This report does not constitute a rating action.
Key Takeaways
- Green bonds will continue to dominate issuance, with transition and sustainability-linked bonds potentially helping to push total sustainable bond issuance to $1 trillion this year.
- More than $900 billion of rated outstanding sustainable bonds mature in the next two years and nearly $2.5 trillion before the end of the decade, testing market participants' commitment to climate action and the strength of the sustainable bond market.
- Efforts to close the climate finance gap in lower-income countries, a rebound of sustainability-linked issuance, a broader base of transition bond issuers, or expanding issuance in China could be swing factors for 2025 volumes.
S&P Global Ratings expects global sustainable bond issuance to remain solid in 2025 (see chart 1). We estimate total issuance will reach $1 trillion. There are several key drivers we anticipate will affect issuance throughout 2025. The data below provides a more in-depth look into our sustainable bond outlook forecast. For more of our analysis, see "Global Sustainable Bond Issuance To Hold Steady At $1 Trillion In 2025", published Feb. 5, 2025.
Key Drivers For 2025
Diversification
- Supranational and lower-income country issuers will make efforts to address the climate finance gap through tools such as blended finance.
- The emergence of a wider range of sustainable bonds, including nature financing, green sukuk, blue bonds, and a pickup in sustainability-linked bonds may support issuance.
Macroeconomic and political trends
- Rising upcoming maturities will test the strength of the sustainable bond market.
- Financial sector issuers' commitment to facilitating decarbonization objectives is uncertain.
Transparency and disclosure
- Issuers and standard-setters may provide more clarity on the different types and applications of transition finance.
- We expect more robust and transparent allocation and impact reporting may help demonstrate the effectiveness of past issuance.
Chart 1
We expect the share of sustainable bonds will remain stable above 10% in 2025.
- Global conventional bond issuance rose 21% in 2024, while sustainable bond issuance remained broadly flat.
- We anticipate sustainable bond issuance growth will match traditional bond growth in 2025, growing by about 3%.
- Falling interest rates may boost both sustainable and conventional bond issuance, while rising investment targets for climate change and sustainable development could enhance sustainable bond issuance.
- We see potential hurdles to issuances in 2025, including uncertainty about political support and the financial sector's commitment to helping advance decarbonization objectives.
Chart 2
Europe and Asia-Pacific maintain their dominance
- In Europe, decarbonization efforts by the largest sovereigns and utilities are likely to continue underpinning overall issuance volumes.
- The EU Taxonomy's efforts to delineate "green-enabling" activities from transitional activities are noteworthy. These definitions can serve as valuable guidance for issuers looking to finance transition projects.
- In Asia-Pacific, governments and their related entities may support issuance in China, South Korea, and Japan. Favorable interest rates, alongside national economic and sustainability agendas, may fuel issuance growth in the region.
- Japan has shown itself to be the global leader for transition bonds and we expect other issuers in the region may follow suit as they look to decarbonize their economies.
Chart 3
Chart 4
Sovereigns and public finance issuers continue to increase their share.
- Issuance by public finance entities, nonfinancial corporates, and sovereigns remained stable in 2024 and we don't expect significant increases in 2025.
- We anticipate limited growth in the financial services sector's sustainable bond issuance in 2025 after a 6% drop in 2024. However, regulatory developments and new sustainability frameworks may encourage some financial institutions to issue more sustainable bonds.
- We expect sovereign sustainable issuance to remain steady or decrease slightly, despite favorable conditions.
Chart 5
Chart 6
Supranational issuance grows, while high-income countries continue to represent 75% of total sustainable issuance.
- Supranational issuance grew nearly 40%, with support from record totals of green and sustainability bonds.
- Issuance from lower-middle income (LMI) countries soared in 2024, nearly doubling to $17 billion, but still constituting only 1.7% of total volumes.
- Issuance from emerging market nations fell 2% in 2024, and issuers from low-income countries account for less than $1 billion in total value.
- Financial institutions issue a higher proportion of bonds in LMI and low-income (LI) countries than in upper-middle income (UMI) and high-income (HI) countries, perhaps due to their important role of financing the entire economy.
Chart 7
Green Bonds
Chart 8
Chart 9
Chart 10
Chart 11
Social Bonds
Chart 12
Chart 13
Chart 14
Chart 15
Sustainability Bonds
Chart 16
Chart 17
Chart 18
Chart 19
SLBs
Chart 20
Chart 21
Chart 22
Chart 23
Transition Bonds
Japanese issuers accounted for 98% of total value
- Transition bond issuance increased more than 500%, reaching a record $20 billion in 2024, on the back of the Government of Japan's multiple issuances.
- Only a single transition bond was issued outside Japan, and the Japanese government accounted for more than 85% of all global transition bond issuance by value.
- Strong issuance totals may continue in 2025 as the private sector begins participating in the market, aligning with published transition pathways for hard-to-abate industries
Chart 24
Nine countries saw debut issuances in 2024
- Most debut issuances came from financial institutions, with a diversity of green, social, and sustainability bonds.
- The Government of the Republic of Honduras issued the country's first sustainable bond, in line with the Latin American trend of sovereigns setting the tone for the market.
- Debut issuances from entities in LI countries accounted for more than 95% of total issuance from those countries.
