articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240715-sukuk-market-the-calm-before-the-storm-13174532.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Sukuk Market: The Calm Before The Storm?

COMMENTS

EMEA Financial Institutions Monitor 1Q2025: Managing Falling Interest Rates Will Be Key To Solid Profitability

Global Banks Outlook 2025 Interactive Dashboard Tutorial

COMMENTS

Banking Brief: Complicated Shareholder Structures Will Weigh On Italian Bank Consolidation

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Global Banking Outlook 2025: The Case For Cautious Confidence


Sukuk Market: The Calm Before The Storm?

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings is maintaining its global sukuk issuance forecast at about $160 billion-$170 billion following the market's good performance over the first half of 2024. Total issuance reached $91.9 billion over the first six months of this year, up slightly from last year's $91.3 billion. But a notable difference is the 23.8% increase in foreign currency issuances, which reached $32.7 billion by June 30, 2024, up from $26.4 billion a year earlier. The main contributors to this increase were issuers from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Oman, Malaysia, and Kuwait.

Improved visibility on the medium-term trajectory of interest rates has benefited foreign currency-denominated sukuk issuance--we expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to start cutting rates in December 2024. Simultaneously, high financing needs in core Islamic finance countries explain the increased issuance, which is notably funding an ongoing economic transformation program in Saudi Arabia and strong growth in the UAE's non-oil economy.

Adopting AAOIFI's Standard 62 guidelines--as they have been presented--could disrupt the market. This will not affect 2024 issuance but will likely be a consideration from next year. The standard will transition the industry toward asset-backed sukuk by requiring the real transfer of underlying assets to investors.

However, it is difficult to anticipate the appetite for such instruments from both investors and issuers, as well as the legality of moving assets off their balance sheets, given the current market structure. This could either lead to further market fragmentation, or worse, issuance could be put on hold until sukuk structurers figure out a middle ground. A more conservative interpretation of Sharia is already affecting some market structures. But, even if Standard 62 is adopted, it is unlikely to disrupt existing sukuk, since we understand that any changes in contractual obligations are subject to investors' consent.

Financing Needs And Money Policy Visibility Boosted Sukuk Issuance

Global sukuk issuance stabilized in the first half of 2024 (see chart 1). We expect it will reach about $160 billion-$170 billion by the end of the year thanks to higher financing needs in some core Islamic finance countries and improved visibility on rate trajectory. Geopolitical risk has not yet dragged on issuance but could pose some downside risk, though under our base-case scenario we do not expect significant disruption.

Chart 1

image

The volume of local currency-denominated sukuk issuance continues to fall.   Local currency-denominated sukuk issuance has dropped by 8.8% year-on-year, primarily due to lower issuances in Türkiye, Pakistan, UAE, and Malaysia (see chart 2). The largest drop of local currency issuances was in Türkiye, where monetary tightening combined with better fiscal policy coordination continues to help rebalance the economy. Since June 2023, the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye (CBRT) has adopted a host of measures to tighten credit conditions. Among them, the CBRT increased its policy rate to 50% from 8.5% in just 11 months. We expect additional tightening of credit conditions and policies in a bid to tame inflation, which we project will remain elevated in 2024, at an average 55.8%, up from 54% in 2023, before falling to 27.3% in 2025. In the UAE, the decline can be explained by lower local-currency denominated issuance by the Federal Government and other authorities. For Pakistan, the issue might be related to a lack of data on issuances in the first half of 2024. In addition, the fall in local currency issuance in Malaysia was marginal due to the country's strong sukuk issuance footprint. We have observed that local currency issuance in Saudi Arabia has resumed its growing trend. The government has tapped the market with jumbo issuances and has also started to issue retail sukuk.

Chart 2

image

Foreign currency-denominated sukuk continued to increase.   High financing needs in core Islamic finance countries, stable rates, and improved clarity on the future path of rate cuts explain the continued increase in foreign currency-denominated issuances. We have seen a high issuance volume in Saudi where the government and banks continue to tap into the market to finance various projects related to the economic transformation plan (see chart 3). We now expect the Saudi banking system to shift to a moderate net external debt position in the next few months. We have also observed UAE real estate developers and banks accessing the sukuk market. The real estate sector has sustained its strong performance, prompting developers to rush into launching new projects while real estate prices remain high. We have noted that other countries are also contributing to higher foreign currency issuances. In fact, three transactions settling in July total an additional $3.6 billion. We did not see issuers outside core Islamic finance countries coming into the market in the first half of 2024.

