This report does not constitute a rating action.
Asia-Pacific's sustainable bond market is poised to rebound. S&P Global Ratings anticipates record-high issuance of US$260 billion in 2025 through catalysts that include:
- Lower interest rates;
- Refinancing and dynamic local-currency debt capital markets;
- Regulatory reassurance on instruments' claims; and,
- Increasing participation of sovereign and government-linked entities.
Conversely, economic uncertainty, evolving trade policies, and geopolitical tensions may still weigh on issuance, as slower global demand hits growth in the region.
Chart 1
Trends In 2024
- Asia-Pacific sustainable bond issuance totaled US$246 billion, similar to 2023.
- Japan, South Korea, and China remained the largest markets, accounting for three-quarters of regional issuance.
- Issuers prefer local-currency bonds, which accounted for over 90% of issuance; this will likely persist as foreign currency issuance remains about 150 basis points (bps) more expensive.
- Green bonds will continue dominating issuance, despite growth in transition bonds.
- A 2025 rebound in total issuance could be underpinned by lower interest rates, refinancing needs, and governments' economic and sustainability agendas.
Chart 2
Chart 3
Public Sector Issuers To Remain Most Active
- Sovereign issuance grew 71% to a record US$40 billion in 2024.
- Sovereign transaction numbers rose 23%; the average issuance amount rose 39%.
- Sovereign issuers represent 17% of total issuance volume, led by Japan's transition bond agenda.
- Other sovereigns continue to prioritize green bonds.
- Financial institution issuance dropped 21% and may not rebound due to economic uncertainty and market volatility, especially in China.
Chart 4
Chart 5
Japan
- Japan became Asia-Pacific's largest labelled bond market, with US$63 billion in issuance (26% of regional figure).
- The government issued ¥2.6 trillion (US$17 billion) in transition bonds to accelerate decarbonization financing and spur ¥150 trillion of investment in the next decade.
- Government issuance of a further ¥950 billion is scheduled this year.
- Aligning with the country's Green Transformation Promotion Strategy, transition financing will focus on energy and fuel conversion, and renewables.
- Nonfinancial corporates issued close to US$3 billion in transition bonds.
Chart 6
Chart 7
South Korea
- Sustainable bond issuance reached US$60 billion, despite an 18% drop.
- Social bonds will remain the main driver.
- The 20% fall in social bonds issuance reflected a sluggish property market amid high borrowing costs and challenging corporate conditions.
- Korea Housing Finance Corp. (KHFC) will remain an active issuer of social bonds, given its critical public policy role and government plans to supply 236,000 affordable housing units by 2029.
Chart 8
Chart 9
China
- Decline in issuance has slowed; volume dropped 3% to US$55 billion in 2024, following a 29% fall in 2023.
- Issuance from nonfinancials increased fivefold to US$21 billion, driven by sectors focusing on renewable capacity and decarbonization technologies.
- With less lending to corporates, financial institution issuance dropped 44% to US$29 billion.
- Local currency remains dominant, given the cost advantage.
- With local investors driving demand for green bonds, adherence to rules on green finance has increased.
Chart 10
Chart 11
Australia
- Sustainable bond issuance increased almost 72% to US$19 billion, accounting for 8% of regional volumes.
- The federal government entered the market, with US$5 billion in green bonds (26% of volume), driving growth and providing a pricing benchmark for labelled instruments.
- Proceeds will fund infrastructure needs, driven by changing demographics.
- Easing of interest rates by the reserve bank could spur momentum.
- The 2025 election could test government and regulatory support for sustainable policies.
Chart 12
Chart 13
India
- The positive trend continues, with issuance up 30% to US$7 billion.
- The government could raise INR320 billion (US$3.8 billion) through sovereign green bonds by March 2025.
- Social bonds gained traction with financial, and housing and auto finance sectors, as financial inclusion increases.
- Investment in renewables and corporate sustainability goals support green and sustainability-linked instruments.
- A lack of incentives and a more distant net zero target of 2070 could slow growth in sustainable bond issuance.
Chart 14
Southeast Asia
- Volume grew by 36% to US$11 billion, but issuance remains comparatively small.
- The Philippines and Thailand are the most active markets (78% of the total), driven by a surge in sovereign issuances.
- Indonesia and Malaysia saw declines, despite strong positions in sustainable sukuk markets. Both have seen limited issuance of social and sustainability bonds.
- Governments are essential market participants, accounting for 79% of volume in Indonesia. Financial institutions are also active issuers.
