articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241001-u-s-community-college-district-fiscal-2023-medians-a-reason-for-optimism-as-a-new-school-year-gets-under-way-13248743 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Community College District Fiscal 2023 Medians: A Reason For Optimism As A New School Year Gets Under Way

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

Five Takeaways From U.S. Public Finance In 2024: Uneven Credit Trends Emerge Amid Rising Uncertainty

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Higher Education Outlook 2025: The Credit Quality Divide Widens

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Acute Health Care 2025 Outlook: Stable But Shaky For Many Amid Uneven Recovery And Regulatory Challenges


U.S. Community College District Fiscal 2023 Medians: A Reason For Optimism As A New School Year Gets Under Way

Fiscal 2023 was not without its challenges as most U.S. community colleges had exhausted emergency federal money and enrollment was still recovering from previous declines. However, higher levels of state support fueled by improved state credit quality helped management teams as they returned to an operating structure more in line with pre-pandemic models.

image

S&P Global Ratings had 199 public ratings on community colleges as of Aug. 15, 2024. These ratings range from 'AAA' to 'BBB', with more than 60% of institutions rated in the 'AA' category and almost 30% in the 'A' category, along with only 14 colleges in the 'AAA' category and three colleges in the 'BBB' category. Therefore, changes in median metrics for these rating categories might represent the variability associated with a small sample size, rather than wholesale differences in credit quality. There are currently no non-investment-grade ratings for U.S. community colleges.

Most of our rated community colleges have a stable outlook (195 of 199), three have a negative outlook, and one has a positive outlook.

Chart 1

image

All data and ratings included in this report are as of Aug. 15, 2024. We excluded the financial data for three institutions that had not yet published fiscal 2023 audits as of this date. All of our rated community colleges follow Governmental Accounting Standards Board standards. Although we rate other types of debt for community colleges, such as off-balance sheet housing debt, the data in this report reflects the underlying credit characteristics of publicly rated community colleges, community college districts, or systems. S&P Global Ratings publishes these medians as general benchmarks to observe broader sector trends. The credit analysis for any institution involves an assessment of qualitative factors that are beyond the scope of this article. Therefore, these medians should not be considered thresholds to achieve a particular rating.

Table 1

U.S. community colleges sectorwide fiscal 2023 medians
2021 2022 2023
Full-time-equivalent (FTE) enrollment (no.) 5,455 5,033 5,439
Service area population (no.) 265,455 267,780 265,768
Net (adjusted) operating income (%) 7.2 7.4 6.7
State appropriations dependence (%) 21.3 21.3 21.9
Student dependence (%) 17.6 16.9 18.0
Taxes and other local support dependence (%) 26.0 25.3 27.9
Cash and investments to operations (%) 81.3 88.6 100.5
Total cash and investments to total debt (%) 98.3 108.8 125.0
Average age of plant (years) 13.9 13.5 13.0
MADS burden (%) 8.4 8.4 9.0
Total debt per FTE ($) 14,309 14,419 14,852
State appropriations per FTE ($) 4,138 4,701 4,930
MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Table 2

U.S. community colleges fiscal 2023 medians by rating category
AAA AA+ AA AA- A+ A A- BBB/BBB+ Sectorwide
Full-time-equivalent (FTE) enrollment (no.) 22,536 12,952 7,094 3,061 2,148 2,135 2,683 2,282 5,439
Service area population (no.) 1,228,086 760,125 351,674 168,442 86,116 75,508 361,811 774,948 265,768
Net adjusted operating income (%) 10.6 5.1 7.1 5.7 8.7 4.5 5.0 (0.0) 6.7
State appropriations dependence (%) 12.4 19.9 23.1 22.2 25.4 18.8 23.4 30.0 21.9
Student dependence (%) 13.5 16.4 8.5 19.3 18.7 30.8 30.7 30.5 18.0
Taxes and other local support dependence (%) 50.0 35.1 27.2 28.5 21.3 10.4 5.7 22.4 27.9
Cash and investments to operations (%) 103.8 102.8 103.8 93.2 90.3 55.9 92.2 59.5 100.5
Total cash and investments to total debt (%) 80.7 127.2 117.5 117.3 198.3 193.1 94.9 200.8 125.0
Average age of plant (years) 12.8 13.0 12.4 13.3 14.4 13.5 13.9 19.1 13.0
MADS burden (%) 13.3 10.0 11.5 9.4 6.1 5.7 8.8 2.6 9.0
Total debt per FTE ($) 27,192 16,515 22,303 12,482 12,047 4,700 12,949 6,198 14,852
State appropriations per FTE ($) 2,832 4,415 5,435 5,109 6,586 3,073 5,964 6,897 4,930
MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Enrollment And Demand Medians