Chart 3

image

Change Could Be Around The Corner

In late 2023, the AAOIFI published its exposure draft of Sharia Standard 62 on sukuk. It subsequently delayed the deadline for industry feedback twice, ultimately extending it to July 31, 2024, from March 31, 2024. If it is adopted as proposed, Sharia Standard 62 could change the nature of the sukuk market and increase fragmentation.

A key requirement of the standard is that the ownership and risks related to the underlying assets are to be transferred to sukuk holders. As such, the market will shift from structures where the contractual obligations of sukuk sponsors underpin the repayment to structures where the underlying assets have a more prominent role. In our view, this could affect the market in several possible ways, among them:

  • Sukuk may become more expensive than conventional issuances. In some jurisdictions, issuers or investors will have to incur the cost of asset registration in the name of sukuk holders. This could make some transactions uneconomical, for example, if they use properties in countries where property registration taxes are high.
  • Investors may be exposed to asset-related risks. Confiscation or asset nationalization could become more relevant, posing risks that sponsors may no longer be able to bear. Investors could also be exposed to the market value of the assets, and sponsors may use that to escape their remaining payment obligations if the value of the underlying assets drops materially.
  • Potential legal issues: In some countries, sukuk may become difficult to structure if foreign investors cannot own the assets. Also, the proposed Standard 62 stipulates that Sharia should be the governing law of sukuk while the market norm is to use English law. If English law continues to be used, the standard specifies that the application of the law should not contradict the principles of Sharia as determined by the AAOIFI Sharia standards.

This indicates that if the standard is adopted as is, the market for AAOIFI adopters could be put on hold until sukuk structurers find ways to restore the fixed income characteristics of the instrument and make it more appealing to fixed income investors. This could lead to a situation where the complexity of the instrument increases further or where issuers become obliged to breach contractual obligations or Sharia requirements. Another possibility is a more prominent market fragmentation where it would be divided between AAOIFI adopters and non-adopters. This could encourage some adopters to transition away from the standards if they see a significant effect on their ability to tap capital markets. In any case, some fixed income investors may decide to disinvest temporarily, or permanently, which we observed when previous Sharia requirements were changed.

The market has until July 31, 2024, to comment on Standard 62, and the publication and effective date of the standard is not yet known. Assuming the standard is approved later this year, the adaptation will likely begin next year. We note that a change in standards is unlikely to affect existing sukuk since we understand that any changes in the contractual obligations of these instruments is subject investor consent.

Sustainable And Digital Sukuks Are On The Backburner, For Now

The total volume of sustainable sukuk issuance reached $5.2 billion during the first half of 2024, down from $5.7 billion during the same period last year, though a large transaction from a frequent sustainable sukuk issuer was settled over the past few days. We expect the issuance volume of sustainable sukuk to hover at approximately $10 billion-$12 billion in the absence of any major acceleration in the implementation of net zero policies by core Islamic finance countries or regulatory action. It is also worth noting that 80% of sustainability issuance in the first six months of 2024 came from Gulf Cooperation Council banks as they begin their climate transition journey.

Chart 4

image

In June 2024, the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) approved a regulatory framework for licensing and overseeing stablecoins. This move is likely to encourage the wider adoption of stablecoins and help to resolve one of the impediments for the development of a digital sukuk market, namely how to bring money onto the blockchain. HAQQ-–an Islamic blockchain network--is reportedly working toward obtaining a license to create a stablecoin and issue a sukuk. Given the slow adoption in the conventional world, we believe that digital sukuk will take long time to materialize, especially in the absence of standard legal documents and Sharia interpretation. The Standard 62 adoption could also delay the creation of digital sukuk, so for now it remains a future avenue of growth.

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:Mohamed Damak, Dubai + 97143727153;
mohamed.damak@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Sapna Jagtiani, Dubai + 97143727122;
sapna.jagtiani@spglobal.com
Anais Ozyavuz, Paris + 33 14 420 6773;
anais.ozyavuz@spglobal.com
Nikita Anand, Singapore + 65 6216 1050;
nikita.anand@spglobal.com
Emir Mujkic, Dubai + (971)43727179;
emir.mujkic@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in