articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/241204-banking-brief-complicated-shareholder-structures-will-weigh-on-italian-bank-consolidation-13347761 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Banking Brief: Complicated Shareholder Structures Will Weigh On Italian Bank Consolidation

COMMENTS

EMEA Financial Institutions Monitor 1Q2025: Managing Falling Interest Rates Will Be Key To Solid Profitability

Global Banks Outlook 2025 Interactive Dashboard Tutorial

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Global Banking Outlook 2025: The Case For Cautious Confidence

COMMENTS

Nordic Banks: Resilient Profitability And Ample Capitalization Continue To Support Financial Performance


Banking Brief: Complicated Shareholder Structures Will Weigh On Italian Bank Consolidation

UniCredit's offer for Banco BPM is the latest chapter in Italy's stop-start banking consolidation, though hopes of wider consolidation remain complicated by obstructive shareholder structures.  A successful bid would narrow the gap between UniCredit, Italy's number two bank, and its larger domestic rival Intesa Sanpaolo, which strengthened its hold on the top spot with its 2020 purchase of Union di Banche Italiane, then Italy's fourth largest lender. Intesa's deal had been expected to prompt a surge in deals, though that failed to materialize in part due to strategically defensive holdings in mid-sized banks by insurance companies and bancassurance agreements, which S&P Global Ratings expects will continue to complicate hostile bids for Italian banks.

image

What's Happening

On November 25, UniCredit launched an unsolicited, all-share offer worth about €10.1 billion for Banco BPM, Italy's third-largest bank.  The offer came just a few days after Banco BPM had launched an offer for asset manager Anima Holding SpA and bought a 5% stake in another Italian bank, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, from the Italian Government. Banco BPM, on November 26, rebuffed UniCredit's bid, claiming that it was too low and would limit the target's strategic options.

Why It Matters

Intesa Sanpaolo's competitive advantage in Italy is almost unparalleled in comparable banking sectors.  Besides being the largest domestic commercial bank, with about 20% market share in deposits and loans (ahead of UniCredit at 9% and Banco BPM at 5%-6%), the group is also the leading domestic player in life insurance, private banking, and wealth management, all by a wide margin to its domestic rivals.

UniCredit's acquisition of Banco BPM would reduce Intesa Sanpaolo's lead and could reshape the Italian banking sector.  UniCredit would strengthen its market position in the wealthier Northern Italy and expand the scope of financial products that it can offer. An all-share deal would also have limited impact on the enlarged group's capital, while offering upside from cost and revenue synergies (estimated by UniCredit at €900 million and €300 million, respectively).

Italy's banking sector is evolving, and further consolidation seems inevitable.  We continue to expect the banking sector will eventually be split between large players with the scale, revenue diversification, and earning capacity to fund the innovation needed to successfully navigate the digital transition, and smaller, agile banks able to rapidly adapt to changing customer behaviors.

What Comes Next

The outcome of the offer remains highly uncertain and dependent on several factors, including the reactions of different stakeholders.  Credit Agricole's 9.2% stake in Banco BPM means it is the key player and has a strategic decision to make, given its commercial interests and established presence in Italy, as well as its distribution agreements with UniCredit. It is also unclear if there could be alternative options for Banco BPM, including counter offers, or if there could be complications due to its recent acquisition of a stake in Monte dei Paschi from the Italian government (which was purchased at the same time as Anima and Italian entrepreneurs also bought stakes). Finally, we cannot rule out a change to the terms of UniCredit's offer to make it more attractive.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Mirko Sanna, Milan + 390272111275;
mirko.sanna@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Luigi Motti, Madrid + 34 91 788 7234;
luigi.motti@spglobal.com
Francesca Sacchi, Milan + 390272111272;
francesca.sacchi@spglobal.com
Elena Iparraguirre, Madrid + 34 91 389 6963;
elena.iparraguirre@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in