Enrollment is showing signs of recovery

Fall 2022 saw an uptick in enrollment across most rating categories, indicating an enrollment recovery from the initial impact of the pandemic and amid persisting demographic pressures across the country. Despite these pressures, community colleges we rate 'AAA' experienced stable enrollment, and those we rate 'AA+' and 'AA' experienced an increase in enrollment of 2.0% and 3.5%, respectively. This represents the solid demand for these schools and their ability to draw from a wider student population, compared with the more narrow demand profile of some lower-rated institutions. Community colleges we rate 'AA-' and 'A+' experienced a 6% and 2% drop, respectively. These declines are mostly tied to more intense demographic challenges compared with those of peers across the rating distribution. Community colleges we rate 'A' and 'A-' remained essentially flat, while those we rated 'BBB+' and 'BBB' saw an increase of 6.4% and 6.7%, respectively. Given that we only rate three colleges in the 'BBB' category, it's difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the improvement. Fall 2023 enrollment data indicate that enrollment was up by over 3% and continues to recover, and preliminary fall 24 enrollment data show more of the same.

image

Chart 2

image

Financial Medians

Relatively consistent margins despite exhaustion of pandemic relief as major revenue sources increase

Most community colleges entered fiscal 2023 expecting softer financial performance given that most federal relief funds were already spent, and expenses were increasing due to inflation. Still, most community colleges fared similarly to previous years because they experienced increases in state aid funding, student-generated revenues, and property taxes. In most states, community colleges levy a property tax millage to support operating revenues, and the portion of the budget composed of property tax revenues can vary from less than 5% to over 30%, with a median reliance across our rated sector of 30%. We view property tax base support as a stabilizing credit factor, particularly the larger the proportionate share of the budget, because it limits the portion of revenues subject to fluctuations in enrollment and tuition revenues. Still, smaller community colleges will still require tight expense controls in parts of the U.S. with unfavorable demographic trends.

Chart 3

image

Regional Breakout And Medians For Top Three States

Nearly two-thirds of our rated community colleges are located in three states: California (34%), Texas (18%), and Illinois (11%). Below, we've highlighted some key credit characteristics for these states given that they make up the majority of our rated universe in this sector.

California

California is the largest community college district system of higher education in the U.S., serving more than 2 million students at 116 colleges. We currently rate 67 California community colleges, which is the highest number in our rated universe. The 'AA' median rating for these California schools is supported by generally large and healthy multicity tax bases, strong state support, and high wealth and income metrics, offset by relatively higher debt metrics compared with the rest of the U.S.

We continue to watch for the impact of enrollment recovery, which has started to show signs of rebounding after several years of declines. However, the state's declining demographic trends will become an increasing challenge, with recent enrollment projections by the California Department of Education indicating that statewide kindergarten to grade 12 enrollment is expected to drop by about 12% through fiscal 2034. In addition, we continue to monitor the full implementation of the student-centered funding formula, which is a more multi-faceted and equity-focused approach to funding. To ease the transition, the original legislation included a hold harmless provision. Beginning in 2025-2026, a district's funding floor will be equal to its 2024-2025 hold harmless funding level or its student-centered funding formula-generated funding level, whichever is higher. This new funding floor is not set to expire, but it is also not adjusted for inflation. Beyond fiscal 2025, a district's funding floor could decrease in real terms as the costs of delivering services rise with inflation. Ultimately, this could lead to budgetary pressure if a district has not planned carefully, and adjusted expenditures given enrollment declines.

