articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241209-a-review-of-u-s-cmbs-exposure-to-u-s-general-services-administration-s-office-leases-following-presidential-e-13352833.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

A Review Of U.S. CMBS Exposure To U.S. General Services Administration's Office Leases Following Presidential Election

Covered Bonds Uncovered

COMMENTS

2025 U.S. Residential Mortgage And Housing Outlook

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

COMMENTS

Scenario Analysis: Middle-Market CLO Ratings Withstand Stress Scenarios With Modest Downgrades (2024 Update)


A Review Of U.S. CMBS Exposure To U.S. General Services Administration's Office Leases Following Presidential Election

When leasing is the practical answer to meeting federal space needs, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) comes in to identify and lease properties for government workers. This may include buildings, land, antenna sites, etc. With speculation rising about potential federal spending cuts under the incoming Trump administration, S&P Global Ratings looks at the characteristics of the GSA's external office lease portfolio, and reviews the U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market's exposure to it.

GSA External Office Lease Portfolio Characteristics

All told, as of October 2024, the GSA leased roughly 150 million sq. ft. of office space across nearly 7,000 individual leases, with a total cost of approximately $5.5 billion per annum. Over the last decade, the average space per lease remains in a tight range of about 21,000 sq. ft. (see chart 1).

Chart 1

image

GSA's external lease portfolio has been on a steady decline overall since 2015

GSA's external lease portfolio has been on a steady decline overall since 2015 (see table 1). Specifically, while the GSA leases space across the U.S., roughly 31% of their obligations are located across markets in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, down from 34% in 2015, a compound annual growth rate of -2.17%. The GSA's U.S. footprint has declined at a slower rate of -1.13% during the same period, on a compound annual basis. For additional perspective, the GSA's U.S., and D.C./Virginia/Maryland leasing footprints have declined, 1.6%, and 2.12%, respectively, between 2019 and the present, while the GSA's D.C. footprint has declined at an even faster 3.41% rate since 2019.

Table 1

GSA external lease portfolio (MSF)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Oct. 2024
Virginia 22.2 21.4 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.8 20.7 20.2 19.9 18.5
District of Columbia 22.2 21.4 21.3 20.8 20.3 18.6 17.3 17.1 16.6 16.5
Maryland 12.9 12.0 11.4 11.4 11.5 12.0 11.7 12.0 11.0 10.9
Other states 110.0 110.1 110.5 110.0 111.2 110.4 107.9 107.4 103.7 103.5
Total external office space 167.4 164.9 163.9 162.8 163.6 161.7 157.5 156.7 151.1 149.4
GSA--U.S. General Services Administration. MSF--Million square feet. Sources: GSA.gov and S&P Global Ratings.
Terminable space - lease expirations and termination options

In a significant percentage of cases, GSA leases are structured with a termination option prior to the stated expiration date of the lease. Therefore, we can analyze the proportion of space that could conceivably be terminated or not renewed during the incoming administration's term (see table 2).

Table 2

Terminable space
(As of October 2024)
Year Expiring leases (MSF) Terminable leases (MSF) Total (MSF) % of 2024 leased space Cumulative (%)
2024 3.9 0 3.9 2.6 2.6
2025 15.6 4.3 19.9 13.3 15.9
2026 13 5 17.9 12.0 27.9
2027 12.6 4.6 17.2 11.5 39.5
2028 14.1 4.6 18.7 12.5 51.9
MSF--Million square feet. Sources: GSA.gov and S&P Global Ratings.

Thus, we see that over half of the portfolio is available to "roll" through the end of 2028. In dollar terms, the figures are not much different; the cumulative expiring/terminable lease total through the end of 2028 is just under half (approx. 49%) of the current spend.

GSA commercial lease agreements with private lessors

Based on our understanding, the GSA generally enters into a lease obligation with a private real estate lessor, then in turn enter into an occupancy agreement with a government agency who intends on occupying the leased space. While the leases between the GSA and the private lessor may vary in terms, specifically relating to termination rights, the occupancy agreements with the agencies appear to generally provide the occupying agency the right to cancel the agreement with the GSA provided four months' notice, so long as the lease was not designated as non-cancellable by the GSA. While we are not able to quantify the cancellable exposure, it is worthwhile to consider given the below summary of the GSA's notable exposures across the CMBS universe.

