articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250609-policy-brief-china-aims-to-put-market-back-at-center-of-economy-13499027 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Policy Brief: China Aims To Put Market Back At Center Of Economy

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: Will Tariffs Total Automakers Credit Quality?

COMMENTS

India Renewables: Doubling Down On Growth

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: The ABC Of BDCs


Policy Brief: China Aims To Put Market Back At Center Of Economy

In an era of heightened tariffs and economic nationalism, China is talking about free markets. Beijing wants to increase market pressures to spur companies toward greater efficiency and innovation. Private firms will be given a freer hand, and highly indebted SOEs that don't make the cut may be allowed to fail.

What's Happening

The central government in late May released "Opinions on Improving the Modern Enterprise System with Chinese Characteristics". We believe the guideline, along with the adoption of the "Private Sector Promotion Law" in April, is part of pattern: Beijing is exposing firms (private and state owned) to greater market rigor.

Why It Matters

Beijing is reaffirming market forces to make businesses more competitive. The steps follow a yearslong initiative to defuse debt risks. Now it's eyeing a more constructive phase, we believe, where entities may not only survive but flourish.

The move may stabilize economic growth amid an increasingly fraught external environment. It is also addressing complaints from offshore governments that Chinese businesses are excessively subsidized to gain unfair advantages. Such misgivings have prompted some countries to impose restrictions on Chinese exports and overseas investments.

We assume Beijing has been encouraged by recent domestic advancement in electric vehicles, chipmaking, AI and clean energy, which have flowed largely from the private sector. The government now aims to replicate that advancement in other sectors, and is seemingly happy to let private firms take the lead.

What Comes Next

Privately owned entities will gain more access to capital markets. The outstanding bonds issued by private firms account for only less than 3.5% of the onshore market. We believe this number will rise.

The measures will change corporate credit profiles, both the stand-alone credit profile (SACP) and the government support likelihood. Investors will likely put more focus on the SACP and credit spreads will become more differentiated.

Chart 1

image

We expect market discipline is necessary to increase efficiency. The government will strike a balance between promoting market discipline and controlling debt risks. Entities, including state owned enterprises (SOEs), that fail to align with policy goals may have to exit or reorganize with other entities.

We also expect policymakers to maintain their hold on key strategic sectors and technology directly through state-led investment or indirectly by mixed-ownership investment.

Writing: Jasper Moiseiwitsch

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

China Country Specialist, Corporate Ratings:Chang Li, Beijing + 86 10 6569 2705;
chang.li@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Melody Peng, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.