Despite California facing a large operating deficit in its fiscal 2025 budget, it was able to shield community colleges from funding cuts through Proposition 98 rainy-day fund reserve withdrawals, deferrals, and funding shifts, delays and borrowings. As a whole, California community colleges have built up their reserves and liquidity positions to levels stronger than that of past recessionary environments, which we believe is important given the state's volatile revenues.

Texas

Texas is home to the second-highest number of community colleges in our rated universe at 35. Their median rating of 'AA-' is supported by tenured and experienced management teams and material property tax support, coupled with steady state funding in recent years. Through House Bill 8 (HB 8), the Texas Legislature recently passed legislation redefining how state appropriations are awarded, putting a greater emphasis on workforce development programs. We believe that HB 8 allows community colleges to work more effectively and efficiently with local employers, universities, and other community partners to connect students with learning tract outcomes that position them to join the workforce or continue their education. Before HB 8, community colleges did not receive state funding for contact hour credits tied exclusively to workforce development programs. Following HB 8, community colleges across Texas will, on average, receive more in state appropriations for programs that align with student career interests, as well as the local development effort of municipalities and employers' desire for a trained workforce across multiple disciplines. These synergies should allow for continued enrollment stabilization if not modest increases in the near term as community colleges receive funding to educate and train students in expanding disciplines such as artificial intelligence, cyber security, health care-related fields, and trades. We will continue to monitor how community college management teams across Texas incorporate additional state funding into their respective strategic plans.

Illinois

With 22 ratings, Illinois has the third-largest number of community colleges we rate. Revenue composition is similar to overall medians, with student dependence at 19%, state funding at 22%, and higher property-tax revenue dependence at 35%. Local tax bases for Illinois districts tend to be stable-to-modestly growing and diverse, providing steady support to budgets. Illinois' credit quality has improved in recent years, as illustrated by the upward movement of the state rating to 'A-' with a stable outlook (in February 2023), from 'BBB-' with a negative outlook (in April 2020). We view this positively for Illinois community colleges because state funding typically makes up approximately 22% of total revenues (ranging from 10%-37% depending on the school), and there is now more state revenue stability than in the past when Illinois experienced a budget impasse. In addition, reserve levels for Illinois districts are typically above average for the sector, which provides stronger financial flexibility. For example, the median ratios for Illinois districts for financial resources to expenses and debt are 118% and 262%, respectively, compared with the overall median ratios of 100% and 125%, respectively. Illinois community college districts participate in the State Universities Retirement System, a pension plan that has weaker actuarial assumptions and a poor funded status, but the state makes substantially all required contributions on behalf of community colleges, limiting exposure to pension obligations. For more information, see our "Pension Spotlight: Illinois," published June 26, 2023, on RatingsDirect.

Table 3

Fiscal 2023 median ratios for California, Texas, and Illinois
California Texas Illinois
Ratings 68 35 22
Median rating AA AA AA-/A+
Full-time-equivalent (FTE) enrollment (no.) 10,576 2,169 5,996
Service area population (no.) 439,306 143,000 253,900
Net adjusted operating income (%) 7.2 15.7 7.4
State appropriations dependence (%) 28.6 22.3 14.4
Student dependence(%) 6.5 19.0 22.7
Taxes and other local support dependence (%) 23.9 35.7 32.7
Cash and investments to operations (%) 103.1 121.3 91.9
Total cash and investments to total debt (%) 76.8 265.3 122.0
Average age of plant (years) 13.0 15.4 12.1
MADS burden (%) 13.1 9.0 9.2
Total debt per FTE ($) 32,601 11,017 10,307
State appropriations per FTE ($) 6,246 6,432 2,620
MADS--Maximum annual debt service. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

What We're Watching

Enrollment trends:   While community college enrollment has historically been counter cyclical to the economy, with higher demand seen in recessions, this was not apparent during the economic pressures in recent years. However, many community colleges have now begun to see a rebound in demand from the recent low points and are projecting continued growth over the next few years returning to historical levels. We note that, similar to four-year institutions, demand trends remain bifurcated, with larger community colleges benefiting from a broader reach and beneficial corporate and/or higher education partnerships. The National Student Clearinghouse, which tracks community college enrollment across the U.S., has indicated that undergraduate enrollment at community colleges grew 4.7% in spring 2023. Furthermore, community colleges in areas with weakening demographics, such as declining high school population trends, will continue to face heightened enrollment challenges.

