articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/190329-the-future-of-banking-hong-kong-s-first-virtual-bank-licenses-will-rejuvenate-the-banking-sector-10928766 content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

The Future Of Banking: Hong Kong's First Virtual Bank Licenses Will Rejuvenate The Banking Sector

COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In Saudi Vision 2030: Credit Implications For Banks And Corporates

COMMENTS

Rising Global Defaults Will Test Private Credit Funds In 2024

NEWS

Updated Financial Institutions Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Methodology Published

COMMENTS

'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pool Trends (First-Quarter 2024)


The Future Of Banking: Hong Kong's First Virtual Bank Licenses Will Rejuvenate The Banking Sector



HONG KONG (S&P Global Ratings) March 29, 2019--The issuance of the first 
virtual banking licenses in Hong Kong is likely to inject new energy into the 
city's banking system. S&P Global Ratings expects the virtual banks to carve 
out a niche market in the Greater Bay Area of Hong Kong, Macau, and Guangdong 
that could spur growth in the banking industry. In our opinion, the increased 
competition in the retail segment will eventually benefit customers and small 
and micro enterprises, and promote financial inclusion.

"Virtual banks could become a new growth engine as they compete fiercely with 
traditional banks on customer experience, product innovation, and delivery 
channels," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Fern Wang. "The virtual 
banks' low-cost business model should allow them to reach customer segments 
that were previously underserved."

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the de facto central bank, granted 
the first batch of three virtual banking licenses on March 27, 2019. The three 
entities expect to launch their services within the next six to nine months.

Significant cost advantages on overheads and infrastructure costs should allow 
the virtual banks to offer a broader range of digital products to underserved 
customers at a lower cost. This could make providing smaller ticket size 
loans, for example, become more viable and fill a gap in inclusive finance.

The virtual banks will not impose on customers any minimum-balance 
requirements or charges on low balances. The lack of physical presence could 
also mean that these banks would likely need to offer higher interest rates to 
compete for deposits, potentially intensifying the pricing competition for 
deposits. We believe the virtual banks' lower overhead costs could also make 
up for their higher funding costs in the long run, especially in Hong Kong 
where rental costs are high.

At first, the virtual banks are likely to have limited product offerings and 
focus on retail banking, but we believe they will gradually expand their 
scope. For example, their cross-selling abilities should increase as they 
obtain relevant licenses from the Securities and Futures Commission and 
Insurance Authority to offer brokerage, insurance, asset management, and other 
financial management products. We also expect virtual banks to sell rather 
simple mainstream products, given the lack of face-to-face interaction with 
potential customers.

Cross-border financial innovation and cross-border selling of products are 
among the key objectives in the Greater Bay Area initiatives. The area has a 
combined GDP of US$1.5 trillion with a total population of around 70 million 
as of end-2017. As such, we see significant growth opportunities for the 
cross-border selling of various financial products once the three governments 
finalize the "Wealth Management Products Connect" and "Insurance Connect" 
initiatives. It would therefore be a natural progression for virtual banks to 
be allowed to acquire customers remotely across the border in the long run, in 
our view.

We do not believe the introduction of virtual banks in Hong Kong will change 
HKMA's banking supervision philosophy. The authority will apply the same 
supervisory requirements on all banks. The HKMA has also made it clear that it 
will not tolerate predatory behavior. Offenders will be dealt with seriously, 
including having their licenses suspended or revoked. 

Hong Kong's banking sector is largely dominated by four note-issuing banks: The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp. Ltd.; Bank of China (Hong Kong) Ltd. 
(BOCHK); Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd. (SCBHK); and Hang Seng Bank 
Limited, a subsidiary of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp. These banks 
represent around 60% of the banking sector's market share by total assets.

"In our view, Hong Kong's top banks are likely to maintain their market 
leadership due to their well-established franchise," said Ms. Wang. 

Virtual banks are more likely to be niche players than direct challengers to 
the existing big four banks. And, BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd., the holding 
company of BOCHK, and SCBHK are even the major shareholders of two of the 
licensed virtual banks.

This report does not constitute a rating action.
 
S&P Global Ratings, part of S&P Global Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), is the world's 
leading provider of independent credit risk research. We publish more than a 
million credit ratings on debt issued by sovereign, municipal, corporate and 
financial sector entities. With over 1,400 credit analysts in 26 countries, 
and more than 150 years' experience of assessing credit risk, we offer a 
unique combination of global coverage and local insight. Our research and 
opinions about relative credit risk provide market participants with 
information that helps to support the growth of transparent, liquid debt 
markets worldwide.
Primary Credit Analyst:Fern Wang, CFA, Hong Kong (852) 2533-3536;
fern.wang@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Ryan Tsang, CFA, Hong Kong (852) 2533-3532;
ryan.tsang@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in