The 'AAAm' local government investment pool (LGIP) trends report shows metrics of U.S.-domiciled LGIPs that seek to maintain principal value ($1.00) and limit exposure to principal losses due to credit risk. The LGIPs featured in this report all conform to our principal stability fund ratings (PSFR) criteria.
In our rating analysis, we emphasize the net asset value (NAV) per share, 'A-1+' credit quality, weighted average maturity to reset (WAM-R), weighted average maturity to final (WAM-F), net asset trends, and the underlying composition of LGIPs. For more, see the "'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools" section at the end of this report.
2024 Year End Market Comment
LGIPs concluded 2024 with record-high asset levels. The noteworthy growth is driven by various factors, such as attractive yields, increased tax proceeds, and residual federal stimulus balances post COVID-19, which continue to elevate pool assets.
Throughout 2024, LGIPs generally maintained competitive yields compared with alternative short-term liquidity options as they outpaced bank deposits and, at times, institutional money market funds.
Pool managers positioned WAMs conservatively in 2024 while seeking opportunities to extend duration where prudent. Market dynamics, such as the inverted yield curve and uncertainty on policy rate cuts, served as a limiting factor when considering extending.
U.S. LGIPs' Assets Tick Higher
Rated pools received inflows throughout the fourth quarter, particularly in the prime sector. Overall rated LGIP assets climbed to $390 billion. Government LGIPs increased to $99 billion (up 3.6% from prior quarter) and prime LGIPs increased to $291 billion (up 4.3% from prior quarter). Prime LGIPs are those that have the ability to invest in corporate and bank credit securities--similar to prime money market funds.
LGIPs generally see an asset influx approaching year-end due to seasonal trends related to tax revenue. We anticipate additional inflows throughout the first quarter of 2025, in line with historical trends.
Chart 1
LGIP Yields Declined Following Rate Cuts
Following the Federal Reserve's 25 basis point (bps) December rate cut, government and prime yields fell to 4.41% (58-bps decline) and 4.58% (50-bps decline), respectively (see table 1). Like institutional money market funds, average prime LGIP yields decreased at a slower rate than government pools, resulting in a marginally expanded spread.
Table 1
'AAAm' LGIP seven-day net yield (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Dec-23 | Mar-24 | Jun-24 | Sep-24 | Dec-24 |
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 5.32 | 5.28 | 5.27 | 4.99 | 4.41 |
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 5.49 | 5.44 | 5.4 | 5.08 | 4.58 |
NAV Stability
The NAV per share averaged 1.000151 in fourth-quarter 2024. Fourth-quarter NAV ranges were tighter than past quarters, likely due to seasonal inflows and an increased allocation to U.S. Treasuries. In our view, the NAV resiliency in rated LGIPs demonstrated pool managers emphasizing liquidity and high-quality investments, even while seeking opportunities to extend average maturities.
Chart 2
Managers Start To Extend Maturities But Overall Are Remaining Conservative
In our view, a portfolio's WAM is a key measure of a fund's tolerance and sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Based on recent Fed policy, managers have remained conservative both from a WAM and weighted-average life standpoint. On average, managers extended WAMs in government funds to 36 days (+8 days) and prime funds to 40 days (+6 days). Pools have been cautious in their approach to investment allocation, mostly remaining unchanged, with a small uptick in U.S. government securities and a decrease in agency floaters. Based on our observations, we note that managers may use longer dated treasuries as a tool to prudently extend WAMs slightly while maintaining high levels of liquidity and credit quality.
Chart 3
Chart 4
Economic Updates
The underlying instruments in LGIP portfolios are generally high credit quality ('A-1' or higher) U.S. government, U.S. agency, and bank investments (see table 3 and chart 6). Recognizing the impacts of economic conditions on such investments, we cite some of the key takeaways from recent reports: "Credit Conditions North America Q1 2025: Policy Shifts, Rising Tensions," Dec. 12, 2024, and "Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty," Nov. 26, 2024.
- S&P Global Ratings economists forecast the Fed's policy rate falling to 3.00%-3.25% by fourth-quarter 2026.
- We expect the U.S. economy to expand 2% in the next two years, following 2.7% growth in 2024.
- The suspension of the debt ceiling expired in early January, but we expect congressional action later in 2025.
