articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250403-china-s-bad-loans-could-exceed-6-in-a-tariff-related-downside-13463191 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China's Bad Loans Could Exceed 6% In A Tariff-Related Downside

NEWS

European Banks' Legacy Capital Instruments Could Remain ALAC-Eligible After Regulatory Grandfathering Ends

COMMENTS

Taiwan Banks Could Withstand A Potential Property Downturn

COMMENTS

Private Equity Draws On Continuation Funds To Tackle Liquidity Drought

NEWS

Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Update Published For March 2025


China's Bad Loans Could Exceed 6% In A Tariff-Related Downside

image

It never rains but it pours. China has battled a pandemic, a property downcycle, and a buildup of risky LGFV debt. And it now faces additional strains from more U.S. tariffs on its exports. S&P Global Ratings believes the drag on the economy will hurt the asset quality of banks.

China's GDP held up well prior to the latest tariff hits, delivering 5% real growth in 2024. This kept the commercial banking sector's nonperforming assets (NPAs) resilient at 5.1% of total loans by our estimate, better than our expectation of 5.9% and providing a lower base for our forecasts.

But our economists see tariffs slowing China's real GDP growth to an average of 4% over 2025-2027--and this was prior to the reciprocal tariffs announced by the Trump administration on April 2.

U.S. trade policy could hit export-related sectors and employment, resulting in more bad debt from MSEs and unsecured retail lending. Meanwhile, domestic macro conditions are still uncertain, dependent on the stabilization of China's property market and recovery of consumption, and the resolution of debt burdens for local government financing vehicles (LGFV).

Tariffs Add To Asset Quality Woes

China's growth deceleration could push up the commercial banking sector's NPA ratio over 2025-2027.

Table 1

Slower economic growth is weighing on the asset quality of China's commercial banks

Previous estimates Current estimates (base case)

Commercial bank

2023

2024

2025

2026 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Nonperforming assets %* 5.6 5.9 5.5 5.7 5.6 5.1 5.7 5.9 5.5
Credit loss/ average loans (bps) 115.8 120.3 117.7 127.6 106.7 100.7 101.4 103.4 105.1
NPA provision coverage (%) § 58.8 57.3 61.0 58.5 58.8 62.7 56.9 51.5 55.2

*This broader measure of asset quality includes nonperforming loans, special-mention loans, forborne loans, and other problematic loans that are overdue by 90 days and classified as normal. § Loan loss reserves / nonperforming assets. NPA--Nonperforming assets. Sources: National Financial Regulatory Administration, S&P Global Ratings.

We project the NPA ratio will peak in 2026 (see chart 1). This mirrors China's real GDP growth, which we forecast will trough in 2026 (see "Economic Outlook Asia-Pacific Q2 2025: U.S. Tariffs Will Squeeze, Not Choke, Growth," published on RatingsDirect on March 26, 2025).

Chart 1

image

Tougher asset classification rules mean that within the NPA composition, more of our estimated problem loans will show up over time as headline nonperforming loans (NPLs) or special mention loans (SMLs). The deadline for adjusting classification is end-2025 (see "China Banks Have Fewer Places To Hide Problems Under New Rules," Feb. 13, 2023).

Under our downside scenario in which the tariffs hit harder and the property sector doesn't hit its bottom, we project the China banks' NPA ratio could almost return to COVID-lockdown levels of 6.5% in 2022. If China succeeds, through stimulus measures, to meet its "around 5%" growth target in 2025 and sustain this growth through 2027, then the NPA ratio would likely be less bruising (see chart 2, and "China's Latest Budget Shows A Willingness To Take On More Debt," March 10, 2025).

Chart 2

image

Credit Losses To Increase Only Slowly As Provisioning Buffers Narrow

Weakening asset quality at China's commercial banks will likely push up credit losses (a gauge in provisioning). This increase will be moderated by the sector's ample provisioning buffers. The sector's regulatory NPL provision coverage was 211% in 2024, well above regulatory requirements of 130%-150%. We expect banks with the largest buffers to draw down on such reserves to prevent further erosion of profitability.

Our base case forecasts annual credit losses:

  • Averaging RMB2.5 trillion (US$340 billion) over 2025-2027, up from our estimate of RMB2.1 trillion in 2024;
  • Most of this increase is driven by annual loan growth of 7.0%-7.5% over this period;
  • Annual credit losses could increase by 9% to RMB2.7 trillion in our downside scenario or decline by 13% to RMB2.2 trillion in our upside scenario (see chart 3).

