articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240313-charter-school-brief-california-13026309.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Charter School Brief: California

COMMENTS

History Of U.S. State Ratings

COMMENTS

U.S. State Ratings And Outlooks: Current List

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Outstanding Ratings And Outlooks As Of June 30, 2024


Charter School Brief: California

image

Overview

As of March 12, 2024, S&P Global Ratings maintains 44 public ratings on California charter schools. California has the highest number of rated charters schools, just ahead of Texas. In 1992, California became the second U.S. state to enact a charter school law. Today, it is home to about 1,300 charter schools that serve approximately 10% of the state's kindergarten through 12th-grade (K-12) students.

Chart 1

image

Overall, 38.6% of California charter school ratings are investment grade compared with 45% for the sector, as noted in our 2024 sector outlook for charter schools, published Jan. 17, 2024, on RatingsDirect. However, the modal rating is 'BB+', just one notch from investment grade, and accounting for 15, or 34% of ratings. We believe the slightly weaker rating profile for California charter schools compared with the sector as a whole stems from the prevalence of district-authorized schools (86% of all charter schools in the state), shifting demographic trends , higher leverage, and other case-by-case factors.

Authorizer Framework

  • In most cases, charter schools in California are authorized by the local school district for a maximum term of five years. The state's 40 county school boards and the state board of education may also authorize charter schools. Authorizers receive an oversight fee of up to 1% of revenue. Proposition 39 requires school districts to provide reasonably equivalent facilities to charter schools.
  • We believe the state outlines a clear process for authorization, renewal, revocation, and appeal of charters, although it is more difficult to assess if individual local education agencies apply the process consistently or what criteria each uses to monitor adherence to standards during the charter term. State law requires charter schools to meet a minimum level of academic performance before receiving renewals, and annual site visits by the authorizer, which we view positively.
  • Almost half of the charter schools we rate (21) are authorized by the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the second-biggest public school district and largest district charter school authorizer in the nation.

Credit Fundamentals

California charter schools' credit profiles are characterized by ratings ranging from 'B+' to 'BBB', with a median rating of 'BB+'. The majority (38) of our 44 rated charter schools are networks with more than one campus, supporting the comparatively higher median enrollment across the rating levels. The largest rated network, Aspire Public Schools (BBB/Stable), serves more than 15,400 students.

Table 1

Fiscal 2023 California charter school medians
BBB BBB- BB+ BB BB- /B+ California medians
No. of ratings 3 11 10 8 3 35
Enrollment fall 2021 9,889 1,622 1,480 990 1,870 1,522
Enrollment fall 2022 10,033 1,730 1,522 1,114 1,702 1,569
Change year over year (%) 1.5 0.2 2.3 (3.7) (9.0) 1.1
Waiting list as % of enrollment - fall 2022 49.1 23.9 16.4 1.7 1.9 15.3
Student retention rate (%) - fall 2022 90.3 92.2 91.9 86.8 71.0 90.3
Lease-adjusted MADS coverage (x) 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.8 0.7 1.9
Lease-adjusted MADS burden (% total revenues) 6.4 6.6 6.6 9.1 16.7 8.1
Days' unrestricted cash on hand 259 206 230 232 130 216
Unrestricted cash and investments to debt (%) 68.9 66.2 87.4 52.2 33.8 55.5
Total revenue ($000) 215,768 27,530 31,729 19,204 23,730 31,244
Total debt per student 18,852 14,570 14,438 26,469 28,079 19,187
Total revenue per student 21,506 19,090 21,700 21,353 19,426 20,760
MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Financials for fiscal 2023 available for 35 out of 44 entities (80%)

For rated charter schools in California, median days' cash on hand in fiscal 2023 increased to 215 days from 162 days in fiscal 2022, continuing a trend of improvement. Days' cash has increased by 2.5x, from about 87 days in fiscal 2017. This growth in liquidity has been supported by Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funding (which totaled $26.4 billion for all public K-12 schools across California) and by state per-pupil funding increases in recent years. Although schools' total debt and debt per student is often elevated in California due to higher capital and real estate costs, the medians show that stronger revenues help keep the lease-adjusted maximum annual debt service (MADS) burden somewhat in check at 8.1%.

Chart 2

image

After a long run of healthy annual enrollment growth, the 2021-2022 school year represented the first year of charter enrollment decline in decades (see chart 2), reflecting a combination of pandemic pressures and broader demographic trends within the state. We saw a similar trend among charter schools we rate, with a median year-over-year decline of 1.7% in fall 2021 but rebounding by 3.1% in fall 2022. Meanwhile, all public elementary and secondary school enrollment across the state has declined each year from 2019 to 2023. For the rated charter schools, preliminary data for the fall of 2023 indicate that, as observed for fall 2022 data, slightly more schools experienced enrollment growth than experienced enrollment decline. In aggregate, for the schools with increases, the average rate of growth was about the same as in the previous year, whereas for schools with declining enrollment, the losses have moderated.

