articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240911-u-s-transportation-infrastructure-transit-update-sector-view-now-stable-as-dedicated-tax-growth-mitigates-lo-13232384 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Transportation Infrastructure Transit Update: Sector View Now Stable As Dedicated Tax Growth Mitigates Lower Ridership Revenue

COMMENTS

Florida State Finances And Insurance Mechanisms Help Absorb The Blow Of Another Major Storm

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Health Care Rating Actions, September And Third Quarter 2024

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: What Are The Credit Risks Of The Escalating And Expanding Middle East Conflict?

COMMENTS

A Primer On China's Micro And Small Enterprise Lease ABS Market


U.S. Transportation Infrastructure Transit Update: Sector View Now Stable As Dedicated Tax Growth Mitigates Lower Ridership Revenue

We revised our sector view to stable from negative for U.S. public mass transit operators, due to stabilizing credit fundamentals from dedicated tax revenue growth often outpacing fare revenue decreases, recovering-but-still-weaker ridership, and operators' ability to adjust service levels and expenses to restore fiscal structural operating fund balance.

Tax and political support have been key to this developing credit story--either due to revenue growth or from interim and longer-term financial commitments from lawmakers and regional stakeholders. Of note, since October 2023, there were five upgrades and an outlook revision to positive compared with one negative outlook during the same period. These favorable rating trends for the sector reflect growth in dedicated taxes supporting transit and the fundamental strength of the tax bases. (See tables 1-3 for current rating information.)

However, S&P Global Ratings' outlook is negative on three transit agencies, including Bay Area Rapid Transit (A+/Negative), San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (A+/Negative), and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA; AA-/Negative). Notably, these are all large, urban transit providers with a historical reliance on fare revenue that project sizable outyear operating fund deficits once remaining stimulus aid is depleted. For these issuers, an inability to enhance existing recurring revenue sources, establish new recurring ones, and adjust operations and capital spending as needed could result in further credit deterioration, particularly given that we expect lower ridership for the sector will persist.

image

Adapting To A Probable New Normal

The pandemic and its effects on how and where we work have reshaped the mass transit sector. First, there was a precipitous drop in ridership (peak decreases averaged about 80% nationally at the onset of the pandemic) before easing restrictions and vaccine progress resulted in ridership recovering to an average of about 62% in 2022.

Fast forward to 2024, and U.S. ridership is still materially lower at 74% of pre-pandemic levels and we expect it will remain weaker with wide variances between regions and between modes of transit (see chart 1). Transit's business model for moving suburban commuters into and out of the city center five days a week--and the revenue derived from that ridership base--has shifted due to remote working trends and may be more limited to about three-four days a week based on recent demand trends.

Some heavy commuter rail systems continue to experience weakness due to remote working trends, while bus and subway ridership have generally performed better. Consequently, in recent years, mass transit enterprises have adapted service-level operations to meet new passenger demand and rider preferences, which has helped restore fiscal balance. An increase in non-fare revenue sources and eliminating or reduced frequent user rates for some users have mitigated impacts from growing fare evasion. However, the primary generator has been significant tax revenue growth, which in many cases mitigated the effects of falling fare revenue and operating expense increases.

Chart 1

image

However, mass transit operators benefiting from significant dedicated tax revenue to fund operations (sales, property, excise, or income taxes) exhibited relative credit stability throughout the pandemic, with bolstered tax revenue in some cases more than offsetting farebox revenue declines and operating expense increases (see chart 2).

Chart 2

image

Our Ridership Recovery Estimate

Our current baseline activity estimates in chart 3 show public transit recapturing about 75% of pre-pandemic activity in 2024, 80% by 2025, and up to 85% by 2026, or about 5% annual growth as the sector recovers from a still-depressed base. Our 2024 activity estimate for transit is consistent with our previous estimates, which assume national ridership will not recover to near pre-pandemic levels for many years, relying more on slowly developing demographic trends rather than a full restoration of return-to-office policies and other factors. For additional information, see "U.S. Transportation Infrastructure 2024 Activity Estimates Indicate A Return To Pre-Pandemic Levels And Growth, With Transit Ridership Still Recovering", published March 21, 2024. We do not anticipate a return to pre-pandemic farebox recovery ratios in the near future (see chart 4).

