articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241024-fintech-brief-cash-won-t-be-king-much-longer-in-europe-13298929 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Fintech Brief: Cash Won't Be King Much Longer In Europe

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, October 2024: Rating Subscription-Line Facilities Provides Transparency At Inception Of Alternative Investment Funds

COMMENTS

Data Centers: Computing Risks And Opportunities For U.S. Real Estate

COMMENTS

Introduction To Supranationals Special Edition 2024

COMMENTS

What Would An Escalation Of The War In The Middle East Mean For GCC Banks?


Fintech Brief: Cash Won't Be King Much Longer In Europe

Europe might move to more digital payments by 2030.  This continues, even though recent surveys by the European Central Bank (ECB) indicate that approximately 60% of the eurozone population still value the ability to pay with cash. Some large European banks are rolling out the European Payments Initiative (EPI) as an alternative payment solution to counter the dominance of U.S. payment giants. With the EPI, these banks aim to protect their relevance in the payment space and to safeguard against technological disruption.

image

What's Happening

The EPI has introduced its digital wallet in France in October 2024, with Luxembourg and the Netherlands expected to follow suit.  Initially, clients of large French member banks will be able to make person-to-person (P2P) transactions, which will expand to person-to-professional, online and mobile shopping, and point-of-sale (PoS) payments from 2025. EPI's member banks currently serve about 75% of retail customers in Belgium, France, and Germany.

Why It Matters

Payment services are important to European banks' profits.  Apart from financial gains, maintaining strong client relationships through efficient payment services facilitates cross-selling. Currently, European citizens can choose among several payment providers and methods:

  • Global payment giants: Among the most important players in Europe are U.S.-headquartered Visa, Mastercard, and PayPal that use their global payment networks and other proprietary solutions for payment processing. Visa and Mastercard issue close to 8 billion cards globally.
  • Fintechs: London-based disruptors, such as Revolut and Wise, entered multiple European markets and experienced significant growth. These companies offer a range of services, including payment solutions.
  • National mobile payment platforms (mostly owned by banks): TWINT in Switzerland, Swish in Sweden, and BLIK in Poland gained popularity for instant P2P transactions and online PoS payments. These smartphone-based solutions are primarily used domestically and provide efficient payment options.

Payment sovereignty is important for European policymakers, especially within their broader doctrine of an "open strategic autonomy."  The doctrine aims to foster competition and innovation, without relying on technologies and services from non-European countries. For example, the ECB is working on the digital euro, a retail central bank digital currency. We note that its specific use case and advantage over existing payment types remain, to some extent, unclear.

What Comes Next

The success of the EPI remains uncertain.  The EPI requires a large member base and acceptance by most eurozone citizens to be successful. One potential weakness is the platform's current inability to connect to non-euro payment schemes. We think European consumers' willingness to use the EPI's wallet solution for payments could be low and differ among countries. Additionally, an increase in the number of partnering, but also competing, banks from different countries could lead to governance challenges. In our view, incentives are necessary for merchants and their customers to accept the new solution. Acceptance rates can increase quickly if use cases are clear, reliable, cheap, and convenient.

Payment giants and fintechs will dominate payments, considering their strong global presence and ability to scale and innovative.  Well-tested international schemes guarantee reliable, secure, and protected transactions. Payments via stablecoins will likely remain a niche in many markets. Yet they could become more relevant for cross-border P2P transactions, for example in developing and emerging markets, where remittances are important and existing providers are either slow or too costly. The introduction of the digital euro remains uncertain. We believe the EPI and the digital euro could increase the fragmentation of payment markets since new transaction wallets and user applications come on top of existing standards.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Cihan Duran, CFA, Frankfurt +49 69 33999 177;
cihan.duran@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Michal Selbka, New York +1 212 438 0470;
michal.selbka@spglobal.com
Giles Edwards, London + 44 20 7176 7014;
giles.edwards@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in