articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240827-your-three-minutes-in-capital-markets-the-effects-of-sukuk-defaults-13226004.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Capital Markets: The Effects Of Sukuk Defaults

COMMENTS

Idling Auto Sales Limit Upside For U.S. Auto Sector Ratings

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In AI: Financial Systems Will Face New Systemic Risks

Leveraged Finance & CLOs Uncovered Podcast: What's New For CLOs?


Your Three Minutes In Capital Markets: The Effects Of Sukuk Defaults

Sukuk defaults remain rare, particularly for sukuk issued in hard currencies, such as USD, EUR, or GBP.  Only 12 foreign currency-denominated sukuk defaulted over the past two decades. In most cases, these defaults were linked to the default of sukuk sponsors--who were unable to meet their financial obligations--and fraud cases. That relatively low default rate results from the fact that most sukuk are issued by creditworthy governments and their related entities, as well as large companies and financial institutions. In most default cases we observed, sukuk creditors were treated equally to conventional creditors. Yet this dynamic could change if Sharia Standard 62 comes into force.

image

What's Happening

Only 0.2% of sukuk defaulted over the past 24 years.  Of the 22,794 sukuk issued for a total amount of about $2.1 trillion since Jan. 1, 2000, only 62 sukuk worth $5.2 billion defaulted. Foreign currency-denominated sukuk defaults are even rarer. Between Jan. 1, 2000, and Aug. 15, 2024, only 12 sukuk worth $3.7 billion defaulted out of the 1,267 sukuk that were denominated in hard currencies and issued for a total amount of $527.5 billion.

Why It Matters

Sukuk defaults are often linked to liquidity issues and sukuk sponsors' inability to meet their financial obligations.  For example, Investment Dar defaulted on its $100 million sukuk in 2009 as it was reportedly unable to refinance upcoming maturities due to difficult market conditions. Garuda Indonesia defaulted on its $500 million sukuk in 2021 because the COVID-19 pandemic impaired the company's business activity. Sukuk defaults also resulted from financial fraud, as was the case with NMC Healthcare Ltd.'s default on a $400 million sukuk in 2020 and Saad Group's default on the $650 million Golden Belt sukuk in 2009. We understand that sukuk creditors were mostly treated similarly to other creditors and according to their ranking when the sukuk defaulted.

What Comes Next

The potential change in Sharia standards requires close surveillance.  The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions' proposed Sharia Standard 62 could lead to a significant overhaul of sukuk structures. Generally, the adoption of new standards does not affect existing sukuk as any changes in the terms and conditions of sukuk are subject to investors' consent.

The timeline for the adoption of Sharia Standard 62 and its definitive version remain uncertain.  If Sharia Standard 62 is adopted as proposed, we think the treatment of sukuk holders in a default scenario could differ from that of other creditors. We consider that the treatment could ultimately depend on the nature of the underlying assets and sukuk holders' capacity to liquidate them.

We envisage that Sharia Standard 62, if adopted as proposed, could lead to some instances of restructuring of outstanding sukuk.  Companies with financial difficulties or unsustainable debt levels, as well as companies that are less reliant on the sukuk market or that face imminent liquidity issues, could use the change in Sharia requirements as an argument to restructure their outstanding sukuk. That was the case when Dana Gas PJSC restructured its two sukuk after it defaulted on them in 2016. That said, we expect companies will avoid restructuring their sukuk based on Sharia changes because it could restrict their market access or even trigger cross defaults. At Aug. 15, 2024, 9% of the sukuk rated by S&P Global Ratings were in the speculative-grade category ('BB+' and below.)

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Mohamed Damak, Dubai + 97143727153;
mohamed.damak@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Sapna Jagtiani, Dubai + 97143727122;
sapna.jagtiani@spglobal.com
Xavier Jean, Singapore + 65 6239 6346;
xavier.jean@spglobal.com
Anais Ozyavuz, Paris + 33 14 420 6773;
anais.ozyavuz@spglobal.com
Dhruv Roy, Dubai + 971(0)56 413 3480;
dhruv.roy@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in