Chart 15
Chart 16
What To Watch In 2025
The adoption of International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards will significantly change reporting practices.
Australia: Companies with annual revenue above A$500 million must report mandatory climate disclosures starting January 2025 (above A$200 million from July 2026).
Sri Lanka: Largest 100 listed companies must report under ISSB standards starting January 2025.
Malaysia: ISSB standards for listed companies (capitalization of MYR2 billion) to be phased in between 2025 and 2027.
Singapore: Mandatory standards for listed companies to be phased in between fiscal 2025 and 2027, and for large unlisted companies (annual revenue above S$1 billion and total assets above S$500 million) from fiscal 2027 to 2029.
Hong Kong: ISSB standards effective from August 2025; issuers on the Hang Seng Composite Large Cap must disclose climate-related risks from January 2026.
South Korea: Sustainability disclosure standards drafted in 2024; Climate disclosures to be mandated by 2026.
Philippines: Publicly listed companies and commercial banks to begin collecting data for sustainability-related disclosures in 2025; large corporations (revenue above PHP10 billion-15 billion) and other banks to start mandatory reporting in 2027.
Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) becomes effective in 2025, likely influencing reporting standards for Asia-Pacific companies with European links.
Asia-Pacific remains active in launching and updating taxonomies to guide fund providers.
- 2024 saw the launch of ASEAN Taxonomy V3, the Indonesia Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (TKBI), and Hong Kong's taxonomy for sustainable finance, enhancing alignment, expanding sector coverage, and improving transparency.
- 2025 will see the release of Australia's sustainable finance taxonomy and the expansion of Thailand's Taxonomy Phase 2.
Table 1
Table 2
Largest 2024 Asia-Pacific sustainable bond issuances | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer name | Country | bond type | Amount (mil. US$) | Issuer type | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Japan | Transition bond | 5,329 | Sovereign | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Japan | Transition bond | 5,311 | Sovereign | ||||||
Australian Government | Australia | Green bond | 4,664 | Sovereign | ||||||
China Construction Bank | China | Green bond | 2,808 | Financial Institution | ||||||
China CITIC Bank | China | Green bond | 2,801 | Financial Institution | ||||||
ICBC | China | Green bond | 2,751 | Financial Institution | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Japan | Transition bond | 2,333 | Sovereign | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Japan | Transition bond | 2,229 | Sovereign | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Japan | Transition bond | 2,227 | Sovereign | ||||||
Republic of Singapore | Singapore | Green bond | 1,857 | Sovereign | ||||||
Queensland Treasury Corp. | Australia | Green bond | 1,811 | Municipal | ||||||
China Development Bank | China | Green bond | 1,675 | Financial Institution | ||||||
National Australia Bank | Australia | Green bond | 1,397 | Financial Institution | ||||||
Bank of Jiangsu | China | Green bond | 1,392 | Financial Institution | ||||||
Bank of China | China | Green bond | 1,376 | Financial Institution | ||||||
Source: Environmental Finance Bond Database. |
Sustainable Bonds Defined
Sustainable bonds fall into two main categories:
Sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs): Any instrument for which the financial or structural characteristics can vary depending on whether the issuer achieves predefined sustainability objectives.
Use-of-proceeds bonds: Any instrument where net proceeds (or equivalent amount) are exclusively used to finance or refinance, in part or in full, new and/or existing eligible green and/or social projects. The three main subcategories are:
- Green bonds: Instruments that raise funds for projects with environmental benefits including renewable energy, green buildings, and sustainable agriculture. This includes blue bonds, which raise funds to support the sustainable use of maritime resources and promote related sustainable economic activities.
- Social bonds: Instruments that raise funds for projects addressing or mitigating a specific social issue and/or seeking to achieve positive social outcomes, such as improving food security and access to education, health care, and financing, especially but not exclusively for target populations.
- Sustainability bonds: Instruments that raise funds for projects with both environmental and social benefits.
Transition bonds can be either sustainability-linked or use-of-proceeds bonds issued specifically to support climate transition goals, geared toward issuers in hard-to-abate sectors. Projects these bonds support may not always be "green" but still aim to support climate transition.
Saily Balasubramanian, senior research analyst at GAC in Mumbai, contributed to this report.
S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).
Primary Contact: | Shirley Lui, Hong Kong 85293868015; shirley.lui@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Bertrand P Jabouley, CFA, Singapore + 65 6239 6303; bertrand.jabouley@spglobal.com |
Xavier Jean, Singapore + 65 6239 6346; xavier.jean@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.