articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250311-credit-faq-how-will-ex-tropical-cyclone-alfred-affect-australian-rmbs-13442026 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How Will Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred Affect Australian RMBS?

COMMENTS

Sustainability Insights: Sustainable Bond Outlook 2025: Latin America Leading The Way For Nature Financing

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: Second Party Opinions

COMMENTS

An Overview Of India's Residential Mortgage And RMBS Market


Credit FAQ: How Will Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred Affect Australian RMBS?

Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred is likely to have only a limited effect on Australian RMBS ratings. Alfred, and the ongoing flooding in its wake, is affecting many areas in South East Queensland and northern New South Wales, home to several million residents.

The weather event follows recent severe flooding in Far North Queensland. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has downgraded Alfred to a "tropical low."

While many affected areas are represented in Australian residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) portfolios, the effects on collateral performance will take time to surface. The credit support built up in many transactions and their geographic diversity should limit any effect on our ratings.

In this Credit FAQ, we consider the effects of Alfred and the ongoing flooding in the context of Australian RMBS portfolios.

Frequently Asked Questions

How exposed are RMBS portfolios to areas affected by ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred?

Most Australian RMBS portfolios are well-diversified geographically. We've outlined the exposure to local government areas that have been more directly affected by Alfred across the Australian RMBS sector in table 1. The list is not exhaustive, given the highly fluid nature of the situation and ongoing flooding risk.

Table 1

Australian RMBS Portfolios' Exposure To Areas More Severely Affected By Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred
Local government areas eligible for natural disaster relief payments Exposure across Australian RMBS sector (%)
New South Wales
Armidale 0.10
Ballina 0.13
Bellingen 0.03
Byron 0.14
Clarence Valley 0.08
Dungog 0.02
Glen Innes-Severn 0.02
Kempsey 0.04
Kyogle 0.01
Lismore 0.09
Midcoast 0.18
Nambucca Valley 0.01
Port Macquarie-Hastings 0.26
Richmond Valley 0.04
Tenterfield 0.01
Tweed 0.37
Queensland*
Gold Coast 3.5
Logan 1.67
Redlands 0.78
Hervey Bay 0.18
Note: New South Wales and Queensland Government Disaster Relief Lists, based on information published on March 10, 2025. *The Queensland local government areas cover many postcodes. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

The figures in table 1 are our conservative estimates because they are based on areas that are currently eligible for Natural Disaster Relief payments from state governments. This does not mean every property within these areas is directly affected by the severe weather events or has been damaged.

How does S&P Global Ratings adjust for physical climate risk in RMBS?

Physical climate risks such as cyclones, floods, storms, or bushfires could severely damage properties and reduce their value, which affects recoveries if borrowers default. In our view, well-diversified portfolios reduce exposure to extreme weather events.

We apply various adjustments to our default multiples for geographic concentration limits to increase our estimate of loss where concentrations exist. These limits are based on state, nonmetropolitan, postcode, and inner-city concentrations. The maximum postcode exposure limit is 2.0%. Most Australian RMBS transactions are constructed to be geographically well diversified and fall within the concentration limits.

Will asset performance be affected by Alfred and ongoing flooding?

Arrears increases following severe weather events are often temporary and take time to surface, reflecting timing delays associated with insurance claims and payouts. Borrowers affected by Alfred will be eligible for financial hardship assistance from lenders, in addition to federal and state government hardship payments. Banks are recommended under the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority's prudential guidance to include loans under hardship arrangements in their arrears reporting. While the inclusion of loans under hardship reporting varies by RMBS lender, most originators include loans under hardship arrangements in their arrears reporting.

Arrears increases could also stem from the disruption to many businesses impacted by Alfred. Power shortages, supply chain issues, and other disruptions are likely to create temporary cashflow pressures as businesses wait for insurance claims to be processed. This could flow through to higher arrears, particularly for self-employed borrowers in these areas.

Arrears increases could be more pronounced, given the higher population density of areas affected by Alfred, particularly in transactions originated by regional lenders with a more concentrated geographic locale. There are currently around six RMBS transactions that have an exposure to Queensland that is greater than 50% of their total loan exposures.

Are ratings likely to be affected?

We don't expect our ratings on most Australian RMBS to be affected by Alfred, given the strong geographic diversification in most RMBS portfolios. Furthermore, the credit support buffers and liquidity features available in most transactions should be adequate to absorb an increase in the loss severity for affected loans in affected areas.

