articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250305-indian-steelmakers-face-harsher-downside-scenarios-on-u-s-tariff-effect-13429125 content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

Indian Steelmakers Face Harsher Downside Scenarios On U.S.-Tariff Effect

COMMENTS

FAQ: Applying Our Integrated Analytical Approach For Second Party Opinions

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: Second Party Opinions

COMMENTS

U.S. Tariffs Aren't The Main Problem For European Chemical Companies

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


Indian Steelmakers Face Harsher Downside Scenarios On U.S.-Tariff Effect

SINGAPORE (S&P Global Ratings) March 5, 2025--Indian mills may face a glut of imported steel as U.S. tariffs reshape global trade flows in the material. Some offset may come from cheaper coking coal, another likely result of shifting trade barriers. S&P Global Ratings believes the downside risks on steel prices are greater than the likely cost benefits on inputs.

"India's steelmakers are caught up in rising geopolitical and trade tensions, and that's creating more uncertainty in their outlooks," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Anshuman Bharati. "Under our new downside scenarios, leverage would be 45% higher than our base case."

With the U.S. set to impose a 25% tariff on steel imports, effective March 12, 2025, exports to the U.S. are becoming costly, diverting flows to other geographies.

Chart 1

image

"Korea and Japan may divert more exports toward India," said Mr. Bharati, noting that these two countries accounted for 15% of the 26 million tons of steel the U.S. imported in 2024.

India already gets 40% of its steel imports from these two countries and has free-trade agreements with both. At the same time, domestic steel prices in India are also under pressure from cheaper imports from China.

"The higher-import threat comes while India is ramping up about 15 million tons of newly built steel capacity that was added during 2024," said Mr. Bharati. "Sluggish steel prices could delay the full utilization of this capacity and may hinder expansion."

Chart 2

image

Our downside scenario for a price correction is now harsher, at Indian rupee (INR) 3,000 per ton. Under this scenario, the consolidated ratio of debt-to-EBITDA for large Indian steel companies could rise to 3.5x in fiscal year 2026 (year ending March 31). That is significantly higher than our base case of 2.4x.

The Indian steel companies have requested government intervention to protect the domestic steel industry.

"The government previously employed trade protection measures to check the influx of cheaper imports," said Mr. Bharati. "Should similar measures be implemented again, they could insulate domestic producers from international price volatility and safeguard their earnings."

CHEAPER COAL COULD PROVIDE TEMPORARY RELIEF

China's recent tariff hike on U.S. coking coal could offer some relief to Indian steel producers. The 18% tariff will likely create a surplus of U.S.-origin coking coal in the seaborne market. This could lower the prices and improve the profitability of Indian steelmakers, which are the largest buyers of seaborne coking coal.

China imported 10.7 million tons of U.S.-origin coking coal in 2024, representing about 9% of its total coking coal imports. A substantial portion of this volume could now find its way to India, potentially putting downward pressure on prices for Australian-origin cargoes.

On March 5, 2025, S&P Global Ratings revised its coking coal price assumptions for rest of 2025 to US$200 per ton from US$220 per ton (see "S&P Global Ratings Metal Price Assumptions: Holding Firm Through First Waves Of Tariffs," published on RatingsDirect on March 5, 2025). Our price assumptions are also lower than the average price of US$240 per ton in 2024.

A US$20 per ton reduction in coking coal prices from our base case could increase the average EBITDA per ton for Indian steel mills by more than INR1,000, all else equal. Such an improvement could partially offset the hit from falling steel prices caused by a potential increase in imports.

EDITOR'S NOTE

S&P Global Ratings believes there is a high degree of unpredictability around policy implementation by the U.S. administration and possible responses--specifically with regard to tariffs--and the potential effect on economies, supply chains, and credit conditions around the world. As a result, our baseline forecasts carry a significant amount of uncertainty. As situations evolve, we will gauge the macro and credit materiality of potential and actual policy shifts and reassess our guidance accordingly (see our research here: spglobal.com/ratings).

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

The report is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may purchase a copy of the report by sending an e-mail to research_request@spglobal.com. Ratings information can also be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website by using the Ratings search box at www.spglobal.com/ratings.

Primary Credit Analyst:Anshuman Bharati, Singapore +65 6216 1000;
anshuman.bharati@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Minh Hoang, Singapore + 65 6216 1130;
minh.hoang@spglobal.com
Media Contacts:Richard J Noonan, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2152;
richard.noonan@spglobal.com
Ning Ma, Hong Kong (852) 2912-3029;
ning.ma@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in