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

A Significant Funding Gap Looms For Some Operators

Most transit operators face similar issues: depleted or soon-to-be-depleted federal assistance, slowly-improving-but-still-reduced fare revenue, cost increases spurred by inflation and collective bargaining agreements for an understaffed workforce, growing annual capital spending requirements for maintenance, fare evasion, perceived safety issues, annual capital spending for new train or bus sets, updated fare collection equipment, and (for many) large-scale expansion needs. Also, the current state of transit has focused debate on whether charging users for what many consider a public good is sound public policy, and how to support broader transportation and environmental objectives. With fare revenues covering less of the fixed cost base, several large transit systems face operating fund revenue gaps that will require a variety of actions to achieve a sustainable balance (see table 4).

Although the challenges are clear, permanent solutions to impending operating funding gaps have so far proved elusive for many transit agencies. They have proposed measures over which they have more control, such as implementing fare increases and reducing expenses, developing new revenue sources, seeking cross-support from other multi-jurisdictional planning agencies (such as the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in San Francisco or the Regional Transportation Authority in Chicago), modifying services to meet current and evolving ridership patterns, and redirecting capital spending to operations.

One approach most operators want to avoid is dramatically reducing service levels (number of trains or buses, routes, or frequency) because it would likely prompt further ridership and fare revenue decreases, compounding fiscal problems. In addition, transit agencies generally believe their value proposition to lawmakers and the public is to serve more, not fewer riders. Mass transit providers are also often large employers and the political difficulty of meaningfully reducing headcount is significant. One outcome most observers agree is very unlikely is additional long-term federal operating support.

Realistically, to close forecast operating fund deficits, large transit agencies lacking significant tax support will need access to long-term, dedicated funding above what they currently receive to support anticipated service levels. Absent that, or a dramatic change in the return-to-work movement, modifications in transit schedules, fare increases, and expense reductions are unlikely to compensate for the loss of daily commuters and the revenue they generated to support operations.

Various State Funding Solutions

In certain instances, states have agreed to increase or provide new ongoing financial support for transit operators to meet operating funding gaps. We highlight below several examples where states are providing additional support to mass transit operators to aid in restoring fiscal balance. Our view of additional state support will evaluate whether new funding is one-time in nature or is considered recurring support that can bridge the operating funding gap in the longer term.

California:   The California State Transportation Agency approved more than $1.9 billion in Senate Bill 125 funds to support 22 public transportation agencies, which was the first round of funding included in the transit recovery package from its 2024 budget.

Maryland, Virginia, and D.C.:   WMATA sought regional jurisdictional support from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, which committed to providing $463 million in additional operating funding in fiscal 2025.

Minnesota:   New sales tax and supplemental state appropriations will add substantial recurring revenue for the Minneapolis St. Paul Metropolitan Council. The new 0.75% transportation sales tax, of which the council receives 83%, is levied on retail transactions in each of the seven counties included in its service area. In fiscal 2024, the tax will generate an estimated $359 million and account for an estimated 25%-30% of total revenue. In addition, the council will receive an estimated $100 million in new supplemental state appropriations to balance its Metro Mobility fund. Those appropriations will begin July 1, 2025.

New Jersey:   The state implemented a tax hike on its largest corporations to fund public transportation. The new fee would impose an additional 2.5% tax on corporations with more than $10 million in profits in addition to the existing 9% corporate business tax rate. Proceeds will help fund NJ Transit to alleviate a nearly $1 billion funding gap.

New York:   New York State agreed in its enacted 2024 budget to raise the payroll mobility tax, increasing the amount of revenue the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) will receive each year by about $1.1 billion. The state also agreed to allocate casino license and gaming tax revenue to MTA, starting in 2026, which is projected to provide the authority with $500 million in 2026, $500 million in 2027, and $600 million in 2028. New York City agreed last year to extend and increase its commitment to covering paratransit expenses to June 30, 2030, from June 30, 2024, which is estimated to benefit MTA by about $165 million annually.