What We're Watching

Charter renewal risk.   In fiscal 2023, 12 charter schools closed across the state; all voluntarily. However, in the two previous fiscal years, three schools closed due to charter revocation or not meeting conditions of approval (none of these schools were rated by S&P Global Ratings), underscoring the risk. Assembly Bill 130, passed in July 2021, automatically extended by two years the terms of any charter school whose term expires on or between Jan. 1, 2022 and June 30, 2025; and Senate Bill 114, passed in July 2023, extended by one additional year all charters statewide, without regard to a specific expiration date. While these measures temporarily mitigate renewal risk, ongoing authorizer support in future renewal discussions will remain paramount in the coming years.

Funding increases.   California charter schools have benefited from historic funding levels in recent years, and Proposition 98 funding (which establishes the minimum funding level for schools and community colleges) reached an all-time high in fiscal 2023. Then, the state's fiscal 2024 enacted budget reflected another year of increased funding, including an 8.22% increase to the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). The state's fiscal 2025 budget proposal indicates a budget gap of $37.9 billion and the use of one-time funds to address the shortfall. Although the governor is not proposing any mid-year cuts, deferrals, or program rollbacks, we believe that per-pupil funding will likely moderate from the highs of the past couple of years due to the softened economy and the state's depressed tax collections through fiscal 2023. In addition to LCCF revenue, charter schools and district schools are entitled to supplemental grant increases equal to 20% of the adjusted base grant for the percentage of enrolled students who are English learners, eligible for free or reduced-price meals program, or in foster care. The 2023-2024 budget includes $30 million in one-time Proposition 98 funding to support eligible facilities costs for the Charter School Facility Grant Program, which provides funding to offset facilities costs.

Enrollment trends.   California's K-12 total elementary and secondary school enrollment has fallen for five straight years, due to declining birth rates and other demographic factors such as outmigration. Longer term, the state has estimated that if current fertility and migration trends hold, enrollment statewide could decline by more than 10% by 2033. Although we are seeing stable demand for most rated charter schools as of fall 2023, we will continue to monitor the state's K-12 enrollment trends and charter schools' ability to maintain their momentum in the competition for a shrinking number of students.

Political environment.   Increased competition for a declining school-age population and the revenue associated with each student can increase tensions between authorizing school districts and charter schools. Proposals of legislation that could be deemed anti-charter occur regularly. Assembly Bill (AB) 1505, passed in 2019, has made it more difficult for new or expanding charter schools to get approval from authorizers, and for high-performing charter schools it can mean longer renewal terms or a more streamlined application process.

In February 2024, LAUSD narrowly adopted a co-location policy related to how it complies with Proposition 39, which governs how school districts make space available to charter schools. LAUSD has indicated that the new policy is an additional consideration when assessing Proposition 39 co-locations on its black student achievement program schools, priority schools, and community schools. Although it is still too early to determine any negative impacts from the implementation of the policy, there are concerns that charter schools currently leasing space in LAUSD facilities or those that would seek such space in the future, could have less access to shared campuses. While most of the charter schools authorized by LAUSD operate on their own campuses, about 50 campuses are shared. We will monitor developments for any charter schools that are co-located.

Labor challenges.   We continue to monitor the influence of inflationary pressures on labor costs and labor shortages, which could pressure school faculty operations. California, Nevada, and Utah are among the states facing the most pressure to fill vacancies. Not all schools have been affected by the teacher shortage equally, and we believe a charter school's ability to attract and retain talented faculty is key to the organization achieving its mission.

Long-term use of one-time funds.   ESSER funds provided significant operating revenue to traditional public and charter schools. Many schools used emergency funding to hire additional full- or part-time staff to address learning loss amid the pandemic. As the wave of federal relief expires in September 2024, the budgetary transition should be relatively smooth for schools that have been using these funds for one-time needs only, but those that have been relying on emergency money for regular and recurring expenses could face a "fiscal cliff" with significant operating pressures.

Pension funding levels.   We view credit risks related to pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) as manageable in the near term, given the state's funding progress. For fiscal 2024, the governor did not propose any additional funding for the California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) or California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS). Based on current assumptions, CalPERS employer contributions increased to 26.68% in fiscal 2024 from 25.37% , while CalSTRS employer contribution rates were unchanged from the previous year at 19.1%. We will continue to assess the state's assumptions and schools' contributions, and how schools manage rising fixed costs. For more information on the State of California's pension and OPEB plans, see "Pension Spotlight: California," published Oct. 17, 2023, on RatingsDirect.

