articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250516-banks-can-help-not-fix-shandong-s-lgfv-issues-13489406 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Banks Can Help, Not Fix, Shandong's LGFV Issues

COMMENTS

Higher Education Brief: Muted Relief For Australian Universities Post Election

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, April 2025

COMMENTS

Sovereign Brief: UAE's Domestic Debt Capital Market Gains Momentum

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


Banks Can Help, Not Fix, Shandong's LGFV Issues

This report does not constitute a rating action.

A gap is opening among Shandong banks. The lenders with reasonable capital buffers and asset quality are better positioned to support SOEs. However, the province greatly relies on banks in Shandong's rural and economically weaker regions, and these institutions have less capacity to support faltering entities.

Shandong is going through an economic transformation. Local governments in the province encourage banks to lend to state-linked firms in emerging sectors, particularly high-end manufacturing. We believe this will widen the gap between the better capitalized banks in the upper-tier markets, and the banks with moderate capital buffer in Shandong's hinterland.

Shandong's Transition Both Uplifts And Leaves Entities Behind

Banks in the province will likely need to absorb rising bad debt from enterprises, including state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and local government financing vehicles (LGFVs), that have trailed in Shandong's transition. Problematically, they are concentrated in lower-tier markets, where the resources of local governments are thin. Banks are likely to take the hit in the event of a default.

Bank capacity to support Shandong's government-linked entities differs significantly between those in economically developed cities, such as Qingdao and Jinan, and those in less-developed parts of the province.

Rural banks and some city banks in less developed regions may speed up their lending to stimulate the local economy, which could lead to asset quality issues down the road. During economic downturns, their capital and asset quality could deteriorate significantly. They may need the support of local governments.

We look at the sector through a survey of select Shandong-based banks that represent the spectrum of lenders in the province. Specifically, we look at:

  • Bank of Qingdao
  • Qilu Bank
  • Qingdao Rural Commercial Bank
  • Weihai Bank
  • Weifeng Bank

Shandong's Banking Sector At A Glance

Shandong's banking sector features a higher proportion of city and rural banks compared with the national average. These lenders are not as well capitalized as the national banks and are thus less able to absorb credit shocks.

Chart 1

image

The government has tried over the past five years to stabilize asset quality and to enhance the capitalization of Shandong lenders. These efforts include facilitating the disposal of nonperforming assets and establishing debt-resolution committees.

The government has also created a provincial financial commission and has issued special bonds to strengthen the capital positions of some banks.

Table 1

The Shandong government has rolled out meaningful initiatives to address debt
2019  Shandong financial institutions disposed of nonperforming loans totalling RMB284.35 billion during the year. 
Set up 1,103 debt resolution committees in the region.
2020  Shandong financial institutions disposed of nonperforming loans totalling RMB256.68 billion during the year. 
Set up a provincial financial commission and local coordination mechanism.
2021  Issuance of RMB10 billion in government special-purpose bonds to supplement the capital of 12 small and midsized commercial banks in the region.
2022  Promoted small and medium-sized commercial banks to replenish capital through the issuance of perpetual bonds, subordinated capital bonds and other methods.
2023  Issuance of RMB25 billion in government special-purpose bonds to supplement the capital of 40 rural commercial banks.
RMB--Renminbi. Sources: People's Bank of China Shandong branch, S&P Global Ratings.

Shandong banks' asset-quality metrics improved after writing down some nonperforming loans (NPLs) and beefing up provisioning. The province's headline NPL ratio has improved while provision coverage fell to a rate in line with the national average. Additionally, the level of special-mention loans is falling and should align closely with the overall system.

Banks in Shandong that we covered have generally improved their risk recognition and increased transparency in disclosure. Furthermore, they are implementing stricter criteria in asset classification to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Chart 2

image

Asset-Quality Disparities Are Linked To Banks' Business Profiles

Qingdao

Banks operating in Qingdao have maintained relatively stable asset quality after local authorities encouraged lenders to write off hefty volumes of bad loans. The city's strategic coastal location and diverse industrial base have also helped the lenders.

Chart 3

image

Rural banks typically have weaker asset quality due to limited market diversification and less-stringent risk management, making them more susceptible to economic downturns.

Qingdao Rural Commercial Bank's ratio of special-mention loans to total lending is substantially higher than the provincial average and the national average for rural banks. That said, Qingdao Rural Commercial Bank maintains a moderate capital profile with adequate provision coverage. It is unlikely to put a significant burden on the Qingdao government.

Chart 4

image

Outside Qingdao

Banks outside Qingdao, especially in less-developed cities, may impose an additional burden on local governments. These institutions often face a limited customer base, weaker capital and profitability, and heightened asset-quality challenges. This stems from concentration risk and a lack of business diversity.

Qiliu Bank has a stronger credit profile due to its operations in the larger city of Jinan, while Weihai Bank and Weifang Bank contend with weak capital and profitability, higher nonperforming assets and lower provision coverage.

Chart 5

image

Banks Are Using Perpetual Bonds To Restore Regulatory Capital

Shandong banks have been actively tapping the perpetual-bond market since 2020 to strengthen their capitalization. About two-thirds of the perpetual bonds will become callable in 2025 and 2026. We anticipate the banks will likely call the bonds and replace them with perpetual bonds or other additional Tier 1 instruments, to take advantage of low interest rates.

Chart 6

image

Our estimates indicate that our sample banks could boost risk-weighted assets growth by 20%-25% (or RMB65 billion–RMB100 billion) while maintaining a buffer of 50-100 basis points above minimum capital requirements.

Chart 7

image

Pressures remain for Shandong's lower-tier banks. The decline in China's property market, along with economic shifts in Shandong, have affected many enterprises. Shandong's banks will directly feel the effects, supporting corporate transformation while managing exposure to special mention and non-performing loans.

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:Jason Ku, Hong Kong +852 25328067;
jason.ku@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Ryan Tsang, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3532;
ryan.tsang@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Yoyo Yin, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in