Pennsylvania:   Pennsylvania's fiscal 2025 budget included a one-time $80.5 million increase in funding for transit agencies across the state, including the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, and the state expects to revisit additional funding later in 2024.

Will Voter Support For Funding Mass Transit Continue?

A major question is whether local or regional taxpayers who increasingly do not use mass transit will continue to view it as an important public service worthy of tax support, particularly as some mass transit operators pursue ballot initiatives to potentially restore fiscal balance. Looking at election results, the answer might be "more likely than not" but public sentiment is fickle and, like transit itself, outcomes are highly localized.

Data from the American Public Transit Assn. indicate voters considered 170 ballot initiatives between January 2018 and December 2023, and approved 143, or 86%, for a total of about $96 billion in new revenue to support mass transit operations or capital needs (see chart 5). In some regions, transit enhancements are sold as part of a broader mobility plan to ease traffic congestion by adding express bus lanes. Other regions are deep into building out light-rail expansions approved by voters several years ago and funded with regional sales tax measures. Local and regional sales taxes often have an expiration date requiring voters to approve an extension to continue or expand projects.

This is the case for Maricopa County, Ariz.'s Proposition 400 half-cent sales tax, which expires Dec. 31, 2025, and returns to voters in November 2024 for a 20-year extension. The sales tax will provide an estimated $24 billion in funding for both surface roadways and mass transit in the Phoenix region. Beyond just capital investments, in November 2023, Kansas City voters overwhelmingly supported the extension of a 3/8-cent sales tax to fund the operations of the city's free bus service for another 10 years.

A future test of public support may come in fall 2026 when San Francisco Bay Area policymakers are considering a ballot initiative to support regional transit operators, many of which have experienced the worst declines in ridership with no quick rebound in sight. An 18-member transportation revenue measure select committee is meeting through October 2024 to identify what kind of tax measure to propose to the voters, what it would fund, and how it would be paid for. In our view, developing a consensus among stakeholders and devising a measure that receives voter support greater than the two-thirds approval threshold for such special taxes without challenge by tax increase opponents is a steep hill to climb.

Chart 5

image

Table 1

Global mass transit ratings and outlooks
As of Sept. 1, 2024
Issuer Country/state Operating and general obligation pledge*

British Columbia Ferry Services Inc. §

Canada AA-/Negative

Transport for London §

U.K. AA-/Stable

Metropolitano de Tenerife S.A. §

Spain A/Stable

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

CA AA+/Stable

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority

TX AA/Stable

Central Ohio Transit Authority, general obligation

OH AAA/Stable

Chicago Transit Authority

IL A+/Stable

Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority

TX AA-/Stable

Metropolitan Transportation Authority of New York

NY A-/Positive

Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Council, general obligation

MN AAA/Stable

Napa Valley Transportation Authority

CA A-/Stable

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board

CA A+/Stable

Regional Transportation District

CO AA/Stable

Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, property tax

CO AA/Stable

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, general obligation

CA A+/Negative

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

CA A+/Negative

VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority

TX AA/Stable

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

DC AA-/Negative
*Reflects the application of our Global Not-For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure Enterprises criteria to debt issued by not-for-profit operators of transportation assets (e.g. airports, ports, toll facilities, transit). §Reflects the application of Government-Related Entity criteria and Global Not-For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure Enterprises criteria used to determine the stand-alone credit profile of the transit operator.

Table 2

Sales and other tax pledge ratings and outlooks
As of Sept. 1, 2024
Issuer State Ratings*

Bi-State Development Agency Of The Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District

MO AA/Positive

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, first lien

WA AAA/Stable

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, second lien

WA AAA/Stable

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, fourth lien

WA AA+/Stable

Chicago Transit Authority, first lien sales tax

IL AA/Stable

Chicago Transit Authority, second lien sales tax

IL A+/Stable

Dallas Area Rapid Transit

TX AA+/Stable

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

OH AAA/Stable

Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority

TX AAA/Stable

Indianapolis Public Transportation Corp.

