articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240620-credit-faq-how-will-nan-fung-navigate-hong-kong-s-property-downturn-13146393 content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

Credit FAQ: How Will Nan Fung Navigate Hong Kong's Property Downturn?

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Is It Working? China's LGFV Debt De-Risk Program One Year On

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Inflation, China, And EV Transition Risks Casts Long Shadow On North American Auto Suppliers

NEWS

CrowdStrike Update Issues Highlight The Perils To Global IT Systems From Interdependency And Concentration


Credit FAQ: How Will Nan Fung Navigate Hong Kong's Property Downturn?

HONG KONG (S&P Global Ratings) June 20, 2024--As Hong Kong's property market cools, interest in Nan Fung International Holdings Ltd. is heating up. Investors are asking us for clarity on the factors underpinning Nan Fung's stable credit quality in a tough property market, particularly as the company is at the lower end of investment grade (BBB-/Stable/--). It is also less well known than the blue-chip property names we rate, and its business model differs from that of its peers.

The Hong Kong property market remains difficult. We expect home prices to further decline by 5%-10% in 2024, due to oversupply and high interest rates. Hong Kong home prices have already fallen by 22% from August 2021 to the end of 2023. Office vacancies have increased to nearly 13% from under 10% during the same period.

In this report, we address frequently asked questions from investors about the issuer's strategy toward property development and managing rental properties. The firm's high leverage must be viewed in the context of its low gearing, in our view. We also explain how we consider its financial investments in our rating construct. Finally, we discuss what its private ownership structure means for its governance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Nan Fung a property developer or landlord?

In our view, Nan Fung is a property developer with a growing portfolio of rental properties.

Property development remains the core business of Nan Fung despite the increasing importance of its rental portfolio. Management of the company indicates that property development is here to stay. The company had maintained its presence in the Hong Kong property development space since 1965.

Chart 1

image

While we estimate Nan Fung's EBITDA contribution from rental income will increase to more than 60% over the next two years, from 40% in fiscal 2023 (year ending March 31, 2023), this should be temporary. We believe the company will resume land acquisition for development when home prices in Hong Kong stabilize. In the meantime, the company will focus on managing its rental properties.

Our rating on Nan Fung uses our homebuilder (developer) criteria as we still see property development as its main business. In order for our real estate (landlord) criteria to be applicable, the company needs to demonstrate a sustained strategy of concentrating on its rental portfolio.

What is Nan Fung's exposure to property development in Hong Kong during the current downturn?

Nan Fung has one of the lowest exposures to property development among rated Hong Kong developers. It also has no exposure to residential property development in mainland China.

Nan Fung can manage the impact from continued falling home prices because its property development pipeline is limited. It has sold over 90% of Lohas Park 10, a mass-market housing complex in Tseung Kwan O, a Hong Kong suburb. The firm sold most of the residences in fiscal 2023 before home prices took a deeper dive. The company's decision not to replenish any major development projects since 2017 has also proven prescient.

Nan Fung's remaining projects are selling very slowly as they are mainly luxury properties with a high price tag. The company only has seven key projects lined up. Three are small-scale projects under development. The remaining four are completed.

Table 1

Nan Fung has lined up a modest slate of projects
Project Location Under development/completed Expected completion Remaining attributable GFA (sq.ft.) as of September 2023 Nan Fung's interest (%)
Tong Yan San Tsuen Residential Project Yuen Long, Hong Kong Under development 2025 41,000 50.00
Jardine Court Jardine's Lookout, Hong Kong Under development 2026 29,000 100.00
Chai Wan Commercial Project Chai Wan, Hong Kong Under development To be confirmed 76,000 50.00
Lohas Park 10 Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong Completed N.A. 156,000 100.00
Deep Water Bay Drive Deep Water Bay, Hong Kong Completed N.A. 52,000 85.00
Mount Nicholson The Peak, Hong Kong Completed N.A. 9,000 50.00
One Oasis/Sky Oasis/Grand Oasis Macau Completed N.A. 156,000* 17.00
*Saleable floor area. GFA--Gross floor area. sq. ft.--Square feet. N.A.--Not available. Source: Company presentations.
How is Nan Fung's rental portfolio performing amid the downturn in Hong Kong's office sector?

We expect Nan Fung's rental income to grow to HK$2.5 billion in fiscal 2024, and to HK$2.6 billion in fiscal 2025, from HK$2.4 billion in fiscal 2023, due to new rental properties.

The company opened its flagship project in Hong Kong, Airside, in September 2023. Due to stiff challenge in the office sector, office occupancy rate at Airside was 13% as of Sept. 30, 2023, while the project's retail space was better with 67% occupied. Another office building in Shanghai, Yi Fung Place (formerly C8), will open in late 2024. The ramp-up of these two assets will be gradual due to weak office demand, yet any additional tenants will bring rental income.

Including the two new assets above, Nan Fung's portfolio of rental properties will increase to 13.2 million square feet (sq. ft.) by fiscal 2025 from 11.4 million sq. ft. as of fiscal 2023. In total, the company will have more than 34 assets in its rental portfolio.

Existing rental properties, particularly office assets, are facing pressure. Occupancy rates, excluding Airside, have dropped slightly in the six months ending Sept. 30, 2023. Average occupancy rate was at 91% in Hong Kong, 85% in mainland China, and 69% overseas. This compares with 92% in Hong Kong, 87% in mainland China, and 71% overseas as of end-fiscal 2023. A move to convert offices to laboratory space has temporarily lowered the overseas occupancy rate. Capital expenditure will likely be about HK$3.5 billion in fiscal 2025.