No rating action was taken on RMBS when arrears rose in areas affected by previous natural disasters, including the Black Saturday fires in 2009, floods in 2011, 2021, and 2022 as well as bushfires in 2019.

How does insurance coverage affect loss severity?

Adequate insurance coverage is a key loss-severity risk for physical climate risk in RMBS portfolios. Home insurance policies typically cover several water-related events such as strong winds, storm, cyclone, and rainwater runoff.

According to the Insurance Council of Australia, flood cover is a standard policy inclusion except where it is expressly stated that cover for flooding is excluded or when an option is provided to opt out of flood cover. As flood cover can be optional, some households may opt to drop this if they can no longer afford the premiums.

Insurance premiums have increased considerably in recent years, alongside rising cost-of-living pressures, in response to higher weather-related claims, reinsurance costs, and operating expenses. Australian insurers will likely keep raising home and contents premiums to improve margins and cover higher weather-related claims (see "Australia's Home Underinsurance Could Spread Risks," Feb. 23, 2025).

Rising insurance premiums increase the risk of underinsurance, exposing homeowners and lenders to higher losses. The risk of underinsurance is more pronounced in higher-risk such as flood plains or bushfire zones, where insurance costs are higher.

In Australian RMBS, insurance premiums are included in debt serviceability assessments and insurance coverage must be in place at the time of loan origination. In addition, some lenders will take out insurance on properties when borrowers are in arrears, or maintain blanket insurance policies. But risks remain over insurance currency and the amount of insurance coverage. Under the terms of a mortgage contract, a homeowner is required to maintain adequate property insurance during the term of the loan for the full amount of the replacement value (see "Australia's Home Underinsurance Could Spread Risks," Feb. 23, 2025). The insurance policy should cover fire, storms, flood, and hail. Moreover, the bank can reduce or cancel the loan if adequate insurance is not maintained. Consistent with the broader banking sector, however, most lenders do not routinely check if homeowners are underinsured.

Australia has no avenues or agreements in place for information to be shared between banks and insurers. In New Zealand, we understand that insurers and banks are in discussions to share information (see "Australia's Home Underinsurance Could Spread Risks," Feb. 23, 2025). Given the largely shared ownership of banks and insurers across the Tasman, Australia could adopt a similar practice should it eventuate in New Zealand.

How do severe weather events affect property prices?

Loss severity can be affected by a decline in property prices after a severe weather event. It can be harder to sell a property in an area seen to be more vulnerable to physical climate risk and it can be more costly to rebuild, given the more stringent building codes in flood- or bushfire-prone areas.

Coverage for properties in high-risk areas is likely to become scarce or come with exclusions and could rely on government schemes.

The reduced affordability of natural catastrophe risk coverage has led to greater public intervention to close the insurance protection gap. The Cyclone Reinsurance Pool is one example. This scheme provides reinsurance for insurers operating in cyclone-prone areas to help reduce losses and make insurance premiums for affordable.

To date, the undersupply of housing relative to demand has kept property prices elevated in most areas. However, expansion of development into higher-risk areas could increase losses if insurance for these properties becomes scarce or unaffordable.

Do you consider lenders' physical climate risk preparedness in your credit analysis?

As part of our operational reviews of lenders, we try to understand how they're identifying and managing exposure to physical climate risk, including weather events. As part of our review, we typically ask the following questions:

  • Do you check what risks are covered at minimum by insurance policies, depending on the geographic area and how much insurance policies cover?
  • Is there a minimum coverage requirement before extending finance?
  • What are the standard exclusions?
  • Are there any circumstances in which specific physical risks are excluded?
  • Do your systems allow you to monitor renewal dates for each property?
  • Do you have a blanket insurance policy in place to cover the risk of lapsed or inadequate insurance at the borrower level?
  • Are there any postcodes or areas where loans will not be granted or where lower loan-to-value ratio lending limits apply due to physical climate risks?
  • Do you include property insurance premiums in debt-serviceability calculations?

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).

Primary Credit Analyst:Erin Kitson, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2166;
erin.kitson@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Kate J Thomson, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2104;
kate.thomson@spglobal.com
Narelle Coneybeare, Sydney + 61 2 9255 9838;
narelle.coneybeare@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in