articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250303-european-building-materials-issuers-could-withstand-potential-u-s-tariffs-13419522 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

European Building Materials Issuers Could Withstand Potential U.S. Tariffs

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Issuer Ranking: North American Unregulated Power Companies, Strongest To Weakest

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Assessing The Credit Quality Of Large U.S. Media Companies (2025 Edition)

COMMENTS

China's Car Sector: A Shakeout Looms


European Building Materials Issuers Could Withstand Potential U.S. Tariffs

(Editor's Note: S&P Global Ratings believes there is a high degree of unpredictability about policy implementation by the U.S. administration and possible responses--specifically with regard to tariffs--and the potential effect on economies, supply chains, and credit conditions around the world. As a result, our baseline forecasts carry a significant amount of uncertainty. As situations evolve, we will gauge the macro and credit materiality of potential and actual policy shifts and reassess our guidance.)

U.S. President Trump announced several tariffs since he took office on Jan. 20, 2025. The timing and implementation of these potential tariffs remain unclear.

  • On Feb. 1, Mr. Trump announced tariffs of 25% on goods imported from Mexico and Canada, 10% on energy products from Canada, and 10% on goods imported from China. China responded with retaliatory tariffs of 10%-15% on certain U.S. products.
  • On Feb. 3, the U.S. and Mexico agreed to postpone tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada by one month. Canada and Mexico will likely impose tariffs on U.S. goods if the U.S. introduces the tariffs.
  • On Feb. 10, the U.S. president announced a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports that is due to take effect on March 12.
  • On Feb. 26, the U.S. president announced a 25% tariff on European goods that will be applied soon.
  • On Feb. 27, Mr. Trump said that the U.S. would impose an additional 10% tariff on imports from China.

A potential universal tariff on all U.S. imports could increase costs for building materials companies and households. In fact, the largest rated European building materials issuers have a meaningful U.S. presence, which has increased both organically and through external acquisitions over the past decade.

The U.S. market currently constitutes the main contributor to issuers' consolidated profits. Most European issuers' production facilities in the U.S. match the local demand. The global supply chain footprints of some European light-industry building materials producers extend to Canada, Mexico, and China.

Tariff Effects On Heavy Industry Are Constrained

We believe a deterioration in trade relationships among the U.S., Canada, and Mexico would only affect selected materials and products, such as lumber and gypsum. For example, a press release the National Association of Home Builders in the U.S. suggests that about 70% of the sawmill and wood products that the U.S. imported in 2023 came from Canada. The U.S. also imported $452 million worth of lime and gypsum products in 2024, with $329 million or 73% of these products originating from Mexico.

Heavy-industry building materials and products are usually made locally since they are inconvenient to ship and therefore subject to high transportation costs. Additionally, some of them must comply with local requirements and regulations. Consequently, the U.S. sales of heavy-industry building materials companies that produce in Europe are limited.

Light Industry Could Be More Affected

U.S. tariffs could be slightly more detrimental for light-industry building materials companies than their heavy-industry peers. This is particularly the case for electrical component manufacturers, which tend to have manufacturing facilities or assembly facilities in low-cost countries or regions, such as Mexico or Asia. Electrical components and products also include chips and electronics, which are primarily sourced in China.

Pass-through of extra costs could become more challenging

We do not assume that companies would immediately change their operating footprint by relocating their production to the U.S. Instead, they will continue to value a geographically diversified production and assembly footprint.

Most building materials companies are confident that they could pass through additional costs from tariffs, not least due to the sector's solid track record of passing through inflation costs over 2022-2024. In our view, however, companies might struggle to pass through tariff-related costs quickly and fully, given the current weakness in the residential construction market. That said, we believe any profitability impairments would be temporary and moderate.

For example, Legrand S.A. announced in its 2024 results that U.S. tariffs could lead to additional costs of $120 million-$140 million, which represents about 1.5% of the company's total sales. In such a scenario, we believe Legrand would pass through these costs and adapt its cost base to fully offset the tariffs. Similarly, Rexel S.A. said that any price increase from its suppliers would be passed through to customers and that the value of its existing inventory would also increase.

We expect companies would pass through tariff-related costs by increasing the value of their products, which could dilute operating margins by an average of up to 0.5 percentage points. The absolute operating margin would remain unchanged.

