Key Takeaways
- The key word across both days of our 41st Annual North American Insurance Conference was "uncertainty."
- The main areas of uncertainty (and volatility) on the minds of our external panelists were economics and geopolitics, technology and AI, private credit, extreme weather, and regulation.
- We believe the industry is well-positioned to withstand this uncertainty: Our sector views on global reinsurance and North American life and property/casualty insurance are stable.
Uncertainty Around U.S. Trade Policy
Uncertainty is "a way of life" for insurers
"There's certainly a lot of uncertainty," said our first external speaker, Alan Schnitzer, chairman and CEO of The Travelers Cos. Inc.
This uncertainty doesn't alter Travelers' strategy though, Schnitzer said, because "running this business for uncertainty is just a way of life for us." CEOs from life, property/casualty (P/C), brokers, and reinsurance echoed this view across both days of the conference.
From a broker's perspective, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Chairman and CEO J. Patrick Gallagher, Jr. noted that insurance remains "an incredibly important focus of the leadership teams of most of our clients." He emphasized that the broker's advisory role becomes even more critical during periods of uncertainty, helping clients navigate insurance-related decisions in an evolving landscape.
"Day to day, we're pretty much in the business of managing risk and uncertainty," said Carl Lindner III, Co-CEO of American Financial Group Inc.
"We actually like complex environments," added Tony Cheng, president and CEO of Reinsurance Group of America Inc. (RGA), because the uncertainty spurs demand for the long-term benefits that life insurers provide, and thereby life insurers' demand for reinsurance.
Despite their optimism, uncertainty is the main reason our sector view for life insurance is stable, not positive, said Carmi Margalit, S&P Global Ratings managing director and life insurance sector lead. A possible recession or economic slowdown could put insurers' investment portfolios at risk.
S&P Global Ratings Global Chief Economist Paul Gruenwald noted that we don't have a recession in our baseline view. However, he also said, it's the uncertainty--and associated volatility--driving our forecast changes, not necessarily any specific policy.
Uncertainty Around AI And Cyber Risks
Panelists discussed uncertainty around the pace of change
The rapid pace of technological change was a risk on the minds of many of our CEOs and Selective Insurance Group Inc.'s Chief Risk Officer (CRO) Christopher Cunniff. And this "daunting" pace will "do nothing but accelerate with AI," said Securian Financial Group Inc. Chairman, President, and CEO Christopher Hilger.
Gallagher said the industry has become "smarter" since he began, but AI is not going to get rid of human insight. Athene Holding Ltd. CRO Douglas Niemann thinks "AI will be an awesome tool across all of humanity," including risk officers.
Cunniff and RGA CEO Cheng noted the dual risks of moving too slowly or too quickly with AI. Schnitzer remarked on the pace of not just technological innovation, but adoption. As a result, he said, insurers need to think about how their role in the value chain could evolve and ensure they're investing in the capabilities they'll need for the future.
Cyber Risk And Cyber Insurance
Uncertainty around technological change is also driving demand for cyber insurance, making it "the most dynamic line of business I've seen in decades," said Marc Adee, chairman and CEO of Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. Adee and Selective CRO Cunniff also said the industry led clients to improve their "cyber hygiene" from "uninsurable" levels.
And of course, the industry faces its own cyber risk, which Securian CEO Hilger called, "a battle that's never over."
We're also keeping an eye on AI, tech, and cyber risks for P/C and life insurers.
Uncertainty Around Private Credit
What Is Private Credit Anyway?
- "We have a very broad definition of private credit… Basically anything that's not syndicated, that's heavily bespoke and directly originated." – Lorenzo Lorilla, Brookfield Wealth Solutions chief investment officer.
- "I think it's changed… The key point is, to the extent that that money is utilized for credit… both public and private… that's a healthy thing, and I think they should grow alongside each other to offer different parts of the credit spectrum." – Vandana Sharma, Citibank N.A. CRO.