U.S. CMBS Exposure

We conducted an analysis to find the U.S. CMBS market's exposure to GSA's external office lease portfolio. Our analysis included a review of loan- and property-level data sourced from Trepp, focusing on office loans across outstanding conduit, single-asset single-borrower (SASB), large loan, and commercial real estate collateral loan obligation (CRE CLO) transactions, and the underlying collateral tenants with respect to government agency leasing exposure. The data set was comprised of 704 transactions across conduit (495 transactions), SASB (140), large loan (17), and CRE CLO (52) (see table 3). In total, the data set included 3,947 unique office loans, of which, we've identified 169 loans, secured by 280 properties, with exposure to one or more government agencies as a top five tenant across the collateral properties. Of the 704 transactions, 142 have been identified as having exposure to government agency tenants, of which 45 are rated by S&P Global Ratings.

We focused on the following government agencies, along with a general GSA filter, to find the exposures: U.S. Postal Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Internal Revenue Service, Customs and Border Patrol, Department of Agriculture, Department of Homeland Security, Food and Drug Administration, Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Federal Bureau of Investigation, among others.

Table 3 shows a breakdown of the GSA office loan exposure by transactions in our review.

Table 3

Transactions with office loan exposure(i)
Transaction type Transaction count (no.) Loan count (no.) Transactions with GSA exposure (no.) Loans with GSA exposure (no.) Properties with GSA exposure (no.) Transactions with GSA exposure - S&PGR rated (no.) Loans with GSA exposure - S&PGR rated (no.) Properties with GSA exposure - S&PGR rated (no.)
Conduit 495 3,512 134 161 229 43 55 60
SASB 140 147 3 3 46 2 2 45
Large loan 17 45 0 0 0 0 0 0
CRE CLO 52 243 5 5 5 0 0 0
Total 704 3,947 142 169 280 45 57 105
(i)U.S. government agency, GSA tenant listed as top five tenant in data set. GSA--U.S. General Services Administration. SASB--Single asset single borrower. CRE CLO--Commercial real estate collateralized loan obligation.

The GSA exposure across active CMBS loans secured partially or entirely by office collateral, as categorized by TREPP, appears to be limited in relative terms across the conduit fusion space, though transaction exposures do vary. We've observed a small number of SASB transactions with notable exposure to the continued performance of the external GSA leases, totaling $1.6 billion in outstanding principal balance (see table 4).

Table 4

Notable SASB transactions with GSA exposure
Trepp deal name Outstanding transaction balance (mil. $) Loan with GSA exposure Market Total transaction loan count (no.) Office loans with GSA tenants (no.) Property count (no.) Properties with GSA exposure (no.) Estimated ALA exposed to GSA leasing (mil. $) GSA ALA exposure relative to transaction balance (%)
gs21ross 691.0 Rosslyn Office Portfolio Arlington, Va. 1.0 1.0 7.0 4.0 170.1 24.6
bb15gtp 660.0 NGP V GSA Portfolio Various (19 states) 1.0 1.0 41.0 41.0 660.0 100.0
cg21909 250.0 909 Third Avenue New York, N.Y. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 250.0 100.0(i)
Totals 1,601.0 3.0 3.0 49.0 46.0 1,080.1 67.5
(i)The U.S. Postal Service occupies 36% of the net leasable area at 909 Third Avenue. SASB--Single asset single borrower. GSA--U.S. General Services Administration. ALA--Allocated loan amount. Sources: Trepp and S&P Global Ratings.
Single-tenant GSA conduit exposure

We observed seven loans secured by six unique office properties across seven conduit transactions whose collateral is occupied by a single GSA tenant. In particular, the Loma Linda property is the most notable loan exposed to single-tenant GSA risk, leased entirely to the Department of Veterans Affairs through May 2036, currently securitized on a pari-passu basis across gs17gs7 and gs17gs8, accounting for 7.8% and 5.2% of their respective transaction balances (see table 5).

Table 5

Notable single-tenant GSA exposure in conduit deals
Trepp deal name Transaction balance (mil.$) Loan name Property balance (mil.$) Property balance (%) Property name Address City, state GSA/gov't agency GSA/gov't agency occupied NRA (%)
gs17gs7 1,025.3 Loma Linda 80.0 7.8 Loma Linda 26001 Redlands Boulevard Loma Linda, Calif. Department of Veteran Affairs (327,614 sq. ft.; LXD: 5/26/2036) 100.0
gs17gs8 917.2 Loma Linda 47.5 5.2 Loma Linda 26001 Redlands Boulevard Loma Linda, Calif. Department of Veteran Affairs (327,614 sq. ft.; LXD: 5/26/2036) 100.0
wf23bn46 720.0 22330 Glenn Drive 26.3 3.7 22330 Glenn Drive 22330 Glenn Drive Sterling, Va. GSA US Customs (167,360 sq. ft.; LXD: 8/16/2031) 100.0
bma23b40 473.8 1220 Echelon Parkway 14.9 3.1 1220 Echelon Parkway 1220 Echelon Parkway Jackson, Mo. GSA (109,819 sq. ft.; LXD: 11/04/2044) 100.0
cs18cx11 781.5 321 East 2nd Street 11.3 1.4 321 East 2nd Street 321 East 2nd Street Los Angeles, Calif. GSA (54,827 sq. ft.; LXD: 12/31/2026) 100.0
bmo235c2 776.9 325 West Side Avenue 9.0 1.2 325 West Side Avenue 325 West Side Avenue Jersey City, N.J. GSA (41,477 sq. ft.; LXD: 3/25/2027) 100.0
bmo23c7 767.4 OPI Portfolio 7.8 1.0 701 Clay Avenue 701 Clay Avenue Waco, Texas GSA - Veterans Benefits Administration (138,608 sq. ft.; LXD: 12/29/2035) 100.0
GSA--U.S. General Services Administration. NRA--Net rentable area. Sources: Trepp and S&P Global Ratings.
Other conduit loans with GSA exposure