Table 1
Debut sustainable bonds from a range of issuers in developing countries | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income level | Country of issuance | Mil. $ | Issuer type (number of issuances) | Bond type | ||||||
LI | Madagascar | 38 | Financial services (1) | Sustainability bond | ||||||
Sudan | 543 | Financial services (1) | Social bond | |||||||
LMI | Honduras | 700 | Sovereign (1) | Sustainability bond | ||||||
Sri Lanka | 8 | Financial services (1) | Green bond | |||||||
Tajikistan | 10 | Financial services (1) | Green bond | |||||||
UMI | Botswana | 14 | Financial services (1) | Social bond | ||||||
El Salvador | 80 | Financial services (1) | Social bond | |||||||
HI | Cayman Islands | 550 | Nonfinancials (3) | Green bond | ||||||
Kuwait | 1,000 | Financial services (2) | Green bond | |||||||
Source: Environmental Finance Bond Database, S&P Global Ratings |
Table 2
Largest sustainable bond issuances in 2024 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Label | Country | (Bil. $) | Issuer Type | ||||||
Republic of Italy | Green bond | Italy | 9.7 | Sovereign | ||||||
Republic of France | Green bond | France | 8.8 | Sovereign | ||||||
European Union | Green bond | Supranationals | 7.6 | International public finance | ||||||
European Investment Bank | Green bond | Supranationals | 6.6 | International public finance | ||||||
European Union | Green bond | Supranationals | 5.5 | International public finance | ||||||
European Investment Bank | Green bond | Supranationals | 5.5 | International public finance | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Transition bond | Japan | 5.3 | Sovereign | ||||||
The Government of Japan | Transition bond | Japan | 5.3 | Sovereign | ||||||
IBRD | Sustainability bond | Supranationals | 5 | International public finance | ||||||
IBRD | Sustainability bond | Supranationals | 5 | International public finance | ||||||
Australian Government | Green bond | Australia | 4.7 | Sovereign | ||||||
Cades | Social bond | France | 4.4 | International public finance | ||||||
Cades | Social bond | France | 4.3 | International public finance | ||||||
KfW | Green bond | Germany | 4.3 | International public finance | ||||||
Cades | Social bond | France | 4 | International public finance | ||||||
International Development Association | Sustainability bond | Supranationals | 4 | International public finance | ||||||
European Investment Bank | Green bond | Supranationals | 4 | International public finance | ||||||
United Kingdom | Green bond | United Kingdom | 3.8 | Sovereign | ||||||
United Kingdom | Green bond | United Kingdom | 3.6 | Sovereign | ||||||
IBRD | Sustainability bond | Supranationals | 3.5 | International public finance | ||||||
Source: Environmental Finance Bond Database, S&P Global Ratings |
Table 3
Largest sustainable bond issuers since 2020 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Country | (Bil $) | Issuer Type | |||||
IBRD | Supranationals | 229.9 | International public finance | |||||
European Union | Supranationals | 190.9 | International public finance | |||||
Cades | France | 141.7 | International public finance | |||||
Fannie Mae | United States | 113.7 | Financial services | |||||
Federal Republic of Germany | Germany | 81.1 | Sovereign | |||||
European Investment Bank | Supranationals | 80.1 | International public finance | |||||
Korea Housing Finance Corporation | Korea | 75.1 | International public finance | |||||
United Kingdom | United Kingdom | 72.8 | Sovereign | |||||
KfW | Germany | 66.6 | International public finance | |||||
Republic of France | France | 61.9 | Sovereign | |||||
Republic of Italy | Italy | 52.1 | Sovereign | |||||
Republic of Chile | Chile | 46.8 | Sovereign | |||||
International Development Association | Supranationals | 40.6 | International public finance | |||||
Deutsche Bank | Germany | 39.6 | Financial services | |||||
Inter American Development Bank | Supranationals | 35.6 | International public finance | |||||
Unédic | France | 34.5 | International public finance | |||||
Bank of China | China | 32.9 | Financial services | |||||
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank | Supranationals | 32.3 | International public finance | |||||
Enel | Italy | 30.7 | Nonfinancials | |||||
Republic of Austria | Austria | 29.3 | Sovereign | |||||
Source: Environmental Finance Bond Database, S&P Global Ratings |
Sustainable Bonds Defined
Sustainable bonds fall into two main categories:
Sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs): Any type of instrument for which the financial or structural characteristics can vary depending on whether the issuer achieves predefined sustainability objectives.
Use-of-proceeds bonds: Any type of instrument where the net proceeds (or an equivalent amount to the net proceeds) are exclusively used to finance or refinance, in part or in full, new and/or existing eligible green and/or social projects.
There are three subcategories of use of proceeds instruments, green, social, and sustainability.
- Green bonds: Instruments that raise funds for projects with environmental benefits including renewable energy, green buildings, and sustainable agriculture. This includes blue bonds, which are instruments that raise funds to support the sustainable use of maritime resources and promote related sustainable economic activities.
- Social bonds: Instruments that raise funds for projects that address or mitigate a specific social issue and/or seek to achieve positive social outcomes, such as improving food security and access to education, health care, and financing, especially but not exclusively for target populations.
- Sustainability bonds: Instruments that raise funds for projects with both environmental and social benefits.
Transition bonds can be either sustainability-linked or use-of-proceeds bonds issued specifically to support climate transition goals, geared toward issuers in hard-to-abate sectors. Projects those bonds support may not always be "green" but still aim at supporting climate transition.
Primary Contact: | Bryan Popoola, Washington D.C. +1 202 615 5962; bryan.popoola@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Patrice Cochelin, Paris + 33144207325; patrice.cochelin@spglobal.com |
Azul Ornelas, Mexico City +52 5510375283; azul.ornelas@spglobal.com | |
Emmanuel F Volland, Paris + 33 14 420 6696; emmanuel.volland@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.