Chinese market.

This means China's consumer sector is more geographically concentrated than that of global peers. By our estimates, 72% of the rated consumer firms have over 90% revenue originating from China. This concentration could result in higher volatility in EBITDA and cash flows versus more geographically more diversified firms.

Table 1

Strong domestic opportunities have kept China retail and consumer firms focused on home markets
Sector Company Portion of revenues from greater China  (%)
Apparel Bosideng 100
Beverage/Staples Tingyi 100
Dairy Mengniu 96
Restaurants Haidilao 92
Dairy Yili >90
Supplement/Dairy H&H 73
Staples Bright Foods 59
Appliances Midea 59
Agri COFCO <50
Staples WH Group 34
H&H--Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings. Sources: Company disclosures. S&P Global Ratings.

For example, baby-formula manufacturers face lower demand and hence increased competition, amid the structural decline in China's birth rate. Another example is impact of China's zero-COVID policies during the height of the pandemic. Profit and cash flows declined longer for China-only retailers and restaurants versus those with a global presence.

As the second derivative of China's growth decreases, consumer firms concentrated in China will be more sensitive to macro headwinds such as slower economic growth, deflation, and demographic changes.

At the same time, more sophisticated consumers, changing tastes and consumption habits will, in our view, require companies to increase innovation, deploy multi-brand/co-brand strategy or acquire emerging brands to keep up.

Along the way, they may learn from more established international peers that went through similar economic transitions decades ago. Chinese consumer firms may also need to focus more on shareholder returns when growth opportunities become more scarce, as is the case with Western peers.

The credit profiles of major global brands, such as McDonald's and Coca-Cola, benefit from strong global name recognition and diversified market exposures. This underpins solid investment grade (IG) ratings despite riskier financial policies relative to many of the IG China peers.

image

What's The Next Step For Chinese Consumer Firms?

Decelerating growth rates in China's consumer retail space will likely motivate new strategies, which could also raise risks.

Options on the table

More innovation?  Companies will likely accelerate new product roll-out, launch more tailored products or deploy novel marketing strategies to keep abreast of fast-changing consumer tastes and maintain their market shares.

More deals?   With China's growth structurally slowing, market leaders may look to enhance revenues through consolidation, expansion into different subsegments, or expansion overseas (including via M&A). One recent example, online retailer JD.com is reportedly considering a bid for U.K. electronics retailer Currys.

More risk?   Going offshore will expose the firms to more execution risks, including: culture and consumer behavior in different countries/markets and a different set of regulatory/geo-political risks (i.e., Australia barred a planned acquisition by China Mengniu Dairy). Chinese firms will also need to compete with larger global consumer brands in the absence of home advantages (e.g., brand recognition, knowhow on consumer preference, local supplier relationship etc.)

More debt?   The quickest way to enter a new market is through M&A. But the associated execution risk is high and would likely result in higher debt leverage. We believe Chinese consumer product firms will be more likely to pursue M&As in their pursuit of growth in the next decade.

Can China Brands Go Global?

China's efficient and low-cost production has helped some companies and brands compete globally. The success of fast fashion retailer Shein and budget e-commerce platform Temu, for example, is built on offering stylish products to young consumers at ultra-low cost. Other notable examples include consumer electronics brands Xiaomi and Oppo.

Product innovation also matters. For example, Midea's best-selling product in the U.S. is a U-shape window air conditioner tailored to address the needs of urban consumers in older apartments. We believe the design sold well because of its easy installation and quietness.

In short, Chinese consumer firms can expand overseas with the right price and right product. Yet different subsectors and firms, considering cultural limitation, political sensitivity and their respective preferences, may vary willingness and timing of going offshore.

In our view, appliances, apparel and dairy are subsectors that will continue to have stronger overseas expansion appetite, given price and product competitiveness.

image

Financial Policies: Change Will Be Gradual

We don't expect a sudden shift to the fairly conservative financial policies of rated Chinese consumer firms. Issuers are cautious on macro headwinds in China and would hesitate to take on incremental risks. We expect low leverage over the next 12-24 months (see chart 3).

Chart 3

image

That said, strategy shifts toward more M&A, global expansion, or higher shareholder returns could be on the cards for certain consumer niches. We believe that Chinese consumer product firms are more likely to pursue deals and investments in search of growth in the next decade. These investments could increase over the next few years when consumer confidence in China improves and firms have higher confidence in prospects of healthy growth.

If executed well, such shifts in strategy could bring growth and revenue diversity. They could also require more debt and leverage in the next decade. In short, if China consumer firms increasingly go global, their credit profiles would likely come to look more like global peers.

Writer: Cathy Holcombe

Digital design: Evy Cheung

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Flora Chang, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3545;
flora.chang@spglobal.com
Aras Poon, Hong Kong (852) 2532-8069;
aras.poon@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in