- "To a certain extent it's in the eye of the beholder… Oftentimes, when people are thinking about private credit, they're thinking about the origination… the so-called complexity premium… and is there access to… information broadly… There's various definitions… We generally try to think about it practically in the context of what is that asset really supporting in… the funding profile." - Douglas Niemann, Athene Holding Ltd. CRO.
The main concerns around private credit tend to be its potential illiquidity, complexity, and opacity. While we're continuing to monitor the trend, we believe the industry currently has a small but growing allocation to private credit.
What's the appropriate allocation?
Life insurance CEO panelists intended to keep private credit a small portion of their balance sheets: Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. Chairman, President, and CEO David O'Malley said his company has a maximum allowance of 10% and is currently under 5%. Securian's Hilger was comfortable with 16%-17% of very highly rated private credit--but "if I don't understand it, we're not going there," he quipped.
Blackstone Inc. Credit and Insurance Head of Insurance and Multi-Asset Investment-Grade Asset Allocation David Watters sees P/C clients starting in the low single digits and going to the high single digits in their allocations. Likewise, Cunniff said Selective is "north of 5%."
What's the appropriate risk?
Our investment professional panelists emphasized that most of their private credit portfolios are investment-grade. Blackstone's Watters also said he would "push back on the notion that private credit is inherently riskier just because it's private."
Private credit is less liquid, but Securian's Hilger believes some less liquid investments--with higher yield and more protections--make sense. On the other hand, O'Malley said Penn Mutual prefers to hold capital until an opportunity to buy cheaper assets arises.
"Insurers are good holders of liquidity risk," Watters said, but not of bad credit risk. Still, Lorilla from Brookfield Wealth Solutions noted "pockets of opportunity" in speculative-grade risk, which Brookfield holds directly on its balance sheet and through structures.
Uncertainty Around Extreme Weather
While we believe the credit fundamentals of North American P/C insurance are strong, extreme weather is a drag, said S&P Global Ratings Managing Director and P/C Sector Lead Neil Stein.
Our panelists agreed that "climate change matters for insurance," as Dr. Julia Borman, assistant vice president, regulatory and rating agency client services for Verisk Analytics Inc. said. But it's not the whole picture.
As extreme weather events are growing more frequent, more severe, and less predictable, Schnitzer from Travelers, General Reinsurance Corp. Chief Underwriter – Regional & Specialty and Mutual Practice Erin Kang, and Selective CRO Cunniff all noted that more people are moving into areas with high climate risk and building more expensive homes (given high inflation). "So it's not just the climate that's changing, it's also the underlying exposure," said Kang.
The industry is working to improve modeling, but certain states--like California--have limited insurers' ability to apply climate models in their underwriting. As a result, California's insurance system is "in crisis," said Eric Goldberg, American Property Casualty Insurance Assn. (APCIA) department vice president and counsel, commercial lines. The state is an example of how "regulators can cause an availability issue in their market" by limiting insurers' nimbleness, said Frances O'Brien, executive vice president and CRO of Chubb Group.
Given USAA's mission, "we don't leave states," said USAA Capital Corp. President and CEO Juan Andrade. But he agreed that regulations in some states are making it hard to keep insurance available and affordable. "The reality is the storms haven't stopped," he added, so there's more work to do.
Saving Up "For Rainy Days"?
Chubb's O'Brien and Gen Re's Kang both said insurers should be able to set aside catastrophe reserves in years where extreme weather events don't occur--to pay claims in the years that they do.
It makes sense to save up "for rainy days," said Kang. That would benefit the insured by providing more stable capital in exposed areas.
Uncertainty Around Regulation
Schnitzer noted the current difficult regulatory environment as one of his top three challenges for the industry. "We need regulators to support risk-based pricing," he said. Dr. Borman also said she spends a lot of time educating regulators on this issue. There were two other main areas where panelists agreed the industry needs to educate and partner with regulators: tort reform and offshore reinsurance.