State support:  State support remains a major revenue driver for community colleges. According to the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association's annual Grapevine survey, state support (excluding federal relief) for higher education hit $126.5 billion in fiscal 2024, up 10% from fiscal 2023. For fiscal 2024, 41 states reported year-over-year increases in combined state and federal stimulus funding, with 20 states boosting support by more than 10%. We expect that state governments will continue to support public higher education institutions as they navigate tough demand conditions through fiscal 2025. With most of our rated community colleges located in California and Texas, we will continue to monitor closely state funding decisions in these two states and across the country, as well as their impact on community college budgets. We will also continue to monitor how the adoption of state funding models that center more on performance and success factors affects community college operations. For more information, see "With Fiscal 2025 Budget Deadline In Sight, U.S. States Navigate A New Revenue Environment," published June 25, 2024.

Evolving risk management:  Community colleges face risks similar to those of public universities, such as aligning programmatic offerings based on labor market and student demand, the heightening of demographic pressures in certain regions of the country, evolving physical risk primarily tied to geographic location, and rising cyber-security risks. In addition, material turnover among senior management is present across the sector. We will continue to monitor community college enrollment strategies and their effect on enrollment trends, leadership responses, and any potential credit impact related to these risks.

Pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) funding:  Fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2024 year-to-date investment returns have generally been favorable compared with fiscal 2022. As a result, we expect improvement in U.S. public pension funded ratios for fiscal 2024. However, conditions are less visible for fiscal 2025, given uncertainty about monetary policy and the upcoming U.S. presidential election. We will continue to monitor the impact pension and OPEB costs have on community college budgets and senior leadership's ability to execute strategic initiatives to mitigate this risk. For more information on U.S. public pension and OPEB credit characteristics, see " Pension Brief: U.S. Public Pension Funded Ratios Continue Improvement In 2024," July 25, 2024.

Capital investments:   As community colleges implement strategic plans, they grapple with prioritizing deferred maintenance versus new construction. In all cases, senior leadership officials face high construction costs and still higher-than-historical interest rates as they move to implement measures aimed at attracting and retaining students. In addition to traditional classroom needs, we are seeing more recent examples of community colleges considering building or expanding on-campus residence hall options, as housing affordability becomes a broader concern in certain areas. Community colleges able to effectively execute facility improvement strategies will be better positioned to maintain potential positive enrollment momentum than their counterparts that cannot navigate project cost barriers. We believe a combination of prudent liquidity policies and practices, coupled with an ability to secure grants or special gifts, will be key characteristics of community colleges that are successful in this challenging construction environment.

Property tax revenue support:  Community colleges continue to receive a material portion of their total revenues from property taxes at nearly 30% across the sector. Property values have demonstrated resilience in previous economic cycles, with the exception of those community college district service areas that were more concentrated in traditionally volatile sectors. S&P Global Ratings will continue to monitor trends related to property values as well as legislative changes that could potentially affect how community colleges collect property taxes, given they make up a significant portion of the revenue basis for community colleges and any major changes could affect budgets.

