articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/240327-your-three-minutes-in-european-clos-altice-france-isn-t-a-big-problem-for-now-13052396 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Your Three Minutes In European CLOs: Altice France Isn't A Big Problem, For Now

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: U.S. CMBS Delinquency Rate Rose 5 Bps To 4.9% In August 2024; Office Loans Maintain The Highest Rate

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

Capacity Market Update: High Or Low, Capacity Prices Are Their Own Solution

COMMENTS

Capacity Market Assumptions For Power Corporate And Project Financings


Your Three Minutes In European CLOs: Altice France Isn't A Big Problem, For Now

A sharp dip in in the price of bonds issued by Altice France S.A. and Altice France Holding S.A. (together, Altice France) is unlikely to have significant knock-on effects  for collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), despite the group's status as the largest individual issuer of debt to European CLOs rated by S&P Global Ratings. The potential for damage is cushioned because CLOs have no forced-sale mechanism, which would make them realize losses related to the market-value of the debt. All things being equal, even a default by Altice France, or a credit rating downgrade, would have limited repercussions for CLOs' performance.

image

What's Happening

On March 20, 2024, Altice France's unsecured bonds fell from above 70% of their notional amount to close to 20% after the company indicated it could discount the value of the debt to reduce its leverage to a new target of 4.0x.

Why It Matters

Altice France debt features in 98% of the European CLOs we rate,  including 343 CLOs that hold Altice France SA instruments and 92 that hold Altice France Holdings SA debt. Total exposure to the two issuers is €1.61 billion across 345 CLOs (some CLOs hold debt from both issuers). The median exposure is about €4.5 million, while the maximum is just over €9.8 million.

Despite significant exposure, the impact of a theoretical Altice France default on CLOs (whilst not negligeable) shouldn't be a major concern, as things stand today.   Even in a default scenario with 100% loss, our analysis finds that none of the CLO's senior overcollateralization ratios (OC ratios), which is one of the measures of the strength of a CLO tranche, will fail, although the cushion measured by the ratio reduces. At junior levels, we estimate that 27 OC ratios would fail across 20 CLOs, though mainly in amortizing CLOs, where positions are more concentrated.

In the event that Altice France is downgraded from 'B-' to 'CCC' the impact on CLOs would be notable, but still not massively disruptive (see table).  That is largely because an increase in assets rated 'CCC' in a CLO does not trigger a forced sale. It does, however, force managers to consider the excess over the threshold (typically 7.5%) at a reduced notional amount in the OC ratios.

Downgrading Altice France would increase the number of CLOs with excess over the 'CCC' threshold of 7.5%
Amortizing CLOs above 7.5% Reinvesting CLOs above 7.5%
Pre-downgrade 4 1
Post-downgrade 11 3
*Based on S&P Global Ratings credit ratings.

What Comes Next

There is considerable uncertainty surrounding the potential actions of Altice France's board and the group's creditors.  We believe Altice France will face challenges in achieving its 4.0x leverage target, and will likely have to rely on asset sales, operating performance recovery (which is currently lagging), and perhaps a debt write-off.

We expect some CLOs will adopt a risk-off posture and seek to reduce their exposure to Altice.  That will be particularly the case if the risk of a credit rating downgrade or wider lack of clarity persists. Irrespective of the outcome with regards to Altice France, the situation is an illustration of the lack of creditor protection in some loan documents which:

  • Don't prevent issuers moving assets beyond the reach of senior and junior creditors.
  • Theoretically enable much, and perhaps all, of the proceeds from asset sales to be paid out as dividends.
  • Can leave creditors worse off and place them in control of a diminished entity.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Emanuele Tamburrano, London + 44 20 7176 3825;
emanuele.tamburrano@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Abhijit A Pawar, London + 44 20 7176 3774;
abhijit.pawar@spglobal.com
Marta Stojanova, London (44) 79-6673-7531;
marta.stojanova@spglobal.com
Shane Ryan, London + 44 20 7176 3461;
shane.ryan@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in