Chart 3

image

The sector is likely to maintain reasonable NPA coverage at an average 54% over 2025-2027, down from 57% over 2021-2024. Hence, as a proportion of average loans, we see credit losses rising only mildly to 1.05% in 2027, from our estimate of 1.01% in 2024 (see chart 4).

Chart 4

image

MSEs' Asset Quality Vulnerable To Tariff Pain

Smaller companies have less financial flexibility to absorb the costs of additional tariffs or pass them on to consumers, in our view. We estimate the NPA ratio for MSE loans will increase to 9.3%-9.6% over 2025-2027, driven by companies in export-related sectors.

Tighter borrowing conditions will likely add to the sector's fallout. China's inclusive lending policies and beneficial capital rules have contained MSE loan problems over the past three years. Hence even at the recent height of the pandemic strains, in 2022, the NPA ratio didn't rise as high as it might have over the next two years (see chart 5). But inclusive lending is reaching its limits.

MSE loan growth is likely to stay at 15% annually over 2025-2027, from 23%-25% annually over 2021-2023. Last year's slowdown in MSE loan growth was sharper than our previous expectation. This was due at least partly to banks' rising risk awareness that further rapid growth for such low-margin loans would erode profitability. MSE loans now exceed 15% of commercial banking sector loans.

Chart 5

image

Loan guarantees will reduce some of the banks' potential losses from MSE loans. The National Financing Guarantee Fund (NFGF), in collaboration with banks and local guarantee institutions at provincial or municipal levels, has established a risk-sharing mechanism for policy-supported sectors, such as inclusive and rural finance. Banks typically bear 20%-30% of losses in such arrangements. As of end-2024, the scale of NFGF's insured business was RMB1.6 trillion, of which the proportion of risk-sharing with banks was 93.5%, equivalent to 4.5% of outstanding MSE loans.

Subdued Jobs Prospects To Weigh On Consumer Credit Quality

S&P Global Ratings projects the unemployment rate will stay on the high side for China, at 5.2% over the next few years, from 5.1% in 2024. The knock-on effect on household income may strain the quality of retail loans, especially unsecured credit (consumption and credit card loans).

Pressure was already building in 2024 amid China's uneven economic recovery from the pandemic and property downturn. The average NPL ratio of consumption loans for the major listed banks increased 69 basis points (bps) to 2.39% in 2024. Over the same period, the mortgage NPL ratio rose 32 bps to 0.87%.

We believe the risk is manageable for now. Unsecured credit growth dropped by about one-third to 6.2% in 2024. Consumption loans are still a small part of the total-loan pie and banks have been reducing their exposure to credit card loans (see chart 6).

Nonetheless, China's push to stimulate domestic demand by encouraging banks to increase consumer financing and help borrowers with difficulties could test banks' risk management capabilities.

Chart 6

image

Property Development NPA Pressure To Ease From Elevated Level

S&P Global Ratings expects primary property sales to stabilize towards the second half of 2025, led by higher-value properties in upper-tier cities (see "Surging Secondary Sales To Stabilize China Property In 2025," Jan. 22, 2025). A recovery in primary sales is key to strengthening the balance sheets of the property developers. This will ease the stress on the quality of property development loans, in our view.

By our estimates, the NPA ratio of property development loans fell to 14% in 2024, from 18% in 2023. Measures such as China's "whitelist" mechanism helped. By ensuring access to funds for eligible projects, the whitelist limited the contagion to surviving developers that caused the NPA ratio to spike over 2022-2023. Loan growth for property development more than tripled to about 5% in 2024, above our expectation of a doubling to 3% (see chart 7).

Chart 7

image

Our key forecasts for this sector include:

  • The NPA ratio for property loans will gradually decline over the next three years and reach 7.1% in 2027. This is under our base case, which assumes the property market stabilizes.
  • Reported NPL ratio for property development loans could still rise over 2025-2026 due to stricter asset classification rules, before improving to 5.0% in 2027.
  • Lending to property developers will rise at a slightly slower pace than overall loan growth.

Commercial banks' exposure to the property development sector will therefore remain broadly stable at 6.0% of total loans in 2027 compared with 6.2% in 2024, consistent with the government's stance in stabilizing the property market.

