articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250603-japan-life-insurance-brief-rising-latent-losses-on-bonds-are-tolerable-101626556 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Japan Life Insurance Brief: Rising Latent Losses On Bonds Are Tolerable

COMMENTS

41st Annual North American Insurance Conference: "Certainly A Lot Of Uncertainty"

COMMENTS

Industry Report Card: Top-Rated EMEA-Based Insurers: Common Traits

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: Key Trends In The South African Insurance Industry

COMMENTS

Solid Earnings Momentum For Global Multiline Insurers Continues


Japan Life Insurance Brief: Rising Latent Losses On Bonds Are Tolerable

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Japanese life insurers’ creditworthiness can tolerate a rise in latent losses on bonds driven by higher interest rates. The losses will be offset by a decrease in insurance liabilities, on an economic value basis, also driven by the rise in Japanese interest rates.

What's Happening

The market value of domestic bonds in Japanese life insurers' portfolios is declining. This has led to increasing latent losses on part of their bond portfolios, mainly policy-reserve-matching bonds. Rising domestic interest rates are behind the decline. Aggregate latent losses for the four major life insurers on an unconsolidated basis were about ¥8.2 trillion as of March 31, 2025. Japanese life insurers hold massive amounts of long-term bonds, including Japanese government bonds. They do so to ensure asset-liability management (ALM).

Why It Matters

Market price changes in insurance liabilities are not reported under Japanese accounting standards, and so unrealized losses on bonds matching insurance liabilities are gaining increasing market attention. Insurance liabilities are evaluated using a lock-in method: Liabilities are fixed using discount and frequency rates as of their contract dates. The market values of the assets, however, are disclosed. Our analysis, meanwhile, is on an economic value basis. It therefore incorporates latent losses on bonds driven by higher interest rates and fluctuations in matching insurance liabilities.

Japanese life insurers will continue matching the duration of their assets and liabilities for ALM purposes . Generally, the duration of yen-denominated liabilities is slightly longer than yen-denominated assets. However, we estimate that the average duration gap between assets and liabilities has declined from about five years to two years. This is because of moderate increases in interest rates since 2022, and insurers' efforts to extend the tenors of the yen-denominated bonds they hold. As a result, higher interest rates will likely lead to a near-balanced decline in the market values of assets and liabilities. Accordingly, we believe the impact of the higher interest rates will have an effectively neutral impact on our evaluation of capital on an economic value basis.

image

What Comes Next

Further rises in domestic interest rates will heighten impairment risk for bonds. Policy-reserve-matching bonds are reported on an amortized cost basis. Accordingly, changes in market values do not reach profit and loss statements or balance sheets. Nor do influence solvency margin ratios under current regulations. However, market values falling below 50% of book values could, in principle, trigger impairment losses. However, this scenario is remote for now.

Japanese life insurers may replace bonds with latent losses. This would allow them to evade impairment losses and improve investment yields. Insurers would likely report sales losses if they replace bonds in their portfolios. However, the possible impact of such losses on periodic profit/loss would be absorbed by realizing latent profit on available-for-sale securities, including stocks and foreign securities, and drawdowns of price fluctuation reserves. The four life insurance majors have about ¥18.8 trillion of unrealized gains in aggregate for available-for-sale securities on an unconsolidated basis.

Higher interest rates will likely heighten the importance of lapse risk . Rises in interest rates heighten the possibility that holders of savings-type products with low rates of interest could choose to lapse their policies. New solvency regulations come into force at the end of March 2026. Economic solvency ratios (ESR) under the new regulations incorporate the risk of mass lapse. As such, ESRs may decline under new regulations, which could lead to changes in life insurer strategies. However, we do not expect higher interest rates to rapidly increase lapse rates. Protection-type, rather than savings-type, products dominate the Japanese market. In addition, there are products with market value adjustment functions. We also believe life insurers have ample liquidity.

Capital of an insurer with over-hedging is likely to come under pressure from higher interest rates on an economic value basis . Over-hedging involves decreases in assets larger than decreases in economic value-based insurance liabilities because of higher interest rates. Currently, Sony Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (A+/Stable/--) is over-hedging. We will continue to focus on the duration matching strategies of life insurers.

Related Research

Primary Contacts:Koshiro Emura, Tokyo 81-3-4572-6185;
koshiro.emura@spglobal.com
Toshiko Sekine, Tokyo 81-3-4572-6285;
toshiko.sekine@spglobal.com
Toshihiro Matsuo, Tokyo 81-3-4572-6174;
toshihiro.matsuo@spglobal.com
Kentaro Mukoyama, Tokyo 81-3-4572-6300;
kentaro.mukoyama@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in