We observed 20 loans collateralized by properties leased to one or more GSA tenants that occupied greater than 25% of the net rentable area. The largest exposure across the sample is Constitution Center, currently securitized across five conduit transactions. The Constitution Center property, located at 400 7th Street Southwest, Washington, D.C., is leased to several tenants, including the FHFA and GSA, accounting for 938,550 sq. ft., roughly 66.6% of the net rentable area (see table 6).

Table 6

Conduit loans with GSA tenants accounting for greater than 25.0% of NRA
Trepp deal name Transaction balance (mil.$) Loan name Allocated property balance (mil.$) Transaction balance (%) Property name Address City, state GSA/gov't agency GSA/gov't agency property occupied NRA (%)
com13cr6 230.0 Federal Center Plaza 130.0 56.5 Federal Center Plaza 400 & 500 C Street SW Washington, D.C. GSA (465,839 sq. ft.; LXD: 08/16/2027); GSA (46,821 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/02/2026) 70.7
gs21gsa3 620.8 425 Eye Street 62.4 10.1 425 Eye Street 425 I Street Northwest Washington, D.C. GSA (241,398 sq. ft.; LXD: 06/06/2026); GSA (14,217 sq. ft.; LXD: 08/07/2037) 68.2
ba22bn42 758.9 Constitution Center 76.0 10.0 Constitution Center 400 7th Street Southwest Washington, D.C. FHFA (377,092 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/31/2027); GSA (375,260 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/29/2024); GSA (186,198 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/31/2037) 66.6
ms22l8 681.1 Constitution Center 68.0 10.0 Constitution Center 400 7th Street Southwest Washington, D.C. FHFA (377,092 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/31/2027); GSA (375,260 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/29/2024); GSA (186,198 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/31/2037) 66.6
ms22bn41 1,164.5 Constitution Center 110.0 9.4 Constitution Center 400 7th Street Southwest Washington, D.C. FHFA (377,092 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/31/2027); GSA (375,260 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/29/2024); GSA (186,198 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/31/2037) 66.6
db23five 697.2 Sentinel Square II 64.0 9.2 Sentinel Square II 1050 1st Street Northeast Washington, D.C. GSA -Federal Office Election Commission (99,677 sq. ft.; LXD: 11/30/2027) 35.1
jpm19co5 656.1 Brooklyn Renaissance Plaza 58.9 9.0 Brooklyn Renaissance Plaza 335 Adams Street Brooklyn, N.Y. GSA-Secret Service (89,030 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/31/2044) 30.8
bma24v7 821.9 Sunroad Centrum 70.0 8.5 Sunroad Centrum 8620 Spectrum Center Boulevard San Diego, Calif. GSA (120,209 sq. ft.; LXD: 06/27/2039) 43.8
cf19cf3 764.0 Parklawn Building 60.8 8.0 Parklawn Building 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, Md. GSA (935,386 sq. ft.; LXD: 07/31/2030) 72.9
wf22bn43 1,082.2 Constitution Center 84.0 7.8 Constitution Center 400 7th Street Southwest Washington, D.C. FHFA (377,092 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/31/2027); GSA (375,260 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/29/2024); GSA (186,198 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/31/2037) 66.6
cs16c6 520.7 Mission Ridge 35.5 6.8 Mission Ridge 15020 & 15030 Conference Center Drive Chantilly, Va. GSA-FBI (175,000 sq. ft.; LXD: 05/16/2043) 56.3
ms22bn44 1,021.3 Constitution Center 60.0 5.9 Constitution Center 400 7th Street Southwest Washington, D.C. FHFA (377,092 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/31/2027); GSA (375,260 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/29/2024); GSA (186,198 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/31/2037) 66.6
gs18gs10 853.5 Commonwealth Centre 49.0 5.7 Commonwealth Centre 14370 & 14360 Newbrook Drive Chantilly, Va. GSA (95,530 sq. ft.; LXD: 11/14/2026) 30.2
ba21bn33 998.4 909 Third Avenue 50.0 5.0 909 Third Avenue 909 Third Avenue New York, N.Y. United States Postal Service (492,375 sq. ft.; LXD: 10/10/2028) 36.5
ms21l7 911.6 Havenwood Office Park 43.7 4.8 Havenwood Office Park 25700 Interstate 45 Spring, Texas GSA (60,942 sq. ft.; LXD: 06/23/2036) 25.4
wf14lc14 113.4 South Park Office Center 5.4 4.4 South Park Office Center 3518 Westgate Drive Durham, N.C. Department of Veterans (15,340 sq. ft.; LXD: 03/31/2027) 25.3
jpm17jp5 763.8 Centre Market Building 33.7 4.4 Centre Market Building 1100 Raymond Boulevard Newark, N.J. U.S. Customs & Border Protection (123,000 sq. ft.; LXD: 08/30/2035); DEA (89,469 sq. ft.; LXD: 06/30/2028); Social Security Administration (25,412 sq. ft.; LXD: 09/30/2028); U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) (13,498 sq. ft.; LXD: 08/30/2035) 64.8
bma21b30 945.6 1100 & 820 First Street NE 39.0 4.1 1100 First Street NE 1100 First Street Northeast Washington, D.C. GSA -Department Veterans Affairs (131,454 sq. ft.; LXD: 06/25/2024); GSA - FERC (30,193 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/20/2025) 46.3
bma21b26 981.4 1625 & 1747 North Market 39.1 4.0 1625 & 1747 North Market 1625 & 1747 North Market Boulevard Sacramento, Calif. Veterans Admin (206,709 sq. ft.; LXD: 08/31/2029); Veterans Admin (62,821 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/28/2030); Veterans Admin (20,341 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/28/2030); Veterans Admin (12,793 sq. ft.; LXD: 12/31/2027); Veterans Admin (5,575 sq. ft.; LXD: 02/28/2030 97.7
bb22c14 907.4 1100 & 820 First Street NE 36.0 4.0 1100 First Street NE 1100 First Street Northeast Washington, D.C. GSA -Department Veterans Affairs (131,454 sq. ft.; LXD: 06/25/2024); GSA - FERC (30,193 sq. ft.; LXD: 01/20/2025) 46.3
GSA--U.S. General Services Administration. NRA--Net rentable area. Sources: Trepp and S&P Global Ratings.