Megatrends might offset tariff-related impairments

In our view, the light-industry building materials sector still benefits from long-term megatrends, such as digitalization and electrification. Growth perspectives for electrical products in the U.S. will remain solid over the medium term, which is a key opportunity for European companies with a presence in the U.S. For example, the recently announced $500 billion Stargate AI infrastructure project in the U.S. could boost infrastructure end-markets further. In Europe, France also announced a €109 billion AI investment program.

We believe growth prospects for AI and datacenters remain substantial, despite the progress of Asian AI start-ups. For example, Legrand reported a 15% growth in 2024 in its datacenter segment, which now accounts for 20% of sales, and expects double-digit growth in datacenters in 2025. In the case of Legrand, we consider that growth prospect for datacenters will outweigh any potential impairments from U.S. tariffs.

Indirect Implications Are Currently Difficult To Quantify

Indirect risks from U.S. tariffs for the entire building materials industry may include:

  • Decreasing volumes due to a more depressed macro environment (see table 1). If the tariffs remain in place through 2025, we expect they could cause a one-time rise of 0.5%-0.7% in U.S. consumer prices and decrease U.S. real GDP to 1.4% in 2025, compared with our current forecast of 2.0%. Under this scenario, we project U.S. sales volumes of building materials and products companies will likely reduce.
  • Higher housing prices, especially in the multi-family residential end-market. We expect building materials manufacturers and distributers would pass through any additional costs from tariffs. We note that manufacturers have consistently increased prices since 2021, not least due to high inflation. For example, prices of ready-mix concrete increased by more than 50% over 2020-2023, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. This led to a decline in construction and lower volumes of materials sold, even in the U.S. We believe higher tariffs could exacerbate this phenomenon.
  • If U.S. tariffs on European products come into force, we expect retaliation measures from the EU, including tariffs on products from the U.S. Under this scenario, building materials prices in Europe could increase, resulting in additional pressure on volumes. Furthermore, the negative sentiment spreading across other European industries that are more affected by a potential trade war could impair household confidence and an already weak economic growth in Europe. A prolongation of the current downturn in building materials in several European countries would likely put pressure on lower-rated and less geographically diversified European building material companies, whose rating headroom is much lower than that of higher-rated and more diversified groups.

We note that a stronger U.S. dollar could partially mitigate tariff-related impairments and boost the sales of European building materials companies.

Table 1

image

Ratings Impact Remains Limited

Rated European building materials issuers with operations in the U.S. are typically large and diversified. Additionally, they benefit from a stable ratings outlook and adequate rating headroom. Based on our expectation that the direct effects from the tariffs will be limited or offset by the positive effects of megatrends, we forecast that the rating headroom of European building materials issuers will remain broadly unchanged (see table 2). We think it is unlikely that moderate macroeconomic implications alone will put pressure on the ratings.

Table 2

Rated European building materials issuers that are most exposed to the U.S.
Issuer Issuer credit rating Sales in the U.S. in 2023 (%) Expected FFO to debt in 2025 (%) FFO to debt downside threshold (%)

Buzzi SpA

BBB/Stable/A-2  40 >100 45

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain

BBB+/Stable/A-2 32* 35-40 30

CRH plc

BBB+/Stable/A-2 65§ 40-45 30

Heidelberg Materials AG

BBB/Stable/A-2 24§ 40-50 25

Holcim Ltd

BBB+/Stable/A-2 39§ 50-55 30

Legrand S.A.

A-/Stable/A-2 35 40-45 37

Rexel S.A.

BB+/Stable/-- 35 20-30 20

Tarkett Participation

B+/Stable/-- 53§ 15-20 12

Titan Cement International

BB+/Stable/B 58 >60 30
*Operating income instead of sales. §Data for North America. FFO--Funds from operations. Sources: Companies' annual reports, S&P Global Ratings.

Instead, we believe financial policies will continue to determine companies' creditworthiness and our ratings. In case of a meaningful economic downturn due to a wide adoption of trade tariffs, we expect issuers would reduce capital expenditure or share buybacks because they are usually committed to preserving the ratings.

We rate a limited number of European speculative-grade companies that have sales or production assets in the U.S. Rating pressure on speculative-grade issuers, especially those in the 'B' rating category, could arise in case of retaliation measures from the EU. This is because these lower-rated issuers display weaker business profiles and higher financial leverage, meaning they could suffer if pressure on volumes increases.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Pascal Seguier, Paris + 33 1 40 75 25 89;
pascal.seguier@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Renato Panichi, Milan + 39 0272111215;
renato.panichi@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in