This report does not constitute a rating action.
Key Takeaways
- China's internet data centers will be a top beneficiary of the country's hefty investments in AI development.
- The benefits won't land evenly, however. As they expand, the biggest players may push smaller competitors to the margins.
- In our view, any oversupply risks are longer term and relate to restraints on imports of high-processing AI chips.
Build it and they will come. This is the likeliest narrative for the rapid expansion of internet data centers in China. S&P Global Ratings believes the major operators have sufficient demand to warrant their capacity additions. For smaller and less competitive players, however, we see a potential asset bubble.
In our view, the push for AI development in the country's tech sector will significantly increase demand for computing power. Budgets for internet data centers (IDCs) are on the rise for cloud service providers, social media platforms, and other internet service providers. We estimate that Alibaba Group and Tencent Holdings, which are leading this charge, will in total ramp up annual spending in this area to above RMB200 billion (US$28 billion) in 2025-2026, from about RMB50 billion (US$7 billion) in 2023.
This is a significant opportunity for the biggest wholesale IDC operators such as GDS Holdings Ltd., VNET Group Inc., and WinTriX DC Group (familiarly known as Chindata). We anticipate strong revenues as well as enhanced EBITDA and cash flow visibility. The large players have already booked much of the capacity they are now building, and they can meet the service demands of big tech players. The smaller players could get pushed further to the margins.
Chart 1
For Top Players, The New Capacity Will Be Utilized
Chinese enterprises have been increasingly integrating large language models and generative AI into their operations. The success of AI-focused companies such as DeepSeek has accelerated this trend. As a result, we expect tech companies to invest heavily in AI infrastructure, including AI chips, data centers, and talent acquisition for AI software development (see China's DeepSeek Triggers Cycle Of Disruption," published on RatingsDirect on Feb. 10, 2025).
This trend in turn will drive demand for internet data centers. As such, we don't see the major expansion plans as particularly risky. This is because much of this capacity is pre-booked. For example, in a recent earnings call, VNET said it will deliver 400 megawatts (MW)-450MW of additional wholesale IDC capacity in 2025. That's a big jump from the 486MW in service at end-2024. But it has obtained orders for 83% of this capacity.
GDS, as another example, has reported a commitment rate of 91.9% for area in service and a pre-committed rate of 64.1% for area under construction in 2024.
The ability to expand quickly will help the leading players solidify market share (see chart 2). We estimate the new capacity could ramp up as quickly as six months upon delivery, compared with the typical 12-24 months historically, as customers are eager to speed up the integration of large language model and generative AIs into their operations to stay ahead of the AI race.
Chart 2
Strict Requirements Will Rule Out Most Smaller And New Players
We believe hyperscalers--such as Tencent, Alibaba and Huawei Technologies--are looking for wholesale IDC operators that have the capability to rapidly deliver large-scale data centers with low operating costs and high reliability. Key factors include anticipating hyperscale needs through pre-committed land acquisitions in prime locations with sufficient energy and water resources, network connectivity, and near compute demand.
Hyperscalers generally have a long list of operational criteria through service-level agreements (SLAs) with IDC operators. These criteria include guaranteed service uptime, support response and resolution times, performance metrics (such as latency and processing speed), power density and cooling solutions, other facility management metrics (such as security). Violation of SLAs usually results in significant financial penalties for IDC operators.
In addition, the operators need significant liquidity and access to various financing channels to fund the rapid development of new datacenters. These strict requirements rule out most smaller players from securing commitments from hyperscalers, which account for the lion’s share of AI workloads and hence datacenter demand. The smaller operators also lack a track record of building and running large-scale IDCs that they can showcase to the hyperscalers for contract bidding.
Location Is A Deciding Factor
Wholesale IDC demand is uneven across the country. Beijing, Shanghai and the surrounding region host the majority of China’s data center capacity and have the highest utilization rates, often around 70% or above. These cities benefit from close proximity to compute demand and limited access to key resources such as land, electricity, and water, thus reducing the supply of suitable data centers.
Demand in these regions should increase, due to the growth of AI inference workloads. Unlike training large language models, AI inferencing is less resource intensive and requires low latency--i.e., the time it takes for data to travel between server and end-user.
Chart 3
China’s leading IDCs players generally have solid presences in Beijing and other higher demand region. We believe it's challenging for smaller players and newcomers to expand in these areas due to land scarcity and strict energy requirements.
Leading IDCs Typically Have Much Lower Operating Costs
Data centers consume vast amount of electricity. Typically, electricity costs account for at least 40% to 50% of the total operating costs of data centers, with AI datacenters consuming a few times more electricity than traditional datacenters. Improving energy efficiency lowers operating costs for hyperscalers.
Moreover, China regulators are increasing energy efficiency requirements for data centers to reduce their environmental impact and energy consumption. Hyperscalers may also have sustainability goals and net-zero emissions targets that IDC operators will need to meet.
Leading IDC operators typically have much higher energy efficiency ratios relative to other datacenter operators, as measured by the ratio of power usage effectiveness (see chart 4). This is defined as the ratio of the total amount of power entering a data center facility to the power consumed by the IT equipment within it. Using this metric, VNET, GDS, and Chindata consume about 16% less energy than a typical data center in China.
Chart 4
For Smaller Players, There May Be A Supply Glut
Service fees and utilization rates across China have been declining since 2020 due to significant datacenter capacity additions, likely due to favorable government policies to incentivize datacenter construction and a desire to capture the growing AI demand.
However, much of this new supply likely does not meet the needs of major internet firms. Therefore, we are seeing a growing divergence in capacity utilization between the biggest players and the rest of the market (see chart 5). Leading players typically have utilization rates of 70%-75% compared with other datacenter operators that have an average utilization of about 40%-50%, based on our estimation. Moreover, much of the unutilized capacity for leading players are committed, meaning that the utilization rates for completed datacenters will likely exceed 90% within a year.
Chart 5
U.S. Chip Restrictions Remain A Key Risk For IDC Operators
The supply of advanced chips is a key risk for new datacenter demand in China. A lack of advanced chip supply could stifle internet companies’ ability to build out their AI infrastructure and hence reduce their demand for datacenters.
U.S. restrictions on exports of advanced chips to China continue to tighten, with new licensing requirements for Nvidia H20 chips. Such chips were modified specifically to meet previous U.S. export control requirements when exporting to China. Some Chinese firms have increased the use of domestically produced AI chips. However, It remains uncertain whether Chinese AI chip production can meet demand, especially given the limitations on acquiring advanced semiconductor equipment.
Major China tech firms have reportedly significantly increased their stock of H20 chips, limiting the risk on AI demand over the next year. However, chip availability remains a risk beyond that.
Related Research
- Tencent Can Absorb Higher AI Spending, March 24, 2025
- Alibaba To Maintain Strong Cash Amid AI Investments, Feb. 26, 2025
- China's DeepSeek Triggers Cycle Of Disruption, Feb. 10, 2025
Primary Contact: | Aras Poon, Hong Kong 852-2532-8069; aras.poon@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Clifford Waits Kurz, CFA, Hong Kong 852-2533-3534; clifford.kurz@spglobal.com |
Research Assistant: | Jenny Chan, Hong Kong 852-25333570; jenny.chan@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.