articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241009-chinese-local-governments-brief-the-search-for-alternative-revenues-won-t-be-easy-13279085 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Chinese Local Governments Brief: The Search For Alternative Revenues Won't Be Easy

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Central And Eastern Europe Sovereign Rating Outlook 2025: Now More Complicated

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Sheinbaum's Agenda And Looming Changes In U.S. And Mexico Relations

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Will Argentina's Economic Adjustment Be Different This Time?


Chinese Local Governments Brief: The Search For Alternative Revenues Won't Be Easy

With traditional revenues under strain, local and regional governments (LRGs) in China will step up efforts to source alternative revenues. This will help at the margin but won't fully make up for the slide in traditional revenues such as those from land sales. Hence, funding for discretionary expenditures could be deprioritized--including some capital-intensive projects or fully settling certain payables.

Chart 1

image

What's Happening

Traditional sources of revenue continue to slide for China's local governments.  We estimate that LRGs' taxes dropped by 3.5% year on year from January to August 2024. Land sales plummeted by 25% year on year over the same period. Governments are actively seeking alternative revenues.

Why It Matters

Spending cutbacks could reduce investments, payments and support to SOEs.  

  • As budgets tighten, governments will prioritize critical spending on social welfare, crucial public services, and meeting growing debt-servicing needs.
  • This is given our view that the property downturn will continue to drag on confidence, consumption and overall economic growth. We recently revised down our GDP growth expectations for China to 4.6% for 2024 and 4.3% for 2025.

Delays in revenue recovery could also lengthen the path to better fiscal health and improved debt balances.  

  • Additionally, LRGs have a 2028 deadline to resolve "hidden debt"--LRGs' off-budget debt borne by SOEs. A smaller purse limits their ability to pay down such debt.

What Comes Next

LRGs will continue to seek to monetize different assets such as selling or renting out mining or concession rights or underutilized properties.  

  • As one example, fees and charges rose 27% year on year for Jiangsu province from January to May this year, with most of the increase from paid-use of state assets. On average, fees and charges accounted for about 10% of LRGs' total adjusted revenues as of end 2023.
  • Chongqing municipality raised Chinese renminbi (RMB) 28.8 billion of funds in the first half, mainly from selling and leasing office buildings, parking lots, land plots, obsolete equipment, property operation franchises, and even fund shares. Buyers include asset management companies and SOEs; some private groups are also active in quality-asset transactions.
  • The governments control vast resources. Official figures put the asset size of China's local-government owned SOEs at RMB230 trillion as at end-2022, so even tapping a small portion of this could make a difference.

Increased collection efforts could also help.  

  • For example, property taxes increased by 20% year on year nationwide from January to August, thanks to growing rental taxes following enhanced registration requirements on rental contracts. Likewise, urban land and farmland-use taxes rose 11% and 22%, respectively, due to strengthened collection management.
  • Many LRGs have upgraded their reporting, recording, and reviewing systems for non-tax revenue, as well as intensified collection training for tax personnel. News reports even indicated that some LRGs have requested enterprises to pay back taxes dating to the 1990s. Though we think these are isolated cases and not advocated by the central government, it reflects the extent some governments will go to.

Hurdles stand in the way from tapping LRGs' assets and resources quickly and effectively. We think the alternative sources of revenue will only partially offset the gap. 

  • Concerns include the loss of control of state assets and the risks of corruption. Furthermore, as "better" assets are monetized sooner, it may become harder and harder to find a market for the remaining assets, particularly if they are mostly public service in nature and may not generate sufficient stable cash flows.
  • LRGs have some room to raise revenues but can only do so incrementally as most major taxed items are under central governance. Despite the high growth of several property and land stock related taxes year to date, they accounted for less than 5% of LRGs' tax revenues. The total stock of assets under local SOEs may look big but may not be all that liquid.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Wenyin Huang, Singapore +65 6216 1052;
Wenyin.Huang@spglobal.com
Yunbang Xu, Hong Kong (852) 9860-4469;
yunbang.xu@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Christopher Yip, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3593;
christopher.yip@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in