articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250430-aaam-local-government-investment-pool-trends-first-quarter-2025-13481343 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (First-Quarter 2025)

COMMENTS

China Banking Brief: Added Buffers, Same State Support For Megabanks

COMMENTS

China's Monetary Stimulus Adds Strain For Banks

COMMENTS

European 'AAAm' Money Market Fund Trends (First-Quarter 2025)

COMMENTS

Why Most EMEA Emerging Markets Are Slow To Adopt Bank Recovery And Resolution Plans


'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (First-Quarter 2025)

The 'AAAm' local government investment pool (LGIP) trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk. The LGIPs featured in this report all conform to our principal stability fund ratings (PSFR) criteria.

In our rating analysis, we emphasize the net asset value (NAV) per share, 'A-1+' credit quality, weighted average maturity to reset (WAM-R), weighted average maturity to final (WAM-F), net asset trends, and the underlying composition of LGIPs. For more, see the "'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools" section at the end of this report.

U.S. LGIPs Begin 2025 With Seasonal Inflows

Rated pools experienced typical inflows during the first quarter of this year--mostly because of seasonal tax revenue collections balances invested within these funds--and rated LGIP assets overall rose to $419 billion, a new high. Government LGIPs grew to $109 billion (up 10.3% from the prior quarter), and prime LGIPs increased to $310 billion (up 6.7%).

We expect assets to plateau in the second quarter, since state and local governments' spending patterns may lead to drawdowns, consistent with historical trends.

(Prime LGIPs are those that have the ability to invest in corporate and bank credit securities--similar to prime money market funds.)

Chart 1

image

LGIP Yields Gradually Declined

LGIP yields continued to decline in the first quarter and are roughly 100 basis points (bps) lower than where they were in early 2024. After the Federal Reserve's rate cut in December, government LGIP yields fell to 4.27% (down 14 bps from the prior quarter), and prime LGIP yields fell to 4.41% (down 17 bps from the prior quarter).

Table 1

'AAAm' LGIP seven-day net yield (%)
Index June 2024 September 2024 December 2024 March 2025
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' government LGIPs 5.27 4.99 4.41 4.27
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' prime LGIPs 5.40 5.08 4.58 4.41

NAV Stability

NAV per share averaged 1.000061 in the first quarter of 2025. First-quarter NAV ranges were slightly wider than the fourth-quarter NAV ranges, likely because of reinvestment of inflows and a marginal decrease in the allocation to U.S. Treasuries (which was approximately 4% for prime funds and 2% for government funds). In our view, the NAV resiliency in rated LGIPs signaled that pool managers were emphasizing liquidity and high-quality investments.

Chart 2

image

Market Dynamics And Uncertainty Limit The Extension Of Weighted-Average Maturities

Because of uncertainty about the pace and timing of rate cuts, managers have remained conservative with respect to both WAM and weighted-average life. On average, managers marginally extended WAMs in government funds (by three days, to 39 days) and in prime funds (by two days, to 42 days).

Among other factors, the shape of the yield curve typically influences manager strategy. We view the slightly inverted yield curve, primarily affecting investments of less than one year, as another constraint to extending. The front of the curve currently offers the highest value, especially in the one- to two-month range, which likely explains limited extensions beyond the 40-day mark.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Portfolio Composition

Pools have been cautious in their approach to investment allocation, with minimal change. As mentioned, both prime and government funds have slightly reduced their exposure to U.S. government securities, possibly because of market volatility and rate policy uncertainty. We expect that managers will be strategic with respect to certain government maturities later this year as expectations evolve regarding congressional action related to the debt ceiling. Government funds experienced a small increase in their exposure to repurchase agreements and agency floaters, whereas prime funds increased their allocation to commercial paper.

Economic Updates

The underlying instruments in LGIP portfolios are generally high-credit-quality ('A-1' or higher) U.S. government, U.S. agency, and bank investments (see table 2 and chart 5). Recognizing the impacts of economic conditions on such investments, we cite some of the key takeaways from recent reports: "Credit Conditions North America Q2 2025: Uncertainty Prevails," published March 26, 2025, and "Economic Outlook U.S. Q2 2025: Losing Steam Amid Shifting Policies," published March 25, 2025.