Worth Keeping An Eye On…

With many office markets grappling with higher vacancies, we believe this corner of the market is worth keeping an eye on, as potential spending cuts on leases could work to reduce demand and increase availability, exacerbating the challenges already facing the office sector.

The Washington D.C. office market stands out given its challenged market metrics--reporting vacancy and availability rates for 3-5 star office properties of 18.7%, and 22.2%, as of December 2024, according to CoStar--and its exposure to the GSA. The below excerpts from the GSA's fiscal year 2025 Congressional Justification for the Federal Buildings Fund document indicate increased likelihood of continued right-sizing of government-leased space, with the possibility of acceleration under the new administration.

  • "The budget request proposes sound, cost-effective investments to address the growing backlog of critical building life-safety and infrastructure needs, enhance federal facilities climate posture and resiliency, reduce the costs of maintaining federally owned facilities, and reduce the government's reliance on costly leases. It also positions the GSA to respond to this historic opportunity to right-size the federal footprint, reduce long-term real estate costs, and meet future workspace needs of Federal agencies and the public they serve."
  • "Modernizing federally owned facilities will enable GSA to consolidate and reduce the federal government's heavy reliance on space leased from private lessors, which will provide cost avoidance many times over."
  • "GSA and occupant agency alignment around the opportunity to transform GSA's current real estate portfolio into one that is high performing, more efficient, and physically smaller than today's portfolio has never been better, with the opportunity to generate substantial savings to the taxpayers. Increased workplace flexibility, taken together with the fact that approximately 80 million rentable square feet of leased space is expiring in the next five years, illustrate how this budget request and others in the near future will determine the makeup, condition, size, and functionality of tomorrow's portfolio of properties."

We will continue to monitor the incoming Administration's rollout of its policies and the impact on rated CMBS transactions.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Jarrett Murphy, New York + 1 (212) 438 1164;
jarrett.murphy@spglobal.com
Research Contact:James M Manzi, CFA, Washington D.C. + 1 (202) 383 2028;
james.manzi@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.