Tort reform
Allstate Corp. Senior Vice President, Government & Industry Relations Richard Loconte said "you just can't get away" from attorney advertising, and it's "eroding" the trust that policyholders have in their insurers.
In addition to attorney advertising, part of what's driving the increase in claims going to court is litigation financing by hedge funds and "fraudulent operators," said Crum & Forster Holdings Corp. CEO Adee. "Litigation financing is kind of un-American," he added.
These factors have led to more litigation and more expensive verdicts, which are difficult for insurers to price and reserve for. Whether they called it tort reform, social inflation, or "legal system abuse," panelists agreed with American Financial Group's Lindner, who wants to see "more tort reform and effort on litigation financing."
"Since Florida's 2023 tort reform… the frequency of nuclear verdicts has materially declined," said Tim Zawacki, senior lead, equity research/fixed income at S&P Global Market Intelligence. For Andrade, it's no longer accurate to call such large verdicts "nuclear," because they're happening so often. He said reforms like those in Florida are necessary across the country.
To pass those reforms, said Goldberg, from the APCIA, "nothing beats having a good, personal, trust-based relationship with your regulator." He said the industry should try to think about their goals from regulators' point of view: focusing on consumer protection, company solvency, and compliance with the law.
But it's a "constant battle," said Loconte--a win isn't certain to stay, and insurers have to put as much resources into making the reforms stick as they do into getting the reforms passed in the first place.
Offshore reinsurance
On the life side, there's growing interest in offshore reinsurance vehicles--especially in Bermuda.
"The biggest benefit that Bermuda has over all the other offshore jurisdictions is the track record and the experience," said Jeff Burt, Co-CEO of Aquarian Insurance Holdings LLC, which has a Bermuda-based reinsurance arm, Somerset Re.
Talcott Financial Group CEO Imran Siddiqui said for his company, the policyholder is the key stakeholder: "The decision on where to reinsure is mainly driven by clients' preference in jurisdiction and what ultimately serves the policyholders best."
Burt also said there's a misconception that assets are leaving the U.S. to go all over the world, but it doesn't work that way. The ceding company remains on the risk, in case of a recapture, and the assets stay on its balance sheet in most cases, depending on the reinsurance treaty structure.
While mutual company CEOs O'Malley and Hilger both said they're not opposed to offshore reinsurance, they haven't used it yet. O'Malley said his jurisdiction of choice is America. But RGA has its own offshore reinsurance. Cheng said he wants offshore jurisdictions to be well-regulated so the playing field remains relatively level.
Insurance Offers Stability Through Uncertainty
In line with our stable sector views on North American life and P/C insurance and global reinsurance, panelists emphasized the stability that the insurance sector provides in times of uncertainty.
"We are the oxygen of industry," Gallagher said. And when things fall apart, "we… put people's lives back together."
Writer: Devon Reilly
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Andrew Watt, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7868; andrew.watt@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Carmi Margalit, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 2281; carmi.margalit@spglobal.com |
Neil R Stein, New York + 1 (212) 438 5906; neil.stein@spglobal.com | |
Lawrence A Wilkinson, New York + 1 (212) 438 1882; lawrence.wilkinson@spglobal.com | |
Anika Getubig, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 3233; anika.getubig@spglobal.com | |
Saurabh B Khasnis, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4554; saurabh.khasnis@spglobal.com | |
Heena C Abhyankar, New York + 1 (212) 438 1106; heena.abhyankar@spglobal.com | |
Patricia A Kwan, New York + 1 (212) 438 6256; patricia.kwan@spglobal.com | |
Kevin T Ahern, New York + 1 (212) 438 7160; kevin.ahern@spglobal.com | |
Simon Ashworth, London + 44 20 7176 7243; simon.ashworth@spglobal.com | |
Taoufik Gharib, New York + 1 (212) 438 7253; taoufik.gharib@spglobal.com | |
Julie L Herman, New York + 1 (212) 438 3079; julie.herman@spglobal.com | |
David C Tesher, New York + 212-438-2618; david.tesher@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.