IN AA-/Stable

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Measure R senior lien

CA AAA/Stable

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Measure R junior subordinate lien

CA AA/Stable

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, general revenue bonds

CA AA+/Stable

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Proposition A

CA AAA/Stable

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Proposition C

CA AAA/Stable

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority §

MA AA+/Stable

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

GA AAA/Stable

New Orleans Regional Transit Authority

LA AA-/Stable

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, Measure RR sales tax revenues

CA AA+/Stable

Regional Public Transportation Authority

AZ AA+/Stable

Regional Transportation District, first lien of 0.6% sales tax

CO AAA/Stable

Regional Transportation District, first lien of 0.4% sales tax and second lien of 0.6% sales tax

CO AAA/Stable

Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, sales tax

CO AA/Stable

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, sales tax

CA AA+/Negative

San Mateo County Transit District

CA AAA/Stable

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 1976 sales tax

CA AAA/Stable

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Measure A

CA AAA/Stable

Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District, Measure G

CA AA/Stable

Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp.

WA AAA/Stable

Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District

CA AA/Stable

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

OR AAA/Stable

Utah Transit Authority, senior lien

UT AA+/Positive

Utah Transit Authority, subordinate lien

UT AA/Stable

VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority, sales tax

TX AAA/Stable

VIA Metropolitan Transit Advanced Transportation District, sales tax revenue bonds

TX AAA/Stable
*Ratings reflect the application of S&P Global Ratings' Priority-Lien Tax Revenue Debt methodology to priority-lien tax revenue debt such as sales tax issued by U.S. municipal governments, state governments, or other U.S. public finance obligors and also linked to the creditworthiness of the obligor using the Global Not-For-Profit Transportation Infrastructure Enterprises criteria if obligor is an operating transit entity. §MBTA sales tax bond ratings are based on what we perceive to be the stronger pledge of either the state-guaranteed base revenue amount or pledged MBTA sales tax revenue. The current rating reflects pledge of state-guaranteed base revenue amount.

Table 3

Mass transit rating and outlook changes, Oct. 1, 2023-Sept. 1, 2024
Issuer Rating action To From Date

Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, property tax

Upgrade AA AA- September 29, 2023

Metropolitan Transportation Authority of New York

Upgrade A- BBB+ October 3, 2023

British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Negative outlook AA- AA- November 20, 2023

Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District Bi-State Development Agency

Positive outlook AA AA November 20, 2023

New Orleans Regional Transit Authority

Upgrade AA- A+ January 23, 2024

Alameda Contra Costa Transit District

Upgrade AA+ AA March 26, 2024

Transport for London

Upgrade AA- A+ May 20, 2024

Table 4

Operating fund deficits for select transit operators
Operator Estimated federal aid depletion by Revenue gap (fiscal imbalance)

Bay Area Rapid Transit

Fiscal 2026 $300 million-$400 million

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

Fiscal 2026 $12.7 million

Chicago Transit Authority

Fiscal 2025 $577 million

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Fiscal 2024 $240 million

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Fiscal 2026 $696 million

NJ Transit

Fiscal 2026 $767 million
Source: S&P Global Ratings

Hansa Pasyavala contributed research for this article.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Kurt E Forsgren, Boston + 1 (617) 530 8308;
kurt.forsgren@spglobal.com
Scott Shad, Englewood (1) 303-721-4941;
scott.shad@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Sussan S Corson, New York + 1 (212) 438 2014;
sussan.corson@spglobal.com
Joseph J Pezzimenti, New York + 1 (212) 438 2038;
joseph.pezzimenti@spglobal.com
Geoffrey E Buswick, Boston + 1 (617) 530 8311;
geoffrey.buswick@spglobal.com
Kevin R Archer, San Francisco + 1 (415) 3715031;
Kevin.Archer@spglobal.com
Andrew J Stafford, New York + 212-438-1937;
andrew.stafford1@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in