Table 2
'AAAm' LGIP 'A-1+' credit quality (%) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Dec-23 | Mar-24 | Jun-24 | Sep-24 | Dec-24 | |||||||
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ government LGIPs | 99 | 100 | 99 | 99 | 99 | |||||||
S&P Global Ratings ‘AAAm’ prime LGIPs | 64 | 63 | 63 | 64 | 62 | |||||||
LGIP--Local government investment pool. |
Chart 5
Chart 6
Chart 7
Table 3
'AAAm' LGIPs--top 10 by assets | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Principal stability fund rating | Local government investment pool | Net assets (mil. $) | --Portfolio maturity (days)-- | 'A-1+' credit quality (%) | NAV per share | |||||||||
WAM-R | WAM-F | |||||||||||||
Government LGIPs | ||||||||||||||
AAAm | TEXPOOL | 34,501 | 35 | 94 | 100 | 0.99996 | ||||||||
AAAm | North Carolina Capital Management Trust - Government Portfolio | 22,593 | 35 | 91 | 98 | 1.00028 | ||||||||
AAAm | New York Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (NY CLASS) | 13,184 | 44 | 85 | 100 | 1.00031 | ||||||||
AAAm | Texas Short Term Asset Reserve (TexSTAR) Cash Reserve Fund | 10,608 | 36 | 92 | 100 | 1.00030 | ||||||||
AAAm | Lone Star Investment Pool- Government Overnight Fund | 7,097 | 26 | 105 | 96 | 1.00020 | ||||||||
AAAm | Pennsylvania School District Liquid Asset Fund - Max Series | 3,690 | 38 | 59 | 100 | 1.00012 | ||||||||
AAAm | New Jersey Asset & Rebate Management Program/Joint Account | 2,015 | 44 | 107 | 100 | 1.00024 | ||||||||
AAAm | New York Liquid Asset Fund - MAX Portfolio | 1,724 | 41 | 41 | 100 | 1.00016 | ||||||||
AAAm | Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS Government) | 1,520 | 17 | 104 | 100 | 1.00010 | ||||||||
AAAm | Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PRIME) | 701 | 18 | 103 | 100 | 1.00012 | ||||||||
Prime LGIPs | ||||||||||||||
AAAm | Florida PRIME | 32,640 | 49 | 58 | 56 | 1.00001 | ||||||||
AAAm | Texas Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System (TX CLASS) | 24,524 | 46 | 85 | 56 | 1.00008 | ||||||||
AAAm | State Treasury Asset Reserve of Ohio (STAR OHIO) | 21,589 | 27 | 56 | 58 | 1.00008 | ||||||||
AAAm | California Asset Management Trust/Cash Reserve Portfolio | 19,628 | 42 | 78 | 52 | 1.00023 | ||||||||
AAAm | Connecticut State Treasurer's Short-Term Investment Fund | 17,524 | 20 | 89 | 82 | 1.00019 | ||||||||
AAAm | Virginia Local Government Investment Pool | 14,254 | 47 | 96 | 75 | 1.00000 | ||||||||
AAAm | TEXPOOL Prime | 14,010 | 51 | 60 | 67 | 0.99998 | ||||||||
AAAm | Colorado Local Government Liquid Asset Trust (COLOTRUST PLUS+) | 13,429 | 40 | 86 | 56 | 1.00007 | ||||||||
AAAm | Maryland Local Government Investment Pool | 13,304 | 41 | 40 | 79 | 1.00010 | ||||||||
AAAm | Local Government Investment Cooperative | 12,824 | 50 | 83 | 51 | 1.00021 | ||||||||
Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
'AAAm' Local Government Investment Pools
LGIPs are present in many U.S. states where, generally, the state treasurer oversees a pooled investment vehicle that operates in a similar way to a money market fund. Typically a cost-effective investment option, LGIPs allow municipalities and public entities to combine their idle cash and operating balances to obtain economies of scale, through a diversified range of investments, to earn an incremental rate of return.
Unlike money market funds registered with the SEC, LGIPs are not regulated by the SEC and therefore not subject to SEC rule 2a-7. However, LGIPs typically benefit from the purview of state statutes, which provide guidelines on LGIPs' investment policy and objective, as well as from the standards and guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, where standard 79 allows the use of amortized cost to value an LGIP's portfolio assets.
Our LGIP metrics demonstrate the investment practices of 'AAAm' rated LGIPs and those conforming to our PSFR criteria. If an individual LGIP's metrics are below our benchmarks, this may indicate a more conservative approach to investment. Metrics well above our benchmarks may signal a more aggressive approach, albeit still within the range for a 'AAAm' PSFR.
Related Research
- Credit Conditions North America Q1 2025 Slides: Policy Shifts, Rising Tensions, Dec. 12, 2024
- Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty, Nov. 26, 2024
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Kara Wachsmann, Englewood + 303 721 4547; kara.wachsmann@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Michael Masih, New York + 1 (212) 438 1642; michael.masih@spglobal.com |
Andrew Paranthoiene, London + 44 20 7176 8416; andrew.paranthoiene@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.