Table 4

U.S. community colleges--ratings list
As of Aug. 15, 2024
This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of Aug. 15, 2024. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, lease visit www.standardandpoors.com.
Institution State Outlook
AAA
Alamo Community College District TX Stable
Collin County Community College District TX Stable
Dallas County Community College District TX Stable
Foothill-De Anza Community College District CA Stable
Johnson County Community College KS Stable
Lone Star College System TX Stable
Madison Area Technical College District WI Stable
Maricopa County Community College District AZ Stable
Marin Community College District CA Stable
Miracosta Community College District CA Stable
San Diego Community College District CA Stable
San Mateo County Community College District CA Stable
Tarrant County College District TX Stable
West Valley Mission Community College District CA Stable
AA+
Amarillo Junior College District TX Stable
Austin Community College District TX Stable
Central New Mexico Community College NM Stable
Coast Community College District CA Stable
Contra Costa Community College District CA Stable
Cuyahoga Community College District OH Stable
DeWitt, Ford County's Etc. Community College District No. 540 IL Stable
DuPage County Community College District No. 502 IL Stable
El Camino Community College District CA Stable
El Paso County Community College District TX Stable
Grand Rapids Community College District MI Stable
Greenville Technical College SC Stable
Houston Community College System TX Stable
Ivy Tech Community College Trustees (FKA Indiana Vocational Tech College) IN Stable
Lake Michigan College District MI Stable
Los Angeles Community College District CA Stable
Los Rios Community College District CA Stable
North Orange County Community College District CA Stable
Ohlone Community College District CA Stable
Omaha Metro Community College NE Stable
Pasadena Area Community College District CA Stable
Illinois Central College etc. Community College District No. 514 IL Stable
Portland Community College District OR Stable
San Jacinto Community College District TX Stable
San Jose-Evergreen Community College District CA Stable
Santa Barbara Community College District CA Stable
Santa Monica Community College District CA Stable
Sierra Joint Community College District CA Stable
St. Louis County Junior College District MO Stable
Tyler Junior College District TX Stable
Ventura County Community College District CA Stable
Western Technical College District WI Stable
AA
Allan Hancock Joint Community College District CA Stable
Antelope Valley Community College District CA Stable
Butte-Glenn Community College District CA Stable
Cabrillo Community College District CA Stable
Central Oregon Community College District OR Stable
Cerritos Community College District CA Stable
Chabot-Las Positas Community College District CA Stable
Chaffey Community College District CA Stable
Citrus Community College District CA Stable
Clackamas County Community College District OR Stable
Columbus State Community College District OH Stable
Del Mar College District TX Stable
Desert Community College District CA Stable
Galveston Community College District TX Stable
Gavilan Joint Community College District CA Stable
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District CA Stable
Hartnell Community College District CA Stable
Jefferson County Community College MO Stable
Kirkwood Community College IA Stable
Lake Tahoe Community College District CA Stable
Lansing Community College District MI Stable
Laramie County Community College District WY Stable
Laredo Community College District TX Stable
Lee College District TX Stable
Long Beach Community College District CA Stable
McLennan County Junior College District TX Stable
Midland College District TX Stable
Monterey Peninsula Community College District CA Stable
Mount San Antonio Community College District CA Stable
Mt. San Jacinto Community College District CA Stable
Northwestern Michigan College MI Negative
Odessa Junior College District TX Stable
Ozarks Tech Community College MO Stable
Palomar Community College District CA Stable
Parker County Junior College District (Weatherford) TX Stable
Parkland College District No. 505 IL Stable
Rancho Santiago Community College District CA Stable
Riverside Community College District CA Stable
San Bernardino Community College District CA Stable
San Luis Obispo County Community College District CA Stable
Santa Clarita Community College District CA Stable
Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District CA Stable
Solano County Community College District CA Stable
Sonoma County Junior College District CA Stable
South Texas Community College TX Stable
Southeast Community College NE Stable
Southwestern Michigan College MI Stable
State Center Community College District CA Stable
Texas Southmost College District TX Stable
Victor Valley Community College District CA Stable
Victoria County Junior College District TX Stable
AA-
Angelina County Junior College District TX Stable
Black Hawk Community College District No. 503 IL Stable
Blue Mountain Community College District OR Stable
Brazosport Junior College District TX Stable
Chemeketa Community College District OR Stable
College of the Mainland TX Stable
Compton Community College District CA Stable
Cook County Community College District No. 527 (Morton) IL Stable
East Central Missouri Junior College MO Stable
Florida College System FL Stable
Glendale Community College District CA Stable
