articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240725-economic-research-paving-the-way-efficient-infrastructure-key-to-emerging-asia-s-growth-13183497.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: Paving The Way: Efficient Infrastructure Key To Emerging Asia's Growth

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Global Economic Outlook Q1 2025: Buckle Up

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q1 2025: Trade Uncertainty Threatens Growth

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Canada Q1 2025: Immigration Policies Hamper Growth Expectations


Economic Research: Paving The Way: Efficient Infrastructure Key To Emerging Asia's Growth

Improved infrastructure will underpin strong growth in emerging Asia-Pacific ex-China. We continue to expect that in 2023 price terms, the economy will expand to US$11.4 trillion by 2033 from US$6.6 trillion in 2023. This translates to an annual real growth rate of about 5.5%. Our baseline forecast incorporates improved infrastructure as a cornerstone supporting these strong growth outcomes.

Infrastructure Equals Growth

Policymakers agree that sustaining high rates of growth requires meaningful investment and infrastructure. Several governments have made infrastructure development a key policy. India is a recent example where the central government has expanded infrastructure outlays. Regional initiatives are promoting sustainable infrastructure development through multilateral institutions such as Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, and ASEAN.

Making Infrastructure Profitable: Onus On The Public Sector

The public sector tends to bear much of the responsibility for infrastructure delivery. Returns on investment are spread over two or more decades, meaning duration risk for the private sector is high. The benefits of infrastructure accrue for several different parties, including those who don't directly use the infrastructure service.

As such, infrastructure operators cannot easily get revenue from these people for the benefits they obtain from the project. Consumers may, for instance, derive quicker delivery times for consumer products without ever having to use an expanded port and connecting infrastructure. These factors mean that operating infrastructure profitably is difficult and puts more onus on the public sector.

This does not rule out a role for the private sector. The private sector favors bottom lines and is hence better at innovating, and can typically operate faster and more efficiently. Private capital can ease the capital outlay burden on cash-strapped governments already committed to wide-ranging spending priorities. Still, the durations, regulated rates of return, and other project risks mean that the public sector dominates the space.

Data from the IMF's Investment and Capital Stock Database show variation in public capital stocks relative to the size of the economy (chart 1). Due to fast-growing economies, and after factoring in depreciation, public assets relative to economic size have not been deepening significantly. Public fixed investment assets are sizeable in Malaysia and Thailand; and by contrast, relatively low in the Philippines and Indonesia.

However, in the Philippines and Indonesia public-private partnership capital assets are higher than global averages. In the Philippines they are about 6.7% of GDP; in Indonesia it's about 4.2% of GDP, which would add to the available total public assets.

Chart 1

image

Better Logistics, Better Growth

The policy focus on infrastructure has improved outcomes. According to the United Nations Energy Statistics Database, installed power generation capacity has jumped (chart 2). There has also been progress in areas such as fiber coverage and data center construction.

Chart 2

image

Logistics Performance Index (LPI) scores for emerging markets in Asia have improved since 2014 (chart 3). LPI is the World Bank's measure for infrastructure delivery. It surveys logistics providers globally on various aspects of a country's logistics outcomes. India and the Philippines have seen the largest improvement since 2014 whereas Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia saw more modest improvements. In Indonesia, the logistics performance score declined marginally.

Chart 3

image

Improved logistics performance may support growth. There is positive correlation between an economy's LPI score and GDP per capita (chart 4). Improved infrastructure performance raises an economy's productive capacity. Firms need to be able to easily, quickly, and cost-efficiently source and ship inputs and products to maintain smooth operations and boost competitiveness.

Chart 4

image

Soft aspects such as shipment-tracking or the regulatory environment are important determinants of overall logistics performance. Among LPI sub-scores across emerging Asia, ease and predictability of border clearance and customs is a key bottleneck. Infrastructure is a strength for higher-income economies in the region, but not for emerging markets, suggesting some room for improvement. Timeliness is seen as a stronger area for these economies.

Chart 5

image

Creative Approaches To Boost Infrastructure

Economies can unlock higher growth rates through more infrastructure relative to the size of the economy, and through more efficient use of that infrastructure. As economies grow, they will need to invest more just to maintain enough infrastructure compared with the larger economy. Emerging Asia has higher growth rates than the global median: just sustaining the capital stock relative to the economy requires meaningful investment.

In addition, these economies will have to grow their capital stocks relative to the economy to support higher income levels. This means there are three investment requirements for economies: (1) replace and maintain depreciating capital; (2) support the growth of the economy to ensure adequate levels of capital stock relative to the economy; and (3) grow capital stocks relative to the economy to unlock higher growth rates.

Parts of the region that can leverage creative options for improving infrastructure delivery can improve potential growth. Such efficiency gains are particularly important as the pandemic eroded the available public funding for infrastructure outlays in the region (chart 6). This means growing public infrastructure assets may be harder. India and Malaysia have relatively lower available fiscal space, higher net government debt to GDP, and may face more constraints on future infrastructure spending.

Chart 6

image

Boosting soft infrastructure has an important role to play in improving overall infrastructure efficiency. Examples of soft infrastructure include streamlining regulations, process improvements, more efficient maintenance, and enabling greater private sector participation. Streamlining customs procedures or deregulating tariffs on utilities can smoothen logistics performance, improve returns, and increase efficiency of existing investment.

The soft approach can yield material benefits and minimize lower direct public sector capital outlays. Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines have tighter bottlenecks around soft infrastructure and as a result may gain more from this area.

Powering emerging Asia's growth requires large investment and greater investment efficiency. The region has made big strides on both fronts, putting economies on course for strong growth over the coming years. Countries will need to keep investing to improve and expand infrastructure that supports growth and ensure climate resilience too.

Growing infrastructure relative to the economy will be no easy task, given competition from other important policy areas for available public resources. But the logistics of what's ahead are clear cut: invest in priority areas and improve infrastructure efficiency to raise potential growth.

Editor: Lex Hall

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Asia-Pacific Economist:Vishrut Rana, Asia-Pacific Economist, Singapore + 65 6216 1008;
vishrut.rana@spglobal.com
Asia-Pacific Chief Economist:Louis Kuijs, Hong Kong +852 9319 7500;
louis.kuijs@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in