  • S&P Global Ratings economists are forecasting that the Fed's policy rate will fall to 4.00%-4.25% by the end of 2025.
  • We anticipate a likely downshift in GDP growth this year, to a 1.6% quarterly average.
  • We project that inflation will remain closer to 3.00% in 2025 as tariffs increase prices along the domestic supply chain and for end consumers.

Table 2

'AAAm' LGIP 'A-1+' credit quality (%)
Index June 2024 September 2024 December 2024 March 2025
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' government LGIPs 99 99 99 99
S&P Global Ratings 'AAAm' prime LGIPs 63 64 62 62

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Table 3

'AAAm' LGIPs--Top 10 by assets
--Portfolio maturity (days)--
Principal stability fund rating Local government investment pool Net assets (mil. $) WAM-R WAM-F A-1+ credit quality (%) NAV per share
Government LGIPs
AAAm TEXPOOL 38,393 41 96 100 0.99997
AAAm North Carolina Capital Management Trust - Government Portfolio 23,561 39 103 98 1.00014
AAAm New York Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (NY CLASS) 15,237 43 82 100 1.00008
AAAm Texas Short Term Asset Reserve (TexSTAR) Cash Reserve Fund 13,103 38 100 100 1.00006
AAAm Lone Star Investment Pool- Government Overnight Fund 8,083 28 95 96 1.00013
AAAm Pennsylvania School District Liquid Asset Fund - Max Series 2,902 39 62 100 1.00009
AAAm New Jersey Asset & Rebate Management Program/Joint Account 2,051 46 108 100 1.00008
AAAm New York Liquid Asset Fund - MAX Portfolio 1,920 35 35 100 1.00003
AAAm Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS Government) 1,628 17 103 100 1.00006
AAAm Nebraska Liquid Asset Fund 787 46 103 100 1.00007
Prime LGIPs
AAAm Florida PRIME 32,028 48 85 56 1.00003
AAAm Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS) 29,146 47 88 55 1.00005
AAAm State Treasury Asset Reserve of Ohio (STAR OHIO) 26,306 34 64 62 1.00004
AAAm California Asset Management Trust/Cash Reserve Portfolio 20,870 49 86 54 1.00011
AAAm Connecticut State Treasurer's Short-Term Investment Fund 18,993 18 81 79 1.00064
AAAm TEXPOOL Prime 15,844 43 67 51 0.99999
AAAm Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PLUS+) 15,372 45 89 58 1.00002
AAAm Local Government Investment Cooperative 14,347 40 80 53 1.00007
AAAm Virginia Local Government Investment Pool 12,984 37 82 78 1.00001
AAAm Maryland Local Government Investment Pool 11,993 45 45 77 0.99995
WAM-R--Weighted average maturity to reset. WAM-F--Weighted average maturity to final. NAV--Net asset value. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools

LGIPs are present in many U.S. states where, generally, the state treasurer oversees a pooled investment vehicle that operates in a similar way to a money market fund. Typically a cost-effective investment option, LGIPs allow municipalities and public entities to combine their idle cash and operating balances to obtain economies of scale, through a diversified range of investments, to earn an incremental rate of return.

Unlike money market funds registered with the SEC, LGIPs are not regulated by the SEC and therefore not subject to SEC rule 2a-7. However, LGIPs typically benefit from the purview of state statutes, which provide guidelines on LGIPs' investment policy and objective, as well as from the standards and guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, where standard 79 allows the use of amortized cost to value an LGIP's portfolio assets.

Our LGIP metrics demonstrate the investment practices of 'AAAm' rated LGIPs and those conforming to our PSFR criteria. If an individual LGIP's metrics are below our benchmarks, this may indicate a more conservative approach to investment. Metrics well above our benchmarks may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit still within the range for a 'AAAm' PSFR.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Kara Wachsmann, Englewood + 303 721 4547;
kara.wachsmann@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642;
michael.masih@spglobal.com
Andrew Paranthoiene, London + 44 20 7176 8416;
andrew.paranthoiene@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in