Diversification across asset classes and geography will partially offset office pressure. Nan Fung's laboratory assets are still performing well. About 60% of rental income is from office, 25% is from retail, and 15% is from laboratory and others. Hong Kong, mainland China, and overseas (the U.S. and the U.K.) each contributes about a third to rental income.

How do we monitor Nan Fung's financial risks given the volatility of its leverage?

We take a holistic view by considering Nan Fung's leverage, as measured by debt-to-EBITDA, and gearing, as measured by debt to debt-plus-equity.

While leverage is an important measure for property developers, we believe gearing is also suitable for Nan Fung. This is because the company's rental income has steadily grown for more than a decade and reached a significant portion of total revenue. In our view, gearing can better reflect the company's balance sheet health and supports our assessment of its financial risk profile.

Chart 2

image

We expect Nan Fung's ratio of debt to debt-plus-equity to remain at a low level of 27.2% as of end-fiscal 2024, and 28.0% as of end-fiscal 2025. This compares with 26.8% as of end-fiscal 2023.

We forecast leverage will increase to 13.4x in fiscal 2024 from 6.2x in fiscal 2023, and remain high at 11.6x in fiscal 2025. This is due to the absence of sizable property development project recognition and slower sales of its luxury projects.

What is Nan Fung doing to adapt to high interest rates?

Nan Fung is reducing its debt and generating more recurring rental income to manage higher interest rates.

We expect EBITDA interest coverage will weaken to 1.2x in fiscal 2024, and to 1.4x in fiscal 2025 from 3.0x in fiscal 2023. This is due to lower property development sales and rising interest expenses, which climbed to HK$1.9 billion in fiscal 2024, from HK$1.6 billion in fiscal 2023. Almost two-thirds (62%) of the firm's debt was fixed-rate as of Sept. 30, 2023, helping it manage rising interest rates. The fixed-rate portion will likely stay above half of all debt.

We believe Nan Fung's debt-servicing capability is adequate. The company's annual rental income of more than HK$2.4 billion can fully cover its interest costs. In addition, the company is managing its adjusted debt level carefully. It cut its debt by 13% to HK$30.0 billion in the period from end-fiscal 2022 to Sept. 30, 2023, to minimize the effects of higher interest rates. We expect debt levels to stay steady until fiscal 2025.

How do we account for Nan Fung's financial investment portfolio?

We applied a very positive capital structure modifier. This provides two notches of uplift to the rating.

In our view, the portfolio (worth HK$29.2 billion as of Sept. 30, 2023) is large enough to address most of the company's adjusted debt of HK$30.0 billion if it ever needs to be disposed. Importantly, the portfolio is not leveraged. This provides Nan Fung with substantial financial flexibility.

We expect the portfolio will remain valuable enough to continue to give Nan Fung a two-notch ratings uplift. The portfolio value should be stable, despite declining from HK$33.6 billion since 2021. The expectation reflects a recovering Hong Kong equity market, and a strong U.S. stock market. The company will also allocate more investment toward fixed income, which may benefit from interest rate cuts.

As we have factored in the benefits of its portfolio in the capital structure modifier, we exclude its asset value and dividend income generated from our financial ratios. Only property-related income is included in our credit metrics calculation.

Nan Fung Trinity manages the investment portfolio. The entity is a licensed asset management subsidiary of Nan Fung. Nan Fung Trinity has very limited third-party exposure.

Chart 3

image

Industry wise, the portfolio is mainly invested in health care, technology, finance, infrastructure, and exchange-traded funds. Geographically, it is focused on Hong Kong, mainland China, and the U.S.

How do we view Nan Fung's management and governance considering its privately owned status?

We assess Nan Fung's management and governance as neutral. In our view, the company has satisfactory risk management and adequate reporting, despite concentrated ownership by the Chen family.

Nan Fung had always maintained a healthy balance sheet. Gearing remained at a modest level for over a decade with a peak of 32.1% as of end-fiscal 2018, when the firm acquired Airside. The company also makes sure recurring income from rental and dividends will fully cover interest payments. Its leverage levels are volatile and less of a focus.

Nan Fung was previously publicly listed but was taken private in 1989. While no longer compulsory, we believe it has kept its reporting standard at an adequate level. The company discloses annual financial statements audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers, and unaudited interim statements. It also publishes detailed result presentations semi-annually and make announcements of material acquisitions on its website.

Nan Fung's board of directors has eight people including three independent non-executive directors. There are also multiple governance committees, of which the conflicts, audit and risk management, and remuneration committees are comprised only of non-executive and independent non-executive directors to ensure a balanced oversight.

The main consideration for Nan Fung's management and governance lies in the concentrated family ownership through the Chen Foundation and individual family members. This may expose the firm to related-party transactions or high dividend payouts at the expense of Nan Fung's credit quality. Nevertheless, we do not see this as a critical issue given the company's satisfactory management and governance record.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

The report is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may purchase a copy of the report by sending an e-mail to research_request@spglobal.com. Ratings information can also be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website by using the Ratings search box at www.spglobal.com/ratings.

Primary Credit Analyst:Jay Lau, Hong Kong +852 2533 3568;
jay.lau@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Ricky Tsang, Hong Kong (852) 2533-3575;
ricky.tsang@spglobal.com
Media Contacts:Ning Ma, Hong Kong (852) 2912-3029;
ning.ma@spglobal.com
Michelle Lei, Beijing + 86 10 6569 2961;
michelle.lei@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in