articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241015-u-s-sovereign-brief-post-election-policy-outcomes-will-be-key-for-creditworthiness-13285169.xml content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Sovereign Brief: Post-Election Policy Outcomes Will Be Key For Creditworthiness

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Central And Eastern Europe Sovereign Rating Outlook 2025: Now More Complicated

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Sheinbaum's Agenda And Looming Changes In U.S. And Mexico Relations

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Will Argentina's Economic Adjustment Be Different This Time?


U.S. Sovereign Brief: Post-Election Policy Outcomes Will Be Key For Creditworthiness

This report does not constitute a rating action.

The results of the approaching U.S. presidential and legislative elections will play a key role in determining policy outcomes that inform S&P Global Ratings' view of sovereign creditworthiness.  Fiscal challenges remain the sovereign's key weakness as net general government debt rises toward 100% of GDP.

image

What's Happening

In addition to the presidency, one-third of the Senate and the full House of Representatives are up for election. The composition of the new Congress and its openness to cross-party compromise will inform which legislation the next government can realistically pass. Measures that often need bipartisan congressional approval include the debt ceiling, government funding, tax and spending initiatives, and appointees to the presidential cabinet, judiciary, and Federal Reserve. Other key policy areas, such as trade, fall under the purview of executive order.

Why It Matters

S&P Global Ratings considers policy outcomes that affect key credit factors--not all policy initiatives. Policy that improves or worsens the nation's fiscal deficits and debt burden could most affect our unsolicited sovereign credit rating (AA+/Stable/A-1+), given the U.S.'s key credit weakness is its fiscal profile and given the difficulties of garnering bipartisan cooperation to strengthen it. Notwithstanding rising net general government debt, key credit strengths support the rating (see Background In Brief below).

What Comes Next

We expect the U.S. to maintain its credit strengths. Despite political polarization, the two parties in Congress broadly agree on the direction of foreign policy toward China, skepticism about trade agreements, and industrial policy to promote high technology sectors. We assume potential trade policy initiatives won't diminish the resilience of the U.S.'s fairly closed economy, which remains a leader in global innovation.

Monetary policy credibility meanwhile rests on the system's institutional foundation, which includes the Federal Reserve Board and the 12 Federal Reserve banks. We expect the hard-fought elections could lead to recounts and appeals to state-led verification processes, which, as in the past, would be resolved through established institutional mechanisms.

Concrete deadlines tend to generate congressional action and compromise, particularly amid fiscal policy differences. The debt ceiling suspension, for example, expires in early January 2025. We expect Congress to pass legislation, as on almost 90 occasions since the 1960s, once the "X-date" (when the Treasury runs out of space to deploy extraordinary measures to keep debt below the ceiling) approaches. The rating and outlook incorporate this assumption because politicians recognize the severe consequences on financial markets and the economy of not doing so.

The 2025 budgetary discussion isn't set to resolve until after the elections, with the government funded through Dec. 20. But politicians have also worked to resolve funding without a partial government shutdown in recent years, given its unpopularity and short-term economic hit.

Our fiscal projections assume general government deficits will remain around current levels regardless of the electoral outcome. No candidate is running on a platform of meaningful fiscal consolidation, largely because of political commitments to maintain key components of mandatory spending. This is notwithstanding inflexibility associated with rising ageing-related expenditure pressure, compressed discretionary spending, and a higher and rising interest burden.

However, at the end of 2025, various tax provisions under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will expire unless they are extended through legislative action. This provides an opportunity for Congress and the next administration to revisit the tax code and potentially undertake a broader fiscal discussion.

How the next government--executive and legislative--manages the tax code and spending initiatives will help shape the future deficit and debt trajectory that are key to U.S. creditworthiness.

image

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:Lisa M Schineller, PhD, New York + 1 (212) 438 7352;
lisa.schineller@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Roberto H Sifon-arevalo, New York + 1 (212) 438 7358;
roberto.sifon-arevalo@spglobal.com
Joydeep Mukherji, New York + 1 (212) 438 7351;
joydeep.mukherji@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in