Table 2

California charter schools ratings list
Charter school Rating Outlook Charter authorizer* Charter contract expiration§
Albert Einstein Academies BB Stable San Diego USD 6/30/2027
Alliance for College-Gertz-Ressler Richard Merkin 6-12 Complex BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2027
Alliance for College-Patti and Peter Neuwirth Leadership Academy BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2027
Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools BBB Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
American Heritage Education Foundation BBB- Stable Escondido USD 6/30/2026
Aspire Public Schools BBB Stable LAUSD, Lodi USD, San Juan USD, Oakland USD, Ravenswood City School District, Stockton USD, Sacramento USD, Modesto City High, Modesto City Elementary 6/30/2026
Bright Star Schools BB+ Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Caliber Schools BBB- Stable Contra Costa County Office of Education 6/30/2026
Camino Nuevo Charter Academy BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2026
Citizens Of The World Charter Schools-Los Angeles BB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Classical Academy Inc. BBB- Stable Escondido Union Elem School District, Escondido Union High School District, San Diego Board of Education and Oceanside USD 6/30/2027
Environmental Charter Schools BB+ Stable Los Angeles County Office of Education, Lawndale Elementary School District 6/30/2025
Equitas Academy Charter School BB+ Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Fenton Charter Public Schools BB+ Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Granada Hills Charter BBB Stable LAUSD 6/30/2027
Green Dot Public Schools BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Grimmway Schools BB+ Stable Kern County Board of Education and Richland USD 6/30/2025
Harbor Springs Charter Schools BB+ Stable San Diego County Office of Education, Julian Union Elementary District, California State Board of Education 6/30/2026
Hawking STEAM Charter School BB+ Stable Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD) 6/30/2025
ICEF View Park Preparatory Accelerated Charter High School BB Negative LAUSD 6/30/2026
ICEF View Park Preparatory Accelerated Charter Middle and Elementary School BB Negative LAUSD 6/30/2025
John Adams Academies Inc. BB Stable Roseville Joint Union High School District, Western Placer USD, and El Dorado County Office of Education 6/30/2026
Julian Charter School B+ Stable Julian Union Elementary School District 6/30/2026
King Chavez Academies BB+ Stable San Diego USD 6/30/2026
KIPP Northern California Schools BBB Stable Oakland USD + 10 different authorizers 6/30/2025
KIPP SoCal Public Schools BBB Stable LAUSD, Compton USD, San Diego USD, and Los Angeles County Office of Education 6/30/2025
Learning Choice Academy BBB- Stable San Diego USD, Chula Vista Elementary and Grossmont Union High School District 6/30/2025
Lifeline Education Charter School BB+ Stable Compton USD 6/30/2025
Literacy First Charter School BBB- Stable San Diego County Office of Education 6/30/2026
Magnolia Science Academy BB Stable LAUSD, Los Angeles County Office of Education, San Diego USD and California State Board of Education 6/30/2025
New Designs Charter School BB+ Stable LAUSD 6/30/2026
Nova Academy BB Stable Santa Ana USD 6/30/2026
Partnerships to Uplift Communities (PUC Schools) BB+ Stable LAUSD 6/30/2026
Palmdale Aerospace Academy (The) BB Stable Palmdale Elementary School District 6/30/2025
Renaissance Arts Academy BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2026
River Charter Schools BB Stable River Delta USD and Washington USD 6/30/2027
River Springs Charter School BB+ Stable Riverside County Office of Education 6/30/2026
Rocklin Academies BB+ Stable Rocklin USD and Newcastle Elementary School District 6/30/2026
Santa Rosa Academy Inc. BB+ Stable Menifee Union Elementary District 6/30/2026
STEM Preparatory Schools BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Urban Discovery Academy BB- Stable San Diego USD 6/30/2026
Value Schools BBB- Stable LAUSD 6/30/2025
Vista Charter Public Schools BB Stable LAUSD and Orange County Department of Education 6/30/2027
Yu Ming Charter School BB+ Stable Alameda County Board of Education (ACBOE) 6/30/2028
*San Diego Unified School District (USD), Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), Escondido Union School District (USD), San Juan Unified School District (USD), Lodi Unified School District (USD), Stockton Unified School District (USD), Oakland Unified School District (USD), Sacramento Unified School District (USD), Oceanside Unified School District (USD), Richland Unified School District (USD), Western Placer Unified School District (USD), Compton Unified School District (USD), Santa Ana Unified School District (USD), River Delta Unified School District (USD), Washington Unified School District (USD), Rocklin Unified School District (USD). §Charter renewal dates reflect the two-year automatic renewal under Assembly Bill 130 (2021) and a one-year extension under SB 114 (2023).

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Peter V Murphy, New York + 1 (212) 438 2065;
peter.murphy@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Robert Tu, CFA, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5087;
robert.tu@spglobal.com
Avani K Parikh, Phoenix + 1 (212) 438 1133;
avani.parikh@spglobal.com
Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004;
jessica.wood@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Tanmay Shah, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in