Stable bank funding to developers should help restore homebuyers' confidence in the property market, anchoring an important part of the economy amid tariff threats. We do not expect banks' exposure to grow as a proportion of total loans, given the policy goal of fostering new productive forces. In our view, less reliance on unproductive real estate investment as a growth engine will help address long-term imbalances in the economy.

LGFV Debt Risk Lower With Hidden Debt Swap

China's RMB10 trillion "hidden-debt" swap plan, announced in November 2024, will mitigate banks' LGFV risks (see "LGFV Brief: China's RMB10 Trillion Debt-Swap Scheme Is A Good Start," Nov. 13, 2024). Without the swap, more LGFV debt could have needed restructuring or could have defaulted. Meanwhile, efforts to stabilize the property market could bring back land sales, an important source of fiscal revenue for local governments.

We assume an NPA ratio of about 7% on outstanding loans for "weak-linked" LGFVs--i.e., those with weak ties and roles to the local government and thus less likely to receive support. These entities likely have debt of RMB32 trillion, an exposure that is unlikely to fall by much due to refinancing needs or funding for new projects. Our NPA estimate is down from our previous assumption of 10%, which corresponds to a medium stress scenario in the central bank's financial stability report in 2023, but above the 5% NPA ratio applied in a light stress scenario.

China prioritizes financial stability and will avoid policy settings that cause large-scale LGFV stress, in our view. But the problem has not gone away; LGFVs with very weak credit profiles are still on the hook for debt borrowed for commercial purposes.

Some of the weaker debt is still likely to be restructured. Lower interest rates and maturity extensions can weigh on the capital and earnings of banks. Defaults and haircuts leading to losses could also occur.

Banks, local governments, LGFVs, and original lenders will share the pain as policymakers balance the risk between creating moral hazard and triggering a public confidence event, in our view (see "Is It Working? China's LGFV Debt De-Risk Program One Year On," July 25, 2024).

Such debt restructurings are likely to be spread out over time, and concentrated in debt-laden regions in northeastern and southwestern China. The pain will likely be more acute for smaller financial institutions with loan concentration in these areas (see "LGFV Strains May Inflict A RMB2 Trillion Hit On China Regional Banks," Oct. 18, 2023).

Sharing The Pain

With China facing tariff threats overseas and weak economic conditions at home, smaller banks remain vulnerable and could get weaker in some regions. Consolidation of small and midsized rural banks accelerated in 2024.

The consolidation helped boost the capital and provision buffers of surviving rural banks (see table 2).

But the dissolution of weak rural banks is a reminder that bank failures are possible in China (see "Your Three Minutes In Chinese Rural Financial Institutions: A Thorough Cleanup Could Take A Decade", June 26, 2024).

Table 2

China's rural and city banks have weaker metrics (data as of Q4 2024)
(%) Megabanks Joint-stock banks City banks Rural banks Sectorwide
Return on assets 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6
Capital adequacy ratio 18.3 14.0 13.0 13.5 15.7
NPL ratio 1.2 1.2 1.8 2.8 1.5
NPL coverage 248.0 216.3 188.1 156.4 211.2
Change year on year (percentage point)
Return on assets -0.08 -0.02 -0.12 -0.09 -0.07
Capital adequacy ratio 0.78 0.55 0.35 1.27 0.68
NPL ratio -0.03 -0.04 0.00 -0.54 -0.09
NPL coverage -0.48 -2.77 -6.86 22.03 6.05
The megabanks are China's six largest commercial banks. Q--Quarter. NPL--Nonperforming loans. Sources: National Financial Regulatory Administration, S&P Global Ratings.

Meanwhile, China is marshalling all resources to gird the economy amid toughening macro conditions. This includes leaning on the stronger state-owned banks to support growth within their risk control abilities, such as inclusive lending to MSEs.

Chart 8

image

The government is also playing its part. For the first time since the 2008 global financial crisis, China is planning to inject capital into the megabanks (see "China Banking Brief: More Capital, More Flexibility," March 5, 2025).

But no pain, no gain. Funding the capital replenishment with relatively cheap sovereign bond issuance in return for relatively high dividend yields from the megabanks, China might be getting a good deal. Though only if the banks' bad debt is kept in check.

Editor: Cathy Holcombe

Digital design: Evy Cheung

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Ming Tan, CFA, Singapore + 65 6216 1095;
ming.tan@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Ryan Tsang, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3532;
ryan.tsang@spglobal.com
Xi Cheng, Shanghai + 852 2533 3582;
xi.cheng@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Yoyo Yin, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in