Highland Community College District No. 519 IL Stable
Howard County Junior College District TX Stable
Kankakee Will Grundy Livingston Etc. Community College District No. 520 IL Stable
Kansas City Kansas Community College KS Stable
Kellogg Community College MI Stable
Kern Community College District CA Stable
Kern Community College School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 (SFID 1) CA Stable
Kirtland Community College District MI Stable
Kishwaukee Community College District No. 523 IL Stable
Klamath Community College District OR Stable
Linn-Benton Community College District OR Stable
Montcalm Community College MI Stable
Muskegon Community College MI Stable
Napa Valley Community College District CA Stable
North Central Texas College TX Stable
Northeast Community College District NE Stable
Northwest Arkansas Community College District AR Stable
Oklahoma City Community College OK Stable
Panola County Junior College TX Stable
Peralta Community College District CA Stable
Pinal County Community College District AZ Stable
Rio Hondo Community College District CA Stable
Rose State College Technical Area Education District OK Stable
Sauk Valley Community College No. 506 IL Stable
Southwestern Community College District CA Stable
St. Clair County Community College MI Stable
Temple Junior College District TX Stable
Tillamook Bay Community College OR Stable
Washington County Junior College District TX Stable
Western Texas College (Scurry County Junior College District) TX Stable
Winnebago Ogle Boone Etc. Counties Community College District No. 511 IL Stable
Yosemite Community College District CA Stable
Yuba Community College District CA Stable
Yuma/La Paz Counties Community College District AZ Stable
A+
Arkansas State University Mid-South (FKA Crittenden County Community College District) AR Stable
Barton County Community College KS Stable
Butler County Community College KS Stable
Casper Community College WY Stable
Charles Stewart Mott Community College MI Stable
Clarendon College District TX Stable
Colby Community College KS Stable
Coles Christian etc. Counties Community College District No 517 Lake Land IL Stable
College of the Sequoias Community College District CA Stable
Cook County Community College 510 IL Stable
Copper Mountain Community College District CA Stable
Cowley Community College KS Stable
Crowder College MO Stable
Dodge City Community College KS Stable
Fort Scott Community College KS Stable
Fulton Mason Knox Schuyler & Mc Donough Community College District No. 534 IL Stable
Garden City Community College KS Stable
Hutchinson Community College KS Stable
Imperial Community College District CA Stable
Jefferson, Franklin, Perry, Hamilton, Wayne, White, Williamson & Washington Counties Community College District No. 521 IL Stable
Knox Warren Henderson Counties etc. Community College District No. 518 IL Positive
Macon Christian Dewitt Etc. Counties Community College District No. 537 Richland IL Stable
Mendocino- Lake Community College District CA Stable
Merced Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 CA Stable
National Park Community College District AR Stable
Pratt Community College KS Stable
Redwoods Community College District CA Stable
San Francisco Community College District CA Negative
Seward County Community College KS Stable
Shawnee Community College District No. 531 IL Stable
Siskiyou Joint Community College District CA Stable
Southwestern Oregon Community College District OR Stable
Three Rivers Community College MO Stable
West Hills Community College District CA Stable
West Kern Community College District CA Stable
White Gallatin Saline Counties etc. Community College District No. 533 IL Stable
Williamson, Jackson, etc. Counties Community College District No. 530 IL Stable
A
Bismarck State College ND Stable
Cloud County Community College KS Stable
Coffeyville Community College KS Stable
Delgado Community College LA Stable
Neosho County Community College KS Stable
Northeast Texas Community College District TX Stable
Palo Verde Community College District CA Stable
Pearl River Community College District MS Stable
Ranger College District TX Stable
Southwest Texas Junior College District TX Stable
Treasure Valley Community College OR Stable
A-
Clatsop Community College OR Negative
Harrisburg Area Community College PA Stable
Hinds Community College District MS Stable
Lewis & Clark Community College District No. 536 IL Stable
North Dakota State College of Science ND Stable
Westmoreland County Community College PA Stable
BBB+
Cook County Community College District No. 508 (City Colleges of Chicago) IL Stable
BBB
Dakota College at Bottineau ND Stable
Florence-Darlington Technical College SC Stable

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Brian J Marshall, Dallas + 1 (214) 871 1414;
brian.marshall@spglobal.com
Robert Tu, CFA, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5087;
robert.tu@spglobal.com
Kimberly Barrett, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4446;
Kimberly.Barrett@spglobal.com
Chase C Ashworth, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4289;
chase.ashworth@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Luke J Gildner, Columbia + 1 (303) 721 4124;
luke.gildner@spglobal.com
Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004;
jessica.wood@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Yash Chandak, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Pune

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in