articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240627-your-three-minutes-in-china-lgfv-bonds-weaker-entities-go-long-13161578 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In China LGFV Bonds: Weaker Entities Go Long

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: Are The Olympics A Budgetary Burden For Paris?

COMMENTS

Americas Sovereign Rating Trends Midyear 2024: Highest Number Of Positive Outlooks Since 2011

COMMENTS

European Developed Markets Sovereign Rating Trends Midyear 2024: Lagging Regional Growth Could Weigh On Public Finances

COMMENTS

Asia-Pacific Sovereign Rating Trends Midyear 2024: Fiscal Strains Rise


Your Three Minutes In China LGFV Bonds: Weaker Entities Go Long

Regulators are giving some Chinese LGFVs and local SOEs greater access to long bonds.  Previously, only large central state-owned enterprises (SOEs) could issue ultra-long bonds at tenors of 30 years or longer. Now we are seeing more long-bonds (tenors of 10 years or greater) from local government financial vehicles (LGFVs), and increased ultra-long bonds from local SOEs. The upshot for investors is they will be offered very long-dated bonds from some of China's weaker entities, presenting policy and interest-rate risks over the tenor of the instrument.

What's Happening

China is rethinking about how it uses corporate long bonds.  We believe authorities are increasingly open to letting some issuers use the instrument to manage liquidity generally, and to extend maturing debt significantly.

  • Wuxi Industry Development Group Co. Ltd., an industrial investment SOE, is reportedly marketing a 50-year bond.
  • Several months ago, Hangzhou City Construction Investment Group Ltd., an SOE consolidating the city's utilities, public transportation, energy, and policy housing assets issued 10-year and 20-year bonds of Chinese renminbi (RMB) 1 billion, for refinancing purposes.
  • Earlier this month, Chongqing Yufu Holding Group Co. Ltd. issued a RMB1.5 billion 30-year ultra-long bond.

Long bonds were previously used primarily to fund projects with long lifecycles; now it is being used more by LGFVs, largely for refinancing. About 95% of such issuance from LGFVs this year has been used for debt repayment, a sharp increase from just 32% three years ago.

Chart 1

image

Why It Matters

The measures are aimed at fixing liquidity strains.  We believe regulators will approve more long bonds (tenors of 10 years of more) from LGFVs grappling with debt servicing. The percentage of long bonds issued (of the total LGFV long bonds issued) by LGFVs from highly indebted regions has jumped to 20% from zero over the past couple of years. In our view, use of such instruments is part of debt resolution measures that have flowed from the so-called "package of measures" policies announced in the second half of 2023 (see "China Policy Patches Alone Won't Fix LGFVs' Fraying Liquidity, Sept. 7, 2023).

As authorities give weaker entities more access to long bonds, investors will face more risks.  China hasn't offered a comprehensive solution for LGFVs to deleverage, in our view. Instead, authorities are chipping away at the debt risks by extending maturities, lowering funding costs, and allowing local governments to issue bonds to settle the off-balance sheet debt held by LGFVs. Bondholders could face risks on their long-dated LGFV debt if governments reduce support for such issuers, or if interest rates rise.

What Comes Next

Many LGFVs will likely continue to face limited access to debt markets.   Regulators' relaxed stance toward the use of long bonds is highly selective. It is targeted at entities in the most urgent need, we believe, to let such issuers take advantage of currently favorable market conditions. Other entities, whether more creditworthy or not, will likely have less access. For example, in the first half of 2024, only a few firms from the highly indebted regions of Guizhou and Chongqing were able to issue 10-year bonds.

Editor: Jasper Moiseiwitsch

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Laura C Li, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3583;
laura.li@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Christopher Yip, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3593;
christopher.yip@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Harry Yuan, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.