Key Takeaways
- We expect Taiwan banks will rein in home-mortgage lending after last year's bump on the introduction of a government-led preferential housing loan program.
- Banks have manageable exposure to property-related lending and adequate reserve in the event of a market downturn.
- The sector would avoid a major hit capital and earnings even if property-related NPLs rose materially under our stress scenarios.
Softening demand in Taiwan's property market could push up NPLs for banks over the next one to two years. Taiwan Ratings believes most lenders have good capital buffers and could withstand moderate volatility in the domestic property market.
We tested banks' sensitivity to stress scenarios. Residential property transactions are cooling after brisk price rises and a jump in mortgage lending last year. While house prices have stayed strong, a reversal is possible.
In our view, banks have good provisions and financial buffers. The banks have generally tightened their appetite for property-related lending under regulatory exposure limits in recent months. This should help to prevent further lending concentration in the sector amid less-certain market conditions.
Property-Related Lending Growth Will Likely Ease
We anticipate banks will slow their pace of mortgage lending growth to 3%-5% over the next two years. This comes after an unusually strong 10.4% expansion in mortgage lending in 2024 amid a booming housing market and a government-led preferential housing loan program for younger buyers. That level compares with an average of about 7.5% growth during 2019-2023.
Nonetheless, last year's mortgage lending was on par with total loan growth in 2024 (see chart 1a). Banks' property-related exposure (including home mortgages, housing-repair loans and real estate development and construction lending) remain at roughly a third of total loans (see chart 1b).
Chart 1a
Chart 1b
We do not expect the strong momentum of mortgage lending growth in 2024 will persist over the next few quarters. The government-led preferential housing loan program for younger buyers largely explained the boost in transactions, which drove growth in mortgage lending.
Under the program, eight state-owned banks offer quite flexible and favorable terms for qualified applicant including a lower lending rate subsidized by government, tenors of up to 40 years, and a grace period on the repayment of loan principal of up to five years.
The eight stated-owned banks collectively reported about 17% mortgage loan growth in 2024, compared with 10% growth for the whole banking sector in the same period. In our view, this pace will likely slow.
Property-Related Loan Performance Could See Some Slippage
Cooling transactions and banks' tightening lending capacity for property will likely cap upside in residential markets. By our forecasts, housing prices will be nearly flat over this year and the next (see chart 2). This would be a letdown for homeowners, after a 9%-10% gains in home prices in 2024 and average yearly gains of above 8% during 2021-2024.
Chart 2
Softening market conditions could push more mortgage loans to become overdue in the next two to three years.
Moreover, the gradual expiration of the grace period of three-five years on principal payment of some mortgage loans could add to the burden on borrowers. If residential prices start to fall, the pain could spread quickly. For example, in the event of a market downturn, some small property developers would have higher default risk on their loan obligations
Core Earnings, Capital Buffers Could Handle A Jump In Credit Costs
In our view, the potential credit losses associated with property market volatility could be absorbable by banks' core earnings. The loan-loss reserves applied to real estate loans would also act as a buffer.
The regulator has required banks to set aside a 1.5% credit loss reserve for mortgage and real estate lending, higher than the 1% general reserve for other loans. This is precautionary, given the 90-day delinquency rate for mortgage loans was a low 0.07% in June 2024, and the low level has been maintained since 2021 (see chart 3).
The strong gains in home prices in recent years have contributed to low delinquency rates for real estate development and construction loans.
In our base case, we think nonperforming loans (NPLs) for mortgages will stay below 0.2% of total loans, and real estate NPLs below 0.5% for the next two years.
Chart 3
We also tested more severe scenarios (see table 1). Even if mortgage NPLs surged to 2% and real estate NPLs to 6%, the combined credit losses would be under 25 basis points (0.12% plus 0.11%). That is still absorbable compared to banks' pre-provision return on assets of 80-90 basis points in recent years.
In addition, we believe banks' satisfactory capitalization can further provide a buffer against unexpected property market volatility. As of the end 2024, the sector's regulatory Tier-one capital ratio was about 13%. We believe most banks have adequate to strong capitalization based on our capital framework assessment.
Table 1
Scenario analysis on rising NPLs for property-related loans | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mortgage loan credit losses under various scenario | ||||||||||
NPLs (bil. NT$) | NPL ratio (%) | Potential credit losses (bil. NT$) | Potential credit losses to total assets (%) | |||||||
Base case | 22.2 | 0.2 | 8.9 | 0.01 | ||||||
Stress case 1 | 55.4 | 0.5 | 22.2 | 0.03 | ||||||
Stress case 2 | 110.8 | 1.0 | 44.3 | 0.06 | ||||||
Stress case 3 | 221.7 | 2.0 | 88.7 | 0.12 | ||||||
Real estate development and construction loans | ||||||||||
NPLs (bil. NT$) | NPL ratio (%) | Potential credit losses (bil. NT$) | Potential credit losses to total assets (%) | |||||||
Base case | 17.2 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 0.01 | ||||||
Stress case 1 | 68.8 | 2.0 | 27.5 | 0.04 | ||||||
Stress case 2 | 120.3 | 3.5 | 48.1 | 0.07 | ||||||
Stress case 3 | 206.3 | 6.0 | 82.5 | 0.11 | ||||||
Notes: Our assumptions include 60% recovery rate. Data as of December 2024. NPL--Nonperforming loans. Sources: Taiwan's Central Bank, Financial Supervisory Commission, S&P Global Ratings. |
Adequate Credit Controls And Prudent Growth Appetites Limit The Impact Of Volatile Property Prices
In our view, Taiwan banks have adequate lending and provisioning practices. For example, their underwriting standards are prudent in terms of internal scoring, serviceability test, collateral appraisal and credit provisioning level. The average loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of all outstanding mortgage loans is low at 50%-60%; though some LTVs for newly extended mortgage loans could be at 75%-80% subject to the locations and borrowers' creditworthiness.
The LTV ratio for land lending is generally capped at 40%-50% by regulation, based on the construction stages. This provides good buffer to absorb potential market fluctuations even in a stress case of a 20%-30% price correction.
These defenses would in our view allow the sector to absorb moderate property market volatility. We also expect sector lending appetite to ease after the recent strong run; this too will add to defenses.
Should the property market start to correct, however, some smaller players with higher than average loan exposure to the property market could face earnings pain and capital stress. This would be transmitted through higher credit costs on rising NPLs.
Related Research
- Economic Outlook Asia-Pacific Q2 2025: U.S. Tariffs Will Squeeze, Not Choke, Growth, March 24, 2025
- 2025 Taiwan Credit Outlook: Robust AI Demand Outweighs Trade Risk, Dec.17, 2024
- Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment: Taiwan, July 15 2024
Related Criteria
- Criteria | Financial Institutions | Banks: Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Dec. 9 2021
- Criteria | Financial Institutions | General: Financial Institutions Rating Methodology, Dec. 9 2021
Editor's Note
Taiwan Ratings Corp., a subsidiary of S&P Global Ratings, issues rating symbols accompanied by a "tw" prefix to denote Taiwan and the rating scale's focus on Taiwanese financial markets.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Eunice Fan, Taipei +886-2-2175-6818; eunice.fan@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | YuHan Lan, Taipei +886-2